~~each of Mr. Foley, Ms. Miller and Mr. Nave.~~



	~~LIBBEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~Libbey Board of Directors

HOW DOES OUR BOARD SELECT NOMINEES FOR OUR BOARD?

10Libbey Inc.

Corporate Governance

~~Who~~The Board, in its Corporate Governance Guidelines, has determined that Board members must satisfy the following standards and qualifications:

REQUISITE CHARACTERISTICS FOR BOARD CANDIDATES

• the highest professional and personal ethics and values, consistent with long-standing Libbey values and standards

• broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government, education, technology or public interest

• commitment to enhancing shareholder value

• devotion of sufficient time to carry out the duties of Board membership and to provide insight and practical wisdom based upon experience

• expertise in areas that add strategic value to the Board - for example, e-commerce experience, consumer products experience; omni-channel experience; brand marketing experience; diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, age, cultural background or professional experience; broad international exposure or specific in-depth knowledge of a key geographic growth area; shared leadership model experience; extensive knowledge of the Company’s business or in a similar type industry or manufacturing environment; mergers and acquisitions; global business integration experience; significant sophisticated financial understanding or experience; global supply chain expertise; transformative change management experience; information technology or enterprise risk management implementation experience; sitting chief executive officer or chief financial officer of a public company; financial acumen; investor relations experience; and risk oversight or management experience

• serve on the boards of directors of no more than three other public companies and, if intending to serve on the Audit Committee of the Board, serve on the audit committees of no more than two other public companies

In addition, the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the Board’s intention to seek directors who are strategic thinkers, understand complex capital structures and the operational constraints that they create, are members of ~~Libbey’s~~the boards of directors of other public companies and have experience and expertise in corporate governance, marketing expertise and/or experience in the consumer products industry. Consistent with the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board also seeks directors who, as compared to existing members of ~~Directors?~~the Board, are diverse with respect to geography, employment, age, race or gender.

Finally, the Board considers other relevant factors as it deems appropriate, including the Board’s current composition, the balance of management and independent directors, the need for particular subject-matter expertise and the Board’s evaluations of other prospective nominees.

The Nominating and Governance Committee engaged a third-party search firm to identify and recruit Ms. Moerdyk, Mr. Orr and Mr. Nave. Under its charter, the Nominating and Governance Committee has authority to engage third-party search firms in fulfilling its duties to select nominees to the Board.

2019 Proxy Statement 11

Corporate Governance

WHO ARE OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES?

Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with one class standing for election at each Annual ~~Meeting of shareholders. Theo Killion will not stand for reelection at our 2017 Annual Meeting of shareholders. Instead, our~~Meeting. Our Board has nominated ~~Steve Nave, who will be new to our Board,~~Ginger M. Jones and ~~William~~Eileen A. ~~Foley and Deborah G. Miller,~~Mallesch, who are incumbents, for election at our ~~2017~~2019 Annual Meeting of shareholders.



~~Standing for Election - Class III~~		GINGER M. JONES
~~Standing for Election - Class III~~
	~~William A. Foley~~ ~~Age 69~~ ~~Chairman since 2011~~ ~~Director since 1994~~		~~Director Qualifications:~~ ~~• Consumer product marketing experience, particularly in the glass tableware industry~~ ~~• Significant organizational leadership and management skills~~ ~~• Public company board and corporate governance experience~~

~~Professional Experience:~~ Mr. Foley has been Libbey's Chief Executive Officer since January 12, 2016. Since 2011, he also has served as Chairman of the Board, on which he has served as a director since 1994. Mr. Foley served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blonder Accents, LLC from June 2011 until November 2011 and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blonder Company from 2008 until June 2011. Previously, Mr. Foley was President and a director of Arhaus, Inc.; co-founder of Learning Dimensions LLC; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of LESCO Inc.; and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Think Well Inc. Mr. Foley also fulfilled the roles of Vice President, General Manager for The Scotts Company Consumer Division, and Vice President and General Manager of Rubbermaid Inc.'s Specialty Products division. Mr. Foley spent the first 14 years of his career with Anchor Hocking Corp. in various positions, including Vice President of Sales & Marketing of the Consumer and Industrial Products Group. ~~Education:~~ ~~Mr. Foley holds a bachelor's degree from Indiana University and an M.B.A. from Ohio University.~~ ~~Public Company Boards:~~ ~~Mr. Foley is currently on the Board of Directors of Myers Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MYE), and has previous experience on the board of LESCO Inc.~~

	~~Deborah G. Miller~~ ~~Age 67~~ ~~Director since 2003~~		~~Director Qualifications:~~ ~~• Global management experience~~ ~~• Sales and marketing ingenuity~~ ~~• Extensive information technology experience~~

~~Professional Experience~~: From 2003 to the present, Ms. Miller has been the Chief Executive Officer of Enterprise Catalyst Group, a management consulting firm specializing in high technology and biotechnology transformational applications. Ms. Miller was also President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Ascendent Systems, a provider of enterprise voice mobility solutions, from 2005 to 2007. Ms. Miller has more than 30 years of global management experience, including roles as Chief Executive Officer of Maranti Networks; President and Chief Executive Officer of Egenera; Chief Executive Officer of On Demand Software; and various positions with IBM. Throughout her career, Ms. Miller has contributed to the success of international business enterprises with her innovative approach to sales and marketing. ~~Education: Ms. Miller has a bachelor’s degree from Wittenberg University, of which she is an Emeritus member of the Board of Directors.~~ ~~Public Company Boards: Ms. Miller has been a member of the Board of Directors of Sentinel Group Funds, Inc. (SENCX) since 1995.~~



~~LIBBEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~




	~~Steve Nave~~ ~~Age 47~~ ~~Nominated in 2017~~	~~Director Qualifications:~~ ~~• Extensive e-commerce experience~~ ~~• Deep knowledge of retail and consumer products industries~~ ~~• Significant executive leadership experience~~ ~~• Brand marketing expertise~~

~~Professional Experience~~: Mr. Nave currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Bluestem Group Inc., a holding company whose businesses include Bluestem Brands, Inc., a multi-brand, online retailer of a broad selection of name-brand and private label general merchandise through 16 unique retail brands. Mr. Nave has held his current position since November 2014, when a subsidiary of Bluestem Group Inc. acquired Bluestem Brands, Inc. From December 2012 until assuming his current role, Mr. Nave served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Bluestem Brands, Inc. Prior to Bluestem, Mr. Nave held several executive leadership positions with Walmart.com, from its launch in 2000 until 2011, including Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and most recently as its chief executive, as well as serving as a senior officer of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. From 1995 to 2000 he served in both the Audit and Mergers & Acquisitions practices of Ernst & Young, LLP, serving clients in the Retail & Consumer Products and Technology industries. Mr. Nave previously served on the board of directors of Shopzilla, Inc., a leading source of sales and consumer feedback for online merchants and retail advertisers in the United States and Europe. ~~Education: Mr. Nave has a bachelor’s degree in Accounting from Oklahoma State University.~~ ~~Public Company Boards: None.~~

~~Continuing Directors - Classes I and II~~

	~~Carlos V. Duno~~ Class II Age 69 ~~Director since 2003~~	~~Director Qualifications~~: ~~• Strategic planning in international organizations~~ ~~• Glass industry experience, both at Vitro S.A. and as a former director of Anchor Glass Container Corporation~~

~~Professional Experience~~: Mr. Duno is the Owner and Chief Executive Officer of The Hire Firm (since 2006), the premier recruiting and staffing firm in northern New Mexico, and Owner and Chief Executive Officer of CDuno Consulting (since 2004). From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Duno served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Clean Fuels Technology, a leading developer of emulsified fuels for transportation and power generation applications. Mr. Duno’s glass industry experience began during his six years as President of Business Development and Planning for Vitro S.A. in Monterrey, Mexico from 1995 to 2001. Mr. Duno’s earlier professional experience included a two-year term as Vice President Strategic Planning for Scott Paper Company and several years with McKinsey & Co. ~~and Eli Lilly.~~ ~~Education~~: Mr. Duno holds a B.S. in industrial engineering from the National University of Mexico, and an M.B.A. in finance and an M.S. in industrial engineering, both from Columbia University. He also is certified in leadership and transition coaching by the Hudson Institute of Coaching. ~~Public Company Boards: None.~~



	~~LIBBEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~




	~~Ginger M. Jones~~ ~~Class II~~ ~~Age 52~~54 Director since 2013	Independent	Director ~~Qualifications~~:Qualifications: • Experience as chief financial officer of a public company with over $2 billion in revenues • Significant executive leadership experience in financial strategy and experience in public audit functions, resulting in her qualification as an audit committee financial expert • Experience in global supply chain

Professional Experience: Ms. Jones ~~is the~~served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company (NYSE: CTB)~~, where~~ from December 2014 until her retirement in December 2018. Before joining Cooper, she ~~has~~ served ~~since December 2014. She joined Cooper from~~as Chief Financial Officer of Plexus Corp. (NASDAQ: PLXS), a global electronics, engineering and manufacturing services company, ~~where she served as Chief Financial Officer since~~from April 2007 until May 2014 and was responsible for all finance, treasury, investor relations and information technology functions. A certified public accountant, Ms. Jones began her career with Deloitte & Touche, culminating in her role as audit manager for audits of middle market companies. Education ~~Education~~: She holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Utah and an M.B.A. from The Ohio State University Fisher College of Business. Public Company Boards~~: None.~~ Ms. Jones currently serves on the Board of Directors of Tronox Limited (NYSE: TROX) (since April 2018).



	EILEEN A. MALLESCH
		~~Eileen A. Mallesch~~ Class II Age 6163 Director since 2016	Independent	Director ~~Qualifications~~:Qualifications: • Significant financial and enterprise risk management expertise • Public company board and corporate governance experience • Experience with mergers, acquisitions and divestitures • International business experience • Foodservice and consumer products industry knowledge

Professional ~~Experience:~~Experience Ms. Mallesch served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the property and casualty insurance business of Nationwide Insurance from 2005 to 2009. Previously, Ms. Mallesch was employed by General Electric, where she served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Genworth Financial Life Insurance Company from 2003 to 2005; Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GE Financial Employer Services Group from 2000 to 2003; and Controller for GE Americom from 1998 to 2000. Ms. Mallesch’s positions before 2000 include International Business Area Controller, Energy Ventures for Asea Brown Boveri, Inc., a multinational power and automation technologies company, and financial management positions with PepsiCo, Inc. (NYSE: PEP). Ms. Mallesch is a certified public accountant and began her career as a senior auditor with Arthur Andersen. Education ~~Education:~~Ms. Mallesch holds a ~~bachelor's~~bachelor’s degree in accounting from City University of New York. Public Company ~~Boards:~~Boards Ms. Mallesch currently serves on the boards of directors of Brighthouse Financial (NASDAQ: BHF) (since November 2018), Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) (since 2016), and State Auto Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: STFC) (since 2010) ~~and~~. Ms. Mallesch also served on the board of directors of Bob Evans Farms, Inc. ~~(NASDAQ: NOBE) (since 2008).~~from 2008 to January 2018. Before the January 2018 sale to Post Holdings, Inc., Bob Evans Farms, Inc.'s stock was listed on the NASDAQ under the symbol BOBE.

12Libbey Inc.

Corporate Governance

WHO ARE OUR CONTINUING DIRECTORS?



~~LIBBEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~		MICHAEL P. BAUER
		Class I Age 54 Chief Executive Officer since 2019 Director since 2019	Director Qualifications: • Demonstrated ability to turn around and grow businesses under difficult circumstances • Significant financial and leadership skills • Substantial marketing, product development and supply chain experience
	Professional Experience Michael P. Bauer joined Libbey as Chief Executive Officer and a director on March 25, 2019. Before joining Libbey, Mr. Bauer spent more than 20 years with Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. (NYSE: FBHS), serving most recently as President of The Master Lock Company (the Security segment of Fortune Brands) from December 2014 to September 2018. Mr. Bauer previously held roles of increasing responsibility at Moen Incorporated, another Fortune Brands subsidiary, beginning in 1997 as Corporate Controller and culminating in his roles as Vice President and General Manager, Retail Business, from 2007 to 2011, and President, U.S. Business, from 2011 to 2014. Mr. Bauer’s earlier experience includes serving as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance for Nook Industries, Inc. (1997), holding various accounting and finance roles at Avery Dennison Corporation (NYSE: AVY) (1992 to 1997), and working as an audit manager for Coopers & Lybrand (1987 to 1992). Education Mr. Bauer holds a bachelor’s degree from Cleveland State University and an M.B.A. from Case Western Reserve University. Public Company Boards None.



	WILLIAM A. FOLEY
	Class III Age 71 Executive Chairman since 2019 Chairman since 2011 Director since 1994	Director Qualifications: • Consumer product marketing experience, particularly in the glass tableware industry • Significant organizational leadership and management skills • Public company board and corporate governance experience
Professional Experience Mr. Foley served as Libbey's Chief Executive Officer from January 2012 until his retirement on March 24, 2019. Following his retirement, Mr. Foley remains an employee and serves as Executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Foley has been Chairman of the Board since 2011 and a director since 1994. Mr. Foley served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blonder Accents, LLC from June 2011 until November 2011 and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blonder Company from 2008 until June 2011. Previously, Mr. Foley was President and a director of Arhaus, Inc.; co-founder of Learning Dimensions LLC; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of LESCO Inc.; and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Think Well Inc. Mr. Foley also fulfilled the roles of Vice President, General Manager for The Scotts Company Consumer Division, and Vice President and General Manager of Rubbermaid Inc.’s Specialty Products division. Mr. Foley spent the first 14 years of his career with Anchor Hocking Corp. in various positions, including Vice President of Sales & Marketing of the Consumer and Industrial Products Group. Education Mr. Foley holds a bachelor’s degree from Indiana University and an M.B.A. from Ohio University. Public Company Boards Mr. Foley has been a member of the Board of Directors of Myers Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MYE) since 2011.

2019 Proxy Statement 13

Corporate Governance



			DEBORAH G. MILLER
	Class III Age 69 Director since 2003 Independent	~~Carol~~Director Qualifications: • Global management experience • Sales and marketing ingenuity • Extensive information technology experience
Professional Experience From 2003 to the present, Ms. Miller has been Chief Executive Officer of Enterprise Catalyst Group, a management consulting firm specializing in high technology and biotechnology transformational applications. Ms. Miller was also President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Ascendent Systems, a provider of enterprise voice mobility solutions, from 2005 to 2007. Ms. Miller has more than 30 years of global management experience, including roles as Chief Executive Officer of Maranti Networks; President and Chief Executive Officer of Egenera; Chief Executive Officer of On Demand Software; and various positions with IBM. Throughout her career, Ms. Miller has contributed to the success of international business enterprises with her innovative approach to sales and marketing. Education Ms. Miller has a bachelor’s degree from Wittenberg University, of which she is an Emeritus member of the Board of Directors. Public Company Boards Ms. Miller has been a member of the Board of Directors of Sentinel Group Funds, Inc. (SENCX) since 1995.



	CAROL B. ~~Moerdyk~~MOERDYK
	Class I Age 6668 Director since 1998	Independent	Director ~~Qualifications~~:Qualifications: • Significant financial expertise developed through her experience as a CFA and public company chief financial officer • Public company board and corporate governance experience • Executive leadership and U.S. and international operations experience

Professional Experience: Ms. Moerdyk retired from OfficeMax Incorporated (formerly Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation) in 2007. At OfficeMax, she served as Senior Vice President, International from August 2004 until her retirement. Previously, she held various roles at Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation, including Senior Vice President Administration, Senior Vice President North American and Australasian Contract Operations, and Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Moerdyk began her professional career as an assistant professor of finance at the University of Maryland. Education ~~Education~~: Ms. Moerdyk is a Chartered Financial Analyst and holds a bachelor’s degree from Western Michigan University and a Ph.D. Candidate’s Certificate in finance from the University of Michigan. Public Company Boards: Ms. Moerdyk has served on the Board of Directors of American Woodmark Corporation (NASDAQ: AMWD) since 2005.

14Libbey Inc.

Corporate Governance



	STEVE NAVE
	Class III Age 49 Nominated in 2017 Independent	Director Qualifications: • Extensive e-commerce experience • Deep knowledge of retail and consumer products industries • Significant executive leadership experience • Brand marketing expertise
Professional Experience Mr. Nave is the retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Bluestem Group Inc., a holding company whose businesses include Bluestem Brands, Inc., a multi-brand, online retailer of a broad selection of name-brand and private label general merchandise through 16 unique retail brands. Mr. Nave served in that position from November 2014, when a subsidiary of Bluestem Group Inc. acquired Bluestem Brands, Inc., until February 2018, when he retired. Mr. Nave continues to serve as a director of Bluestem Group Inc. (since November 2014). From December 2012 until November 2014, Mr. Nave served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Bluestem Brands, Inc. Prior to Bluestem, Mr. Nave held several executive leadership positions with Walmart.com, from its launch in 2000 until 2011, including Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and most recently as its chief executive, as well as serving as a senior officer of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. From 1995 to 2000 he served in both the Audit and Mergers & Acquisitions practices of Ernst & Young, LLP, serving clients in the Retail & Consumer Products and Technology industries. Mr. Nave previously served on the board of directors of Shopzilla, Inc., a leading source of sales and consumer feedback for online merchants and retail advertisers in the United States and Europe. Education Mr. Nave has a bachelor’s degree in Accounting from Oklahoma State University. Public Company Boards None.



	~~John~~JOHN C. ~~Orr~~ ORR
	Class I Age 66 ~~Lead Director since 2016~~68 Director since 2008	Lead Independent Director since 2016	Director ~~Qualifications~~:Qualifications: • Extensive international manufacturing and plant management experience • Extensive organizational leadership experience • Public company board and corporate governance experience

Professional Experience: From 2005 until his retirement in December 2015, Mr. Orr served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of Myers Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MYE), an international manufacturer of polymer products for industrial, agricultural, automotive, commercial and consumer markets. Before assuming those positions, Mr. Orr was President and Chief Operating Officer of Myers Industries and General Manager of Buckhorn Inc., a Myers Industries subsidiary. Mr. Orr’s earlier career included 28 years with The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company,, where he gained experience in production and plant management at facilities throughout North America and Australia, eventually holding such positions as Director of Manufacturing in Latin America and Vice President Manufacturing for the entire company worldwide. Education ~~Education~~: Mr. Orr holds a B.S. in communication from Ohio University and has ~~additiona~~ladditional training from Harvard Business School in business strategy, finance and operations. Public Company Boards: Mr. Orr served on the Board of Myers Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MYE) from May 2005 to December 2015.

~~How is our Board leadership structured?~~

Our Board has seven non-management directors and one employee director. Theo Killion, who currently serves as a non-management director, will not stand for reelection at the 2017 Annual Meeting of shareholders. The Board has nominated a new independent director, Steve Nave, for election.

~~All of the non-management directors have been determined to be independent. For more information with respect to how the Board determines which directors are considered to be independent, see~~ ~~‘‘How does the Board determine which directors are considered independent?’’~~ ~~below.~~

The Board periodically assesses its leadership structure and, when appropriate, changes its leadership structure, to ensure effective, independent oversight of management and facilitate its engagement in, and understanding of, our business. For example, when Ms. Streeter joined the Company and was named CEO in August 2011, the Board separated the chairman and CEO roles to enable Ms. Streeter to devote herself to becoming familiar with our business, industry and customers.



	~~LIBBEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~

In connection with Ms. Streeter's departure from the Company on January 11, 2016, the Board reevaluated its leadership structure and combined Mr. Foley's role as Chairman with his newly appointed role as CEO. Previously, Mr. Foley had served as an independent director on the Board since 1994 and as independent Chairman of the Board since August 2011. The Board believes that the most effective leadership structure at the present time is for Mr. Foley, an experienced director with a history of overseeing the Company's management, to serve as both Chairman and CEO. Combining the Chairman and CEO roles in Mr. Foley demonstrates to our employees, suppliers, customers and other stakeholders that we are under strong leadership, with a single person, who has extensive institutional and industry knowledge, setting the tone and having primary responsibility for managing our operations.

~~Recognizing the importance of independent Board leadership, the Board also created the role of Independent Lead Director. The Independent Lead Director's duties include:~~

Advising the Chairman and CEO as to an appropriate schedule of Board meetings, to ensure that the non-employee directors can perform their duties responsibly while not interfering with on-going company operations;

~~Approving with the Chairman and CEO the information, agenda and schedules for the Board and Committee meetings;~~

Advising the Chairman and CEO as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the information submitted by management that is necessary or appropriate for the non-employee directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties;

~~Recommending to the Chairman the retention of advisors and consultants to report directly to the Board;~~

~~Calling meetings of the non-employee directors;~~

~~Developing the agendas for and serving as Chairman of the executive sessions of the Board's non-employee directors;~~

~~Serving as principal liaison between the non-employee directors and the Chairman and CEO on sensitive issues;~~

~~Recommending to the Nominating and Governance Committee the membership of various Board Committees, as well as the selection of Committee chairperson;~~

~~Serving as Chairman of the Board when the Chairman is not present;~~

~~Serving as ex-officio member of each committee and regularly attending committee meetings; and~~

~~Lead Independent Director Evaluation of the CEO, including an annual evaluation of the CEO's interactions with the directors and ability to lead and direct the full Board.~~

The Board chose Mr. Orr to assume this role. Mr. Orr has been an independent director on the Board since 2008, serves as the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, and is a member of the Audit Committee.

~~The Board believes that Mr. Foley serving as Chairman and CEO and Mr. Orr serving as Independent Lead Director promotes unified leadership while maintaining effective, independent oversight.~~

~~Does Libbey have Corporate Governance Guidelines?~~

Our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that govern the Board of Directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (which applies to all of our employees, officers and directors), as well as the Charters for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee, are available on our website (~~www.libbey.com~~). They also are available in print, upon request, to any holder of our common stock. Requests should be directed to Corporate Secretary, Libbey Inc., 300 Madison Avenue, P.O. Box 10060, Toledo, Ohio 43699-0060.



~~LIBBEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~

~~What are the roles of the Board’s committees?~~

~~Our Board of Directors has the following standing committees:~~



~~Standing Committee~~	~~Key Functions~~		~~Number of~~ ~~2016 Meetings~~
~~Audit Committee~~	~~See~~ ~~“Audit-Related Matters – Report of the Audit Committee”~~ ~~below.~~		7

~~Compensation Committee~~	•	~~Consider the potential impact of our executive pay program on our risk profile~~	5
	•	~~Review executive pay at comparable companies and recommend to the Board pay levels and incentive compensation plans for our executives~~
	•	~~Review and approve goals and objectives relevant to the targets of the executive incentive compensation plans~~
	•	Establish the CEO’s pay, and in determining the long-term incentive compensation component of the CEO’s pay, consider the Company’s performance, relative shareholder return, the value of similar awards to chief executive officers at comparable companies and the awards given to our CEO in prior years
	•	~~Annually evaluate the Compensation Committee's performance and effectiveness~~
	•	~~Produce an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in the proxy statement or annual report on Form 10-K, as required by the SEC~~
	•	~~Approve award grants under our equity participation plans and oversee and administer these plans~~

~~Nominating and Governance Committee~~	•	~~Develop and implement corporate governance policies and practices~~	5
	•	Establish a selection process for new directors to meet the needs of the Board, for evaluating and recommending candidates for Board membership, for assessing the Board's performance and reviewing that assessment with the Board and for establishing objective criteria to evaluate the CEO's performance
	•	~~Review director pay and recommend to the Board pay levels for our non-management directors~~
	•	~~Review plans for both emergency and orderly succession of the CEO~~

~~The following table identifies, for each of our non-management directors, the committees on which he or she served in 2016 and will serve beginning May 17, 2017:~~

Audit Committee Compensation Committee
Nominating and
Governance Committee
Director 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017
Carlos V. Duno Chair Chair Member Member
William A. Foley⁽¹⁾

Ginger Jones⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
Chair Chair Member Member
Theo Killion⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾
Member Member
Eileen A. Mallesch⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
Member Member Member Member
Deborah G. Miller⁽³⁾
Member Member Member Member
Carol B. Moerdyk Member Member Member Member
John C. Orr⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
Member Member Chair Chair


~~(1)~~	~~Mr. Foley ceased to be a non-management director on January 12, 2016, when he was appointed as our CEO. Accordingly, Mr. Foley no longer serves on any committees.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Determined by the Board to be qualified as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in SEC regulations.~~


~~(3)~~	Determined by the Board to be financially sophisticated and literate and to have accounting and related financial management expertise, as those qualifications are interpreted by the Board in its business judgment.


~~(4)~~	~~Mr. Killion will not stand for reelection at our 2017 Annual Meeting of shareholders.~~



	~~LIBBEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~

2019 Proxy Statement 15

Corporate Governance

The Board has determined that all members of its standing committees are independent, as defined in SEC regulations and the NYSE MKT Company Guide. The Board also has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are ‘‘outside directors,’’ as defined in 26 CFR § 1.162-27.

~~How does our Board oversee risk?~~

Our management is responsible for day-to-day risk management and our Board, through the Audit Committee and the Board’s other committees, is responsible for overseeing our risk management processes. We have an enterprise-wide risk management program. Our Director, Global Audit and Enterprise Risk Management, who reports to the Audit Committee, has primary responsibility for this program. We also have an Enterprise Risk Management Steering Committee comprising members of senior management from across our operations.

Through our enterprise risk management program, we identify, evaluate and address actual and potential risks that may impact our business and our financial results. Our Director, Global Audit and Enterprise Risk Management, routinely reports to our Board and the Audit Committee with respect to the status of our program and particular risks and risk management strategies.

The Board, through the Nominating and Governance Committee, is responsible for regularly reviewing the Company's succession planning, including but not limited to the Company's plans for emergency and orderly succession of the CEO.

~~How does our Board select nominees for the Board?~~

Our Board selects new directors following review and evaluation by the Nominating and Governance Committee, which also proposes and reviews the criteria for membership at least biannually and proposes and reviews the selection process. The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates governance needs and skill requirements, and solicits input from all Board members and makes its recommendation to the Board. The Chairman, on behalf of the Board, extends invitations to join the Board. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a prospective nominee for the Board may notify our Corporate Secretary or any member of the Nominating and Governance Committee in writing, including any supporting material the shareholder deems appropriate. Candidates nominated by shareholders will be given the same consideration as candidates nominated by other sources.

~~The Board, in its Corporate Governance Guidelines, has determined that Board members must satisfy the following standards and qualifications:~~



	~~Requisite Characteristics for Board Candidates~~

	•	~~the highest professional and personal ethics and values, consistent with long-standing Libbey values and standards~~
	•	~~broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government, education, technology or public interest~~
	•	~~commitment to enhancing shareholder value~~
	•	~~devotion of sufficient time to carry out the duties of Board membership and to provide insight and practical wisdom based upon experience~~
	•	expertise in areas that add strategic value to the Board. For example, e-commerce experience, consumer products experience; omni-channel experience; brand marketing experience; diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, age, cultural background or professional experience; broad international exposure or specific in-depth knowledge of a key geographic growth area; shared leadership model experience; extensive knowledge of the Company's business or in a similar type industry or manufacturing environment; mergers and acquisitions; global business integration experience; significant sophisticated financial understanding or experience; global supply chain expertise; transformative change management experience; information technology or enterprise risk management implementation experience; sitting chief executive officer or chief financial officer of a public company; financial acumen; investor relations experience; and risk oversight or management experience.
	•	serve on the boards of directors of no more than three other public companies and, if intending to serve on the Audit Committee of the Board, serve on the audit committees of no more than two other public companies



~~LIBBEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~

expertise and/or experience in the consumer products industry. Consistent with the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board also seeks directors who, as compared to existing members of the Board, are diverse with respect to geography, employment, age, race or gender. Reflecting this desire to foster a diverse Board, four of our current non-management directors are women, one non-management director is Hispanic and one non-management director is African-American.

Finally, the Board considers other relevant factors as it deems appropriate, including the Board's current composition, the balance of management and independent directors, the need for particular subject-matter expertise and the Board’s evaluations of other prospective nominees.

~~How does our Board determine which directors are considered independent?~~HOW DOES OUR BOARD DETERMINE WHICH DIRECTORS ARE CONSIDERED INDEPENDENT?

Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines approved by the Board, the Board has made a determination as to each Board ~~member's~~member’s independence. In making this determination, the Board has considered the existence or absence of any transactions or relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and Libbey and its subsidiaries and affiliates, including those reported under ~~‘‘Corporate Governance —~~ “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, ~~— What transactions involved directors or other related parties?’’~~” below. The Board also examined the existence or absence of any transactions or relationships between directors or their affiliates and members of Libbey’s senior management or their affiliates.

As provided in the Guidelines, the purpose of this review was to determine whether there is any relationship that is inconsistent with a determination that a director is independent of Libbey or its management. Specifically, the Guidelines preclude a determination of independence if the director does not meet the independence requirements in the NYSE ~~MKT~~American Company Guide, since our common stock currently is listed on the NYSE ~~MKT~~American exchange.

As a result of this review, the Board has affirmatively determined that Carlos V. Duno, Ginger M. Jones, ~~Theo Killion,~~ Eileen A. Mallesch, Deborah G. Miller, Carol B. Moerdyk, Steve Nave and John C. Orr are independent of Libbey and its management under the standards set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. Bauer and Mr. Foley isare considered to be an inside ~~director~~directors because of ~~his~~their employment as ~~Libbey's CEO.~~Libbey’s CEO and Executive Chairman, respectively.

Compensation Committee ~~Independence~~Independence. . In determining whether the members of our Compensation Committee are independent, within the meaning established by the NYSE ~~MKT~~American Company Guide, our Board takes into account all factors specifically relevant to a determination of whether any Compensation Committee member has a relationship to us that is material to his or her ability to be independent in connection with his or her duties as a Compensation Committee member. The factors considered include, but are not limited to, the source of compensation of the member and whether the member is affiliated with us or one of our subsidiaries or affiliates. After taking into account all of these factors, our Board has determined that all of the members of our Compensation Committee are independent within the meaning established by the NYSE ~~MKT~~American Company Guide.

~~How often did our~~HOW DOES OUR BOARD THINK ABOUT BOARD REFRESHMENT AND SUCCESSION PLANNING?

The Board ~~meet during fiscal 2016?~~

~~During 2016,~~has no arbitrary term limits. The Board intends to maintain a balance between directors who have longer terms of service and over time have developed greater insight into the Company's business, particularly as it has performed through multiple economic cycles, and directors who have more recently joined the Board. Directors are required to retire from the Board ~~held five regularly scheduled meetings and three special meetings. Each Board member attended 75%~~when they reach the age of 75, although a director elected before his or ~~more of~~her 75th birthday may continue to serve until the ~~aggregate number of Board meetings and at least 75% of~~annual shareholder meeting following the ~~aggregate number of Board committee meetings that~~date on which he or she turns age 75. On the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board may waive this requirement as to any director if it deems the waiver to be in the best interests of the Company.

The Board and each of its standing committees conduct self-evaluations annually. The Board carefully considers the results of the self-evaluations and potential skill gaps among current Board membership when making decisions regarding the addition or replacement of Board members. For example, when searching for a potential new director in 2017, the Board specifically sought a candidate with e-commerce experience, as the Board recognized the lack of e-commerce experience among its then-current members and recognized the importance of e-commerce to the Company's Creating Momentum strategy. Mr. Nave, who has extensive e-commerce experience, ultimately was ~~eligible~~nominated by the Board and elected to ~~attend.~~the Board at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

~~Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — What transactions involved directors or other related parties?~~HOW DO SHAREHOLDERS NOMINATE CANDIDATES FOR THE BOARD?

A ~~substantial majority of our directors is independent, as defined in~~shareholder who wishes to recommend a prospective nominee for the ~~NYSE MKT Company Guide and~~Board may notify our Corporate ~~Governance Guidelines. Our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, which we refer to as our Code of Ethics, generally prohibits related-party transactions involving directors.~~

~~Our Code of Ethics requires that all of Libbey’s directors, officers and other employees avoid conflicts of interest. Related- party transactions~~Secretary or any member of the ~~nature~~Nominating and ~~magnitude that must~~Governance Committee in writing, including any supporting material the shareholder deems appropriate. Candidates nominated by shareholders will be ~~disclosed under Item 404(b) of Regulation S-K would be considered transactions that could give rise to a conflict of interest, and therefore are covered~~given the same consideration as candidates nominated by ~~our Code of Ethics. Our~~other sources.

16Libbey Inc.

Corporate Governance



	~~LIBBEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~The Board's Role and Responsibilities

Code of Ethics requires that conflicts of interest be reported to our Legal Department, and that our General Counsel's written concurrence is required to waive any conflict of interest. In addition, our Code of Ethics requires that waivers of our Code of Ethics with respect to executive officers or directors may be granted only by the Board of Directors and only if the noncompliance with our Code of Ethics is or would be immaterial or if the Board of Directors otherwise determines that extraordinary circumstances exist and that the waiver is in our shareholders' best interests.

~~How do shareholders~~WHAT ARE THE BOARD'S KEY RESPONSIBILITIES?

The Board's key responsibilities include:

Overseeing and ~~other interested parties communicate with~~providing policy guidance for the ~~Board?~~business, affairs and operations of the Company;

Selecting the CEO and electing the officers of the Company;

Monitoring overall corporate performance;

Overseeing and participating in the Company's strategic and business planning process;

Reviewing the annual business budget; and

Reviewing significant risks, issues and opportunities facing the Company and management's approach to addressing such risks, issues and opportunities.

HOW DO SHAREHOLDERS AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES COMMUNICATE WITH THE BOARD?

Shareholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the non-management directors as a group may do so by writing to Non-Management Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Libbey Inc., 300 Madison Avenue, P.O. Box 10060, Toledo, Ohio 43699-0060. The Nominating and Governance Committee has approved a process for handling letters that we receive and that are addressed to the non-management members of the Board. Under that process, the Corporate Secretary is responsible for reviewing all such correspondence and regularly forwarding to the non-management members of the Board a summary of all correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in the Corporate Secretary's opinion, deals with the function of the Board or its committees or that the Corporate Secretary otherwise determines requires the Board's attention. Directors may, at any time, review a log of all correspondence that we receive and that is addressed to the ~~Non-Management Directors~~non-management directors or other Board members and request copies of that correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are brought immediately to the attention of our internal auditors and Audit Committee and are handled according to procedures established by the Audit Committee.

~~Are~~

Board Structure

HOW IS OUR BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURED?

Our Board currently has seven non-management directors and two management directors. After Mr. Duno's retirement from the Board on the day before our annual meeting of stockholders, our Board will have six non-management directors and two management directors. All of the non-management directors have been determined to be independent. For more information with respect to how the Board determines which directors are considered to be independent, see “How does the Board determine which directors are considered independent?”above.

In addition to assessing its leadership structure periodically, the Board assesses its leadership structure when warranted by specific circumstances, such as the appointment of a new CEO. When appropriate, the Board changes its leadership structure to ensure effective, independent oversight of management and to facilitate its engagement in, and understanding of, our business. For example, when Mr. Foley was named CEO in January 2016, the Board believed that the most effective leadership structure at that time was for Mr. Foley, who had served as a director since 1994 and as Chairman since 2011, to serve as both Chairman and CEO. Combining the Chairman and CEO roles in Mr. Foley demonstrated to our employees, suppliers, customers and other stakeholders that we were under strong leadership, with a single person, who has extensive institutional and industry knowledge, setting the tone and having primary responsibility for managing our operations.

Recognizing the importance of independent Board leadership, the Board also created the role of Lead Independent Director and chose Mr. Orr to assume the role. Mr. Orr has been an independent director on the Board since 2008, serves as the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, and is a member of the Audit Committee.

The Board most recently gave significant consideration to our leadership structure in the context of Mr. Foley's retirement as CEO on March 24, 2019. With Mr. Bauer’s appointment to succeed Mr. Foley as CEO, the Board again has separated the role of CEO and Chairman, with Mr. Foley being appointed to serve as Executive Chairman.

Mr. Bauer is responsible for overseeing the day-to-day affairs of Libbey and directing the formulation and implementation of our strategic plans. As Executive Chairman, Mr. Foley is responsible for setting the agendas for and chairing Board meetings and meetings of shareholders, attending meetings of the Board’s committees with the approval of the respective committee, and assisting management in representing Libbey to external groups as needed and as determined by the Board, such as in connection with international trade matters relevant to Libbey.

2019 Proxy Statement 17

Corporate Governance

We believe that this leadership structure is currently the most appropriate for Libbey because it allows our CEO to focus primarily on our business strategy and operations while leveraging the experience of our Executive Chairman to direct the business of the Board. The Board will review Mr. Foley's role as Executive Chairman within the next year.

Mr. Orr, a director since 2008, has served as Lead Independent Director since 2016, when Mr. Foley was appointed Libbey’s CEO. Mr. Orr serves as the principal liaison between the independent, non-management directors, the Executive Chairman and the CEO, and is responsible for approving the agendas for Board meetings, presiding over executive sessions of the independent directors, coordinating feedback from directors in connection with the evaluations of the CEO and each director, and acting as chair of any Board meeting when the Executive Chairman is not present.

WHAT ARE THE ROLES OF THE BOARD’S COMMITTEES?

Our Board of Directors has the following standing committees:



AUDIT COMMITTEE
Ginger Jones⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾, Chair Eileen A. Mallesch⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾Deborah G. Miller⁽²⁾ John C. Orr⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾ Number of 2018 Meetings: 7	See “Audit-Related Matters – Report of the Audit Committee” on page 70.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Carlos V. Duno, Chair⁽³⁾ Ginger Jones Eileen A. Mallesch Carol B. Moerdyk Steve Nave⁽³⁾ Number of 2018 Meetings: 6	• Consider the potential impact of our executive pay program on our risk profile • Review executive pay at comparable companies and recommend to the Board pay levels and incentive compensation plans for our executives • Review and approve goals and objectives relevant to the targets of the executive incentive compensation plans • Establish the CEO’s pay, and in determining the long-term incentive compensation component of the CEO’s pay, consider the Company’s performance, relative shareholder return, the value of similar awards to chief executive officers at comparable companies and the awards given to the CEO in prior years • Annually evaluate the Compensation Committee’s performance and effectiveness • Produce an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in the proxy statement or annual report on Form 10-K, as required by the SEC • Approve award grants under our equity participation plans and oversee and administer these plans

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
John C. Orr, Chair Carlos V. Duno⁽³⁾ Deborah G. Miller Carol B. Moerdyk Number of 2018 Meetings: 5	• Develop and implement corporate governance policies and practices • Establish a selection process for new directors to meet the needs of the Board, evaluate and recommend candidates for Board membership, assess the Board's performance and review that assessment with the Board and establish objective criteria to evaluate the CEO's performance • Review director pay and recommend to the Board pay levels for our non-management directors • Review plans for both emergency and orderly succession of the CEO


(1)	Determined by the Board to be qualified as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in SEC regulations.


(2)	Determined by the Board to be financially sophisticated and literate and to have accounting and related financial management expertise, as those qualifications are interpreted by the Board in its business judgment.


(3)	Effective May 14, 2019, Mr. Nave will replace Mr. Duno as Chair of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Duno will retire from the Board effective immediately preceding the Annual Meeting on May 15, 2019.

The Board has determined that all members of its standing committees are independent, as defined in SEC regulations and the NYSE American Company Guide. The Board also has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are “outside directors,” as defined in 26 CFR § 1.162-27.

HOW OFTEN DID OUR BOARD MEET DURING FISCAL 2018?

During 2018, the Board held five regularly scheduled meetings and two special meetings. Each Board member attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of Board and Board committee meetings that he or she was eligible to attend.

18Libbey Inc.

Corporate Governance

Board Processes

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

A substantial majority of our directors is independent, as defined in the NYSE American Company Guide and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, which we refer to as our Code of Ethics, generally prohibits related-party transactions involving directors.

Our Code of Ethics requires that all of Libbey’s directors, officers and other employees avoid conflicts of interest. Related-party transactions of the nature and magnitude that must be disclosed under Item 404(b) of Regulation S-K would be considered transactions that could give rise to a conflict of interest, and therefore are covered by our Code of Ethics. Our Code of Ethics requires that conflicts of interest be reported to our Legal Department, and that our General Counsel's written concurrence is required to ~~attend Libbey’s Annual Meeting~~waive any conflict of ~~shareholders?~~interest. In addition, our Code of Ethics requires that waivers of our Code of Ethics with respect to executive officers or directors may be granted only by the Board of Directors and only if the noncompliance with our Code of Ethics is or would be immaterial or if the Board of Directors otherwise determines that extraordinary circumstances exist and that the waiver is in our shareholders' best interests.

DOES LIBBEY HAVE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES?

Our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that govern the Board of Directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (which applies to all of our employees, officers and directors), as well as the Charters for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee, are available on our website (www.libbey.com). They also are available in print, upon request, to any holder of our common stock. Requests should be directed to Corporate Secretary, Libbey Inc., 300 Madison Avenue, P.O. Box 10060, Toledo, Ohio 43699-0060.

ARE LIBBEY’S DIRECTORS REQUIRED TO ATTEND LIBBEY’S ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS?

Our directors are not required to attend our Annual Meeting of shareholders, but we typically hold a Board meeting at the same location and on the same day as the Annual Meeting. We anticipate that a substantial majority of our directors will attend the Annual Meeting on May ~~17, 2017.~~15, 2019. In ~~2016,~~2018, all of the Board members other than Mr. Orr attended our Annual Meeting.

2019 Proxy Statement 19

Corporate Governance

Non-Management Directors' Compensation

Although the Nominating and Governance Committee periodically reviews director compensation market data to ensure that the compensation of Libbey's non-management directors remains competitive, Libbey's directors repeatedly have declined to increase the annual cash retainer payable to non-management directors since 2013 and have declined to increase the value of the equity award made to non-management directors since 2015. As a result, a market study of Libbey's non-management director compensation performed in late 2018 found that the compensation paid to Libbey's non-management directors was substantially below the median for the peer group used in developing our 2019 CEO and CFO pay program and below public companies of similar size, as set forth in the most recent National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) 2017-2018 director compensation report. In order to ensure that Libbey's compensation for non-management directors remains sufficiently competitive to attract and retain directors with the skills and expertise needed to support Libbey's strategy, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, an increase in the annual cash retainer payable for Board service and an increase in the value of the annual equity award, as noted in the table below.



ELEMENT OF COMPENSATION		ANNUAL COMPENSATION AMOUNT
Annual Cash Retainer		$47,500 (increased to $62,000 effective January 1, 2019)
Lead Independent Director Cash Retainer		$20,000
Equity Award		On the date of each annual meeting of shareholders, outright grant of shares of common stock valued at $80,000 on the date of grant, attributable to service during the preceding year (increased to $90,000 beginning with the grant on the date of the 2019 Annual Meeting) Our stock retention guidelines require that the director hold the net after-tax shares issued for at least one year from the date of grant
Committee Chair Cash Retainers (in addition to Committee Member Cash Retainers)		$12,500 (Audit Committee and Compensation Committee) $6,500 (Nominating and Governance Committee)
Committee Member Cash Retainers		$7,500 (Audit Committee and Compensation Committee) $5,000 (Nominating and Governance Committee)
Other Fees		$500 per one-half day of service

For service periods of less than one year, amounts are prorated. Our management directors do not receive additional pay for service on the Board of Directors.

We also maintain stock ownership and retention guidelines for non-management directors. The guidelines include, but are not limited to, a requirement that the director hold the net after-tax shares issued to him or her on the date of each annual shareholders meeting for at least one year from the date of grant and, until the director acquires the guideline number of shares, he or she must hold 100% of the net after-tax shares of Libbey common stock issued to him or her on the date of each annual shareholders meeting and all other Libbey shares that he or she owns or otherwise acquires. For more information regarding our stock ownership and retention guidelines for non-management directors, see “Stock Ownership/Retention Guidelines” on page 57.

Pursuant to the Director Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP), directors may elect to defer cash and/or equity compensation into any of 13 measurement funds. The Director DCP and the predecessor deferred compensation plans for which non-management directors were eligible are unfunded plans, and the Company does not guarantee an above-market return on amounts deferred under these plans. Amounts deferred under the Director DCP or a predecessor plan are, at the director's election, payable either in a lump sum or in installments over a period of time selected by the director. Amounts deferred under our first deferred compensation plan for outside directors are payable in a lump sum upon the earlier of the director's death or retirement from our Board.

We reimburse our non-management directors for their travel expenses incurred in attending Board or Board committee meetings and for fees and expenses incurred in attending director education seminars and conferences. The directors do not receive any other personal benefits.

The following table shows the pay received by our non-management directors in 2018.

20Libbey Inc.

Corporate Governance



Director Compensation for Year Ended December 31, 2018
Director	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)⁽¹⁾	Stock Awards ($)⁽²⁾	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)⁽³⁾	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Carlos V. Duno	73,708	79,998	0	0	153,706
Ginger M. Jones	76,208	79,998	0	0	156,206
Eileen A. Mallesch	63,708	79,998	0	0	143,706
Deborah G. Miller	61,208	79,998	0	0	141,206
Carol B. Moerdyk	61,208	79,998	0	0	141,206
Steve Nave	56,208	79,998	0	0	136,206
John C. Orr	97,208	79,998	0	0	177,206


(1)	Includes pay deferred into the Libbey common stock measurement fund pursuant to the Director DCP.

(2)

Represents the grant date fair value, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of awards of stock made to non-management directors on May 16, 2018. On that date, we awarded certain non-management directors stock having a grant date fair value of $6.70 per share. The awards were attributable to service during the preceding year. Pursuant to our stock ownership and retention guidelines for non-management directors, directors are required to hold the net after-tax shares issued for at least one year from the grant date.

(3)

We do not maintain a pension plan for our non-management directors. We do not guarantee any particular rate of return on any pay deferred pursuant to our deferred compensation plans. Dividends on pay deferred into the Libbey Inc. phantom stock or measurement fund under our deferred compensation plans for non-management directors accrue only if and to the extent payable to holders of our common stock. Pay deferred into interest-bearing accounts under our deferred compensation plans for non-management directors does not earn an above-market return, as the applicable interest rate is the yield on ten-year treasuries. Pay deferred into other measurement funds under our deferred compensation plans for non-management directors does not earn an above-market return, as that pay earns a return only if and to the extent that the net asset value of the measurement fund into which the pay is deemed invested actually increases.

2019 Proxy Statement 21

LIBBEY EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

As of March 28, 2019, our executive officers are:



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~ MICHAEL P. BAUER - CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Biographical information for Mr. Bauer appears on page 13.

JAMES C. BURMEISTER - SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Mr. Burmeister, 51, has been Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since June 2018. Mr. Burmeister joined Libbey as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer on March 30, 2017. Mr. Burmeister came to Libbey from The Andersons, Inc. (NASDAQ: ANDE), where he served since 2014 as Vice President, Finance and Treasurer, managing the treasury, tax, investor relations, sourcing, business development and continuous improvement functions. Before joining The Andersons, Inc., Mr. Burmeister held roles of increasing responsibility in operations finance with Owens Corning (NYSE: OC), beginning in 2005 as Director of Finance of the cultured stone business and culminating in his role from 2013-2014 as Vice President, Finance of the roofing and asphalt division. Earlier in his career, Mr. Burmeister served in a variety of roles with General Electric (NYSE: GE), including an assignment with GE's highly regarded Corporate Audit Staff, and with Rubbermaid in its supply chain function. Mr. Burmeister is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and served as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Marine Corps from 1990 to 1995.

JAMES (KLAY) K. HUDDLESTON - SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER
Mr. Huddleston, 48, has been Senior Vice President, Chief Digital Officer since June 2018, having joined Libbey as Vice President, Chief Digital Officer on November 13, 2017. From 2008 until joining Libbey, Mr. Huddleston served as Senior Vice President, Omni-Commerce for Resource/Ammirati, an IBM (NYSE: IBM) consulting agency specializing in brand, commerce, and technology solutions to drive sales and increase customer engagement. Mr. Huddleston previously served as Vice President & General Manager, Direct for Tween Brands from 2006 to 2008 and Director, E-Commerce for Lane Bryant from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Huddleston's earlier career included various marketing and product management positions for Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) from 1998 to 2004.

SUSAN A. KOVACH - SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY
Ms. Kovach, 59, has been Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Libbey Inc. since June 2018. Ms. Kovach was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Libbey Inc. from July 2004 until June 2018, having joined Libbey in December 2003 as Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary. Ms. Kovach was Of Counsel to Dykema Gossett PLLC from 2001 through November 2003. She served from 1997 to 2001 as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (NYSE: OHI) and from 1998 to 2000 as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Omega Worldwide, Inc., a NASDAQ-listed firm. Prior to joining Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., Ms. Kovach was a partner in Dykema Gossett PLLC from 1995 through November 1997 and an associate in Dykema Gossett PLLC from 1985 to 1995.

WILLIAM C. MOSSING - SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF SUPPLY CHAIN OFFICER
Mr. Mossing, 52, has been Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer since June 2018, having joined Libbey as Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer on December 1, 2017. Mr. Mossing came to Libbey from Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, where he served as Vice President, Supply Chain since 2011 and Vice President and General Manager - Modules from 2008 to 2011. Mr. Mossing previously served as Product Line Director from 2006 to 2008 and Assistant General Manager from 2004 to 2008 of Bendix Spicer Foundation Brake LLC, a joint venture of Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC and Dana Corporation. Mr. Mossing's previous experience includes various positions of increasing responsibility in the manufacturing, supply chain, and engineering functions at Dana Corporation, a predecessor to Dana Incorporated (NYSE: DAN).

SARAH J. ZIBBEL - SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER
Ms. Zibbel, 39, has been Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer since June 2018, having joined Libbey in April 2018 as Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer. Ms. Zibbel came to Libbey from Owens-Illinois, Inc. (NYSE: OI), where she most recently served as Vice President, Global Talent, Culture & Organizational Effectiveness since December 2017. Ms. Zibbel's previous positions at Owens-Illinois include Vice President, HR Strategy & Enterprise Transformation from 2016 to December 2017, Vice President, Human Resources, Global Technology and Operations from 2015 to 2016, Director, Corporate Human Resources from 2011 to 2015, and Manager, Corporate Human Resources from 2010 to 2011. Before joining Owens-Illinois, Ms. Zibbel was HR Operations Manager for Rexam PLC from 2009 to 2010, Human Resources Leader at Owens Corning (NYSE: OC) from 2005 to 2009, and Human Resource Director at MedCorp Inc. from 2002 to 2005.

22Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION



PROPOSAL NO. 2
ADVISORY SAY-ON-PAY
We are providing shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote with respect to the following resolution: ~~PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY SAY-ON-PAY VOTE~~RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executives, as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K.	þ
The Board recommends a vote FOR this Proposal	þ

~~We are providing shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote with respect to the following resolution:~~

~~RESOLVED~~, that the shareholders of the Company approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executives, as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K.

Our ~~2016~~2018 executive pay program, discussed below under ~~‘‘Compensation Matters —~~ “Compensation Discussion and ~~Analysis’’~~Analysis” and related tables and narrative, is intended to deliver performance-based, market-driven pay:



~~Pay Objective~~PAY OBJECTIVE		~~Supportive Components of 2016 Pay Program~~SUPPORTIVE COMPONENTS OF 2018 PAY PROGRAM
Support our business strategy; drive long-term performance and shareholder value		•	Annual and long-term incentive plan performance measures focused on growing our business profitably, improving our ability to generate cash, and improving our ~~return on invested capital (ROIC)~~
	adjusted EBITDA •	~~Individual~~ Strategic objectives ~~heavily focused on~~that are closely tied to developing and executing our strategy

Align interests of executives and shareholders		•	Performance-based annual and long-term incentive plans
	•	80% of our ~~CEO's~~CEO’s target pay opportunity is ~~"at-risk"~~
	“at-risk” •	~~Growth in our stock price is required in order to deliver any value to named executives under NQSOs and SARs~~
	•	RSUs directly align interests of executives and shareholders
	•	Stock ~~ownership /~~ retention guidelines designed to require our executives to ~~own~~achieve ownership of meaningful amounts of our stock

Attract and retain highly talented and experienced senior executives who are key to implementing our strategy and achieving future success		•	~~Market-driven total pay package~~
	•	~~NQSO and~~ RSU grants that vest ratably over ~~four~~4 years ~~and special "new hire" awards to attract top talent~~

Align executive pay program with corporate governance best practices		•	Limited perquisites (tax return preparation and financial planning, executive health screening program, limited ground transportation and airline club membership)
	•	Limited severance pay arrangements
	•	~~No regular tax gross-ups except on relocation assistance~~
	•	Stock ~~ownership /~~ retention guidelines designed to require executives to ~~own~~achieve ownership of meaningful amounts of our stock
	•	Annual and long-term incentive awards and RSU ~~SAR and NQSO~~ awards are subject to clawback

We believe that our ~~2016~~2018 executive pay program linked directly to our corporate strategy. The quantitative performance metrics under both our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP and the performance cash component of our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP were tied directly ~~tied~~ to ~~revenue growth,~~ improving our ability to generate cash and improving our ~~return on invested capital, all~~adjusted EBITDA, both of which are critical to achieving our strategic objectives.

Additionally, the ~~reduced~~below-target payouts under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP ~~(limited~~(ranging from 90.3% to ~~69.5%~~99.4% of target ~~before application~~for each of the ~~modifier for individual performance)~~named executives, excluding Mr. Miñarro) and the performance cash component of our ~~2014~~2016 LTIP (at only ~~74.4%~~19.7% of target) ~~directly~~ reflect our financial performance and the Committee's recognition that, even as we increased our return of cash to shareholders in 2016 through share repurchases and dividends, our total shareholder return for the year was (6.0%).performance.

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on Libbey, our Compensation Committee or our Board of Directors. However, we value the opinions of our shareholders, and our Compensation Committee and Board will carefully consider the outcome of this vote.

~~The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR~~

~~the approval, on an advisory basis, of the resolution.~~



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

2019 Proxy Statement 23

Executive Compensation



~~PROPOSAL 3 — SAY-ON-PAY FREQUENCY~~Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This proposal gives shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often we should provide shareholders with future say-on-pay votes. Shareholders may vote to have the say-on-pay vote every year, every two years, or every three years.

~~We believe a say-on-pay vote should be held once each year, as has been conducted by the Company since 2011. This recommendation is based on a number of considerations, including the following:~~

~~In our last frequency advisory vote in 2011, "1 year" received a majority of the votes cast by shareholders.~~

An annual advisory say-on-pay vote allows our shareholders to provide us with their direct input on our executive compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement every year and will be most useful to the Board.

This advisory vote does not bind our Board of Directors. Regardless of the Board's recommendation and the outcome of the shareholder vote on this proposal, our Board may in the future decide to conduct advisory say-on-pay votes on a more or less frequent basis and may vary its practice based on factors such as discussions with shareholders and the adoption of material changes to our executive pay program. The Board will disclose its position on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes no later than August 31, 2017.

~~Shareholders may cast their advisory vote to conduct future advisory say-on-pay votes every "1 Year," "2 Years," or "3 Years," or "Abstain."~~

~~The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR~~

~~holding future say-on-pay votes every "1 YEAR."~~



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

~~Compensation Discussion and Analysis~~

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information regarding our ~~2016~~2018 executive pay program, particularly as it relates to the following individuals, who are our named executives for ~~2016:~~2018:



Named Executive		Title
William A. Foley⁽¹⁾		Executive Chairman and ~~Chief Executive Officer~~
~~Stephanie A. Streeter~~⁽²⁾		former Chief Executive Officer
~~Sherry Buck~~⁽³⁾ James C. Burmeister		~~former~~Senior Vice President, Chief Financial ~~Officer~~
~~Annunciata (Nucci) Cerioli~~		~~Vice President, Chief Supply Chain~~ Officer
Susan A. Kovach		Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Salvador Miñarro Villalobos		Vice President, General Manager, U.S. and Canada until his employment ended on January 15, 2018
~~James H. White~~⁽⁴⁾ William C. Mossing		~~former~~Senior Vice President, Chief ~~Operating~~Supply Chain Officer
Sarah J. Zibbel		Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer


~~(1)~~	~~Effective January 12, 2016.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Ms. Streeter's employment ended January 11, 2016.~~


~~(3)~~	~~Ms. Buck's employment ended December 31, 2016.~~


~~(4)~~	~~Mr. White's employment ended March 31, 2016.~~

~~Executive Summary~~EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

~~Financial and Operational Highlights~~

~~Throughout 2016,~~During 2018, we focused on transforming our business to become a faster-moving, market-focused company with improved margins and greater cash flow. We made substantial operational and organizational improvements to drive strategic priorities, address a number of legacy issues, and better position ourselves for sustainable, profitable growth:

In addition to strengthening our relationships with customers, we ramped up our new product development and conducted significant market research to ensure that we can bring to market the innovative products that our customers want;


•	~~In that connection, we launched two new foodservice stemware collections, Neo and Contour, using our state-of-the-art ClearFire~~^® ~~glass composition;~~

~~We began development of our e-commerce strategy;~~

~~We started our furnace consolidation effort to optimize our capacity footprint and better align our capacity with demand; and~~

~~We streamlined our product portfolio and improved inventory control processes.~~

We believe that the changes made in 2016 and the additional improvements planned for 2017 will create the momentum necessary to strengthen our Company, create consistent growth and increase our future profitability.

~~However, we faced significant headwinds, including:~~

~~In the foodservice channel of distribution, declining restaurant traffic resulting from a continued move away from dining in restaurants to dining at home;~~

~~In the retail channel of distribution, an increasing shift away from brick-and-mortar stores toward e-commerce;~~

~~In all of our channels of distribution, a highly competitive pricing environment;~~

A two-week work stoppage at our Toledo manufacturing facility that negatively impacted gross profit by $4.2 million, net sales by an estimated $7 million to $9 million, and pre-tax income by approximately $7 million to $8 million. Additionally, the estimated lost sales negatively impacted adjusted EBITDA (calculated as shown in Appendices A and B) by approximately $3 million to $4 million;

~~Significant volatility in foreign currency exchange rates, in particular with respect to the Mexican peso and the euro; and~~



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

Prior-year (2015) results that benefited from non-repeating items such as the release in the fourth quarter of 2015 of our U.S. deferred tax valuation allowance, which favorably impacted 2015 net income by approximately $43.8 million.

~~Faced with those challenges, we delivered the following financial results:~~

Although 2016 net sales were $793.4 million, a decrease of 3.5% year-over-year (or a decrease of 1.1% excluding the impact of currency), we achieved an increase in net sales in the foodservice channel. Despite ongoing decline in restaurant traffic trends, our U.S. and Canada foodservice sales grew 2.3%, which we believe indicates that Libbey is continuing to win market share.

~~Net income was $10.1 million in 2016, compared to $66.3 million in 2015.~~


•	~~Our Adjusted EBITDA (calculated as shown on~~ ~~Appendices A~~ ~~and~~ B~~) for 2016 was $109.8 million, compared to $116.1 million in 2015.~~

~~Our stock price decreased from $21.32 on December 31, 2015 to $19.46 on December 31, 2016, reflecting annual total shareholder return (TSR) of (6)%, as shown in the chart on page (ii).~~

~~In addition, we returned $12.1 million~~remained committed to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividends, and we reduced our trade working capital (defined as as net inventory plus net accounts receivable less accounts payable) by $17.3 million compared to the prior year. Trade working capital is calculated as shown in ~~Appendix~~ A.

~~Executive Pay Highlights~~

At our 2016 Annual Meeting of shareholders, our say-on-pay proposal garnered the support of over 98% of the shares voted. Our Compensation Committee interpreted the results of the vote as an affirmation of our executive pay program and, as a result, the Committee generally retained the same structure for our 2016 executive pay program.

~~Notable actions taken by the Committee regarding our named executives' pay for 2016 include:~~

When Mr. Foley was hired as CEO in January, the Committee approved an initial base salary of $825,000, a target SMIP opportunity of 100% and a target LTIP opportunity of 300%, all of which are consistent with the compensation package that had been provided to Ms. Streeter. Because Mr. Foley was retired at the time of his appointment as CEO and intends to retire once again when his employment with Libbey ends (regardless of when or how it ends), the Committee chose not to give Mr. Foley an employment agreement or change in control agreement.

In February, the Committee approved the designs for our 2016 SMIP and the performance cash component of our 2016 LTIP. The 2016 SMIP design uses two performance measures: revenue growth (net sales) and adjusted cash earnings. Like the 2015 LTIP, the performance cash component of the 2016 LTIP is based on a single performance metric: return on invested capital (ROIC). See Appendices A and B for calculations of each of these performance measures.

~~Also in February, the Committee awarded RSUs and NQSOs with ratable, four-year vesting.~~

The Committee approved base salary increases, effective April 1, 2016, equal to 2.0% for each of the named executives other than Ms. Streeter and Mr. White (who were no longer employed by the Company at that date) and Mr. Foley.

~~Effective June 1, 2016, the Committee approved an additional increase in Ms. Cerioli's base salary from $408,002 to $440,004.~~

The below-target payouts under our incentive plans are a direct result of our below-target performance and the Committee's recognition of the fact that, in spite of our increased return of cash to shareholders through share repurchases and increased dividends in 2016, our total shareholder return for the year was (6.0%):


•	The Committee believed it appropriate to limit payouts under our SMIP to no more than 69.5% of target before application of any modifier for individual performance. After application of the modifier for individual performance, no named executive received a payout under the SMIP greater than 69.5%. Adjusted cash earnings is calculated as shown in ~~Appendix B~~.


•	Because our adjusted EBITDA margin and net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio for the 2014-2016 performance cycle were below target, payouts under our 2014 LTIP were only 74.4% of target. Adjusted EBITDA and net debt are calculated as shown in ~~Appendix A~~.

Creating Momentum strategic priorities:



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~ PROFITABLE GROWTH	OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE	ORGANIZATIONAL EXCELLENCE
Improving marketing capabilities in new product development and innovation to drive profitable growth	Improving operating processes, systems and technology	Building winning teams that foster high performance and live our core values

As discussed in the Proxy Statement Summary at page 3, we made significant progress with respect to our strategic priorities, but while we grew top-line revenues, our adjusted EBITDA and cash earnings fell far short of our expectations.

Executive Pay Highlights

~~Key Compensation Practices~~Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, develop and retain global business leaders who can drive financial and strategic objectives and are intended to foster a pay-for-performance culture and maximize long-term shareholder value.

KEY COMPENSATION PRACTICES

For a summary of our key executive compensation practices, including practices we use to drive performance and practices we do not use because we do not believe they would serve our ~~shareholders'~~shareholders’ long-term interests, see page ~~(v)~~8 of the Proxy Statement Summary.

CORE COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

The Compensation Committee strives to provide an executive compensation program that aligns the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. In furtherance of that aim, 50% of our CEO's target pay opportunity is performance-based and 80% of our CEO's target pay opportunity is “at-risk.”

The percentages above represent pay opportunity at target and do not include sign-on awards. "Incentive-Based Pay" includes an annual cash incentive award under our SMIP and long-term performance cash awards under our LTIP. "Time-Based Pay" includes RSUs granted under our LTIP. “NEOs” exclude Mr. Miñarro, whose employment ended January 15, 2018.

24Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

Pay for Performance Alignment

We strive to structure our executive compensation program to align pay with performance. The 2018 compensation of our named executives reflects the Company's performance in multiple respects:

(1) Does not include Mr. Miñarro, whose employment ended January 15, 2018.

BASE SALARY

After Mr. Foley, Mr. Burmeister, Ms. Kovach and Mr. Miñarro voluntarily decreased their base salaries in May of 2017 (a decrease of 10% for Mr. Foley and 5% for each of the other named executives), their base salaries returned to their pre-decrease rates as of January 1, 2018. Mr. Foley's annualized base salary in 2018 was $825,000, the same initial rate established at his time of hire in January 2016. Effective April 1, 2018, Mr. Burmeister and Ms. Kovach received modest base salary increases of 4.0% and 3.0%, respectively. Mr. Mossing did not receive a salary increase in 2018, as he was hired in December 2017. When we hired Ms. Zibbel in April 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an initial base salary of $310,002. Mr. Miñarro did not receive a salary increase, as his employment ended January 15, 2018.

ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE

The annual cash incentive plan adopted by the Committee in February 2018 provided the named executives with the opportunity to earn an award based 65% on financial metrics (40% adjusted cash earnings, 15% e-commerce revenue, 10% new product revenue) and 35% on achievement with respect to certain shared non-financial strategic objectives directly tied to our Creating Momentum strategic priorities. Adjusted cash earnings is calculated as shown inAppendix A. Strong performance with respect to the e-commerce revenue, new product revenue, and strategic objectives components, combined with poor performance with respect to the adjusted cash earnings metric, resulted in payouts of 90.3% to 99.4% to each of the named executives, excluding Mr. Miñarro. Our SMIP has paid out below target each of the last six years, evidencing the rigor of the targets set by the Committee.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Under the long-term incentive plan approved by the Committee in February 2018 for the 2018-2020 performance cycle, 50% of each executive's overall LTIP target opportunity consists of a performance-based cash incentive. The performance cash opportunity under the 2018 LTIP (2018-2020 performance cycle) is based on the Company's adjusted EBITDA, calculated as shown in Appendix A.

The performance cash opportunity under the 2016 LTIP (2016-2018 performance cycle) was based on the Company's ROIC in 2016 and 2017 and the Company's adjusted EBITDA in 2018. The Company's failure to achieve target with respect to these performance measures resulted in payouts under the performance cash component of our 2016 LTIP of only 19.7% of target. This equals the lowest LTIP performance cash score ever under the performance cash component of the Company's long-term incentive plans.

EQUITY AWARDS

Under our 2018 LTIP, named executives were awarded RSUs with ratable, four-year vesting. The RSUs were intended to have an economic value at the time of the award equal to 50% of the applicable executive's overall 2018 LTIP target opportunity. To responsibly manage the limited number of shares remaining available for issuance under our Omnibus Incentive Plans, the Committee elected to modify the method used to determine the number of RSUs to be granted to each executive. This change in methodology resulted in each executive receiving RSUs with an economic value on the grant date 21% to 26% lower than the economic value on the grant date would have been had the Committee used the method employed in prior years. For more information regarding the method used to calculate the number of RSUs to be granted, see "What pay did Libbey's executives receive in 2018? - Equity Compensation."

Demonstrating that our executive's pay is aligned with other shareholders, the value of this equity compensation has been further impacted by our negative total shareholder return. The chart on the following page shows, with respect to the RSUs granted to our CEO and other named executives in 2018, the market value on the grant date and the market value on December 31, 2018. The market value was determined by multiplying the number of RSUs by the closing price of our common stock on the applicable date.

2019 Proxy Statement 25

Executive Compensation

LOOKING AHEAD: 2019 AND BEYOND

Leadership Transition

Michael Bauer

In connection with Mr. Foley's retirement, Michael Bauer succeeded Mr. Foley as our CEO effective March 25, 2019. The Compensation Committee approved a compensation package for Mr. Bauer that includes:

Initial base salary of $675,000;

2019 SMIP target opportunity equal to 100% of actual base earnings;

2019 LTIP target opportunity equal to 225% of annual base salary, consisting of a prorated performance cash target of $696,094 and a grant of 116,827 RSUs with three-year ratable vesting;

Prorated target opportunities under the performance cash components of the 2017 LTIP and 2018 LTIP equal to $189,844 and $442,969, respectively;

To induce Mr. Bauer to join the Company and to establish an immediate and meaningful link to Libbey's long-term stock performance, the Compensation Committee also made Mr. Bauer a new-hire grant of 150,000 non-qualified stock options on March 25, 2019. The options are divided into four groups of 37,500 options each, with one group having an exercise price of $7.00, one group having an exercise price of $8.50, one group having an exercise price of $10.00, and one group having an exercise price of $11.50. This new-hire grant cliff vests on the third anniversary of Mr. Bauer's first day of employment.

In recognition of the fact that Mr. Bauer is relocating from Wisconsin to the Toledo, Ohio, area, he is eligible for relocation assistance under the Company's Senior Executive Relocation Policy.


•	Mr. Bauer does not have an employment agreement. Mr. Bauer is a party to a change in control agreement with the Company and is eligible to participate in the Company's Executive Severance Compensation Policy. Additional information regarding Mr. Bauer's change in control and severance benefits can be found under"Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control" on page 40.

William A. Foley

Mr. Foley will continue to be paid his current salary through March 31, 2019. For his service as Executive Chairman, Mr. Foley will be paid an annual salary of $232,000. Mr. Foley's participation in the 2019 SMIP and the performance cash components of the 2017 LTIP (2017-2019 performance cycle), 2018 LTIP (2018-2020 performance cycle) and 2019 LTIP (2019-2021 performance cycle) will be prorated to March 31, 2019.

Compensation Programs

2019 SMIP

In order to further simplify the plan design and focus the executives on key financial measures and Company-wide strategic objectives, each executive's annual incentive award opportunity under the 2019 SMIP will be based 85% on financial metrics (50% adjusted cash earnings, 20% OTIF and inventory reduction, and 15% new product revenue) and 15% on the shared non-financial strategic objective of ERP implementation.

26Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

2019 LTIP

The Committee elected to maintain the same plan design for the 2019 LTIP as for the 2018 LTIP, including using adjusted EBITDA as the financial metric for the performance cash component and awarding the equity component of the 2019 LTIP entirely in RSUs to conserve shares under its omnibus incentive plans and manage its burn rate in light of the decline in the Company's stock price. In order to responsibly manage the limited number of shares available under the existing Omnibus Incentive Plans, the Committee elected to use the average closing price over the fourth quarter of 2018 to calculate the number of RSUs.

2020 LTIP

If the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan is approved by our shareholders, the Compensation Committee intends, beginning in 2020, to modify the mix of vehicles in our long-term incentive program to include performance shares. While this is the Compensation Committee's current intention, the Committee's ultimate decision as to the plan designs for future long-term incentive programs will depend on a variety of factors and circumstances as existing at the time each applicable program is adopted.

~~Executive Compensation Philosophy~~EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, develop and retain global business leaders who can drive financial and strategic objectives and are intended to foster a pay-for-performance culture and maximize long-term shareholder value.

Our Compensation Committee follows these guiding principles when designing our compensation programs:

Competitiveness - Overall, the mix and levels of compensation should be reasonably comparable to appropriate peer companies so that the Company can continue to attract, retain and motivate high performing executives in an environment where companies are increasingly competing for high-caliber talent. Recognizing that ~~Libbey's~~Libbey’s size, manufacturing asset intensity and multi-channel characteristics make identifying appropriate peer companies especially challenging, the general guideline is to target compensation at the median; however, individual positions may have target compensation mix and/or levels above or below the median depending on an evaluation of relevant factors, including experience, performance, time in position, and what is needed to attract the best talent for key positions, particularly when the Company recruits from much larger companies.

Pay for Performance - Major components of compensation should be tied to the ~~Company's~~Company’s overall performance. Base salary and annual incentive compensation also should be tied to the performance of the individual executive and his or her specific business unit or function.

Values - While the Company’s pay for performance philosophy should reward the achievement of financial and strategic objectives, the manner in which results are achieved is also important in assessing base salary adjustments and annual performance bonus payments. Therefore, while not always directly quantifiable, the manner in which the executive achieves results through collaboration and leadership - in keeping with the Company’s set of core values, notably teamwork, performance, continuous improvement, respect, development, and customer focus - are key considerations in the individual performance review process.

Judgment - In assessing the executive’s contributions to the Company’s performance, the Committee looks to results-oriented performance measures, but also considers the long-term impact of an executive’s decisions. The CEO and Committee use their judgment and experience to evaluate whether an executive’s actions were aligned with the Company’s values and cultural elements.

Accountability for Short- and Long-Term Performance - Annual and long-term incentives should reward an appropriate balance of short- and long-term financial and strategic business results, with an emphasis on managing the business for the long term. Such incentives should have a clear, direct and balanced link to the Company’s financial and strategic objectives.

Alignment to Shareholders’ Interests - Long-term incentives should align the interests of individual executives with the long-term interests of the Company’s shareholders.

Simplicity - The Company strives to the extent practicable to make its compensation programs straightforward, simple to understand, and easy to administer and evaluate for competitiveness and appropriateness.

Reasonableness - Indirect executive compensation programs are designed to be reasonable and appropriate, with executive perquisites applied conservatively but judiciously.

In applying these guiding principles, the Committee seeks to ensure that the Company’s executive compensation programs attract, retain and motivate highly talented executives, support achieving the Company’s financial and strategic objectives, and align with shareholder interests generally.

2019 Proxy Statement 27

~~In what forms did Libbey deliver pay to its executives in 2016, and what purposes do the various forms of pay serve?~~

~~Generally the structure of our 2016 executive pay program remained the same as our 2015 executive pay program in that the components of pay, and the weight accorded each component, remained the same.~~



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

Executive Compensation

~~Core Compensation Elements:~~ WHAT ARE THE ELEMENTS OF LIBBEY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM?

Balanced Program with Significant Pay Atat Risk

The core elements of compensation for which our executives were eligible in ~~2016~~2018 were base salary, an annual cash incentive award under our SMIP, and long-term cash incentive and equity awards under our LTIP. For ~~2016,~~2018, the pay opportunities of our named executives were designed to provide a balance of stable and competitive pay in the form of base salary, welfare and retirement benefits and perquisites; equity-based compensation ~~(NQSOs and RSUs)~~(RSUs) that aligns our executives’ interests with those of shareholders generally and also serves as a retention tool; ~~and equity-based compensation~~ and annual and long-term incentive awards that are designed to motivate our executives to execute our strategy, thereby driving our financial and operational performance. ~~The charts below show~~In devising and administering the ~~mix of~~executive compensation program, the Committee weighs objectives, including talent attraction and retention, alignment with shareholder interests, and closely tying pay with performance, recognizing that these ~~pay elements and reflect the substantial portions of our named executives’ target pay opportunities that are at risk.~~objectives often compete with one another.

CORE COMPENSATION ELEMENTS



~~Foley Pay Opportunity at Target~~		~~Other Named Executives' Pay Opportunity at Target~~⁽¹⁾


~~(1)~~	~~Excludes Ms. Streeter, our former CEO, whose employment ended January 11, 2016.~~



Type of Pay	Element	Key Characteristics	Objectives

Base salary	Base salary	Fixed component; reviewed annually	~~Talent attraction~~Attract and ~~retention~~retain talent

Incentive-Based Pay	Annual cash incentive award under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP	At-risk variable pay opportunity for short-term performance; no guaranteed minimum payout; maximum payout equal to ~~225%~~200% of ~~target~~target; payout is based 40% on adjusted cash earnings, 15% on e-commerce revenue, 10% on new product revenue, and 35% on strategic objectives	~~Talent attraction~~Attract and ~~retention; motivation; alignment~~retain talent; motivate; align with key business and financial objectives and strategies; ~~alignment~~align with shareholder interests

	Long-term performance cash incentive awards under our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP	Formula-driven, at-risk cash award that comprises ~~40%~~50% of LTIP opportunity; no guaranteed minimum payout; maximum payout equal to 200% of ~~target~~target; payout based on adjusted EBITDA	~~Talent attraction~~Attract and ~~retention; motivation; alignment~~retain talent; motivate; align with key business and financial objectives and strategies; ~~alignment~~align with shareholder interests

Time-Based Pay	~~NQSOs granted under our 2016 LTIP~~	Comprise 20% of LTIP opportunity; exercise price equal to closing stock price on grant date; generally awarded annually; vest ratably over four years beginning on a date not earlier than the first anniversary of the date the award is approved; expire ten years from grant date	~~Talent attraction and retention; motivation; alignment with shareholder interests~~

	RSUs granted under our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP	~~Comprise 40%~~Intended to comprise 50% of LTIP opportunity; at risk; vest ratably over four years beginning on a date not earlier than the first anniversary of the date the award is approved; no dividends or voting rights with respect to unvested RSUs	~~Talent attraction~~Attract and ~~retention; motivation; alignment~~retain talent; motivate; align with shareholder interests

OTHER COMPENSATION ELEMENTS



Element	Key Characteristics	Objectives
Perquisites	Direct payment or reimbursement of personal financial planning and tax return preparation fees; annual executive health screening and related services; ground transportation for trips between Toledo, Ohio, and the Detroit/Wayne County Metropolitan airport for the executive when traveling for business purposes and the executive's spouse when traveling together; membership in one airline club of the executive's choice; for executives relocating at Libbey's request, moving and related expenses associated with the move (may also include loss-on-sale protection when necessary to attract talent); and, for Mr. Foley until April 24, 2019, a housing allowance for housing in the Toledo, Ohio, area since his primary residence is in the Cleveland, Ohio, area	Attract and retain talent

Welfare and retirement benefits	Medical, dental and life insurance benefits for U.S. executives on the same basis as for all U.S. salaried employees; matching contributions to our 401(k) savings plan on the same basis as for all U.S. salaried employees; for Ms. Kovach only, retirement benefits under our Salary Plan (a qualified retirement plan for all U.S. salaried employees hired before January 1, 2006) and our Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan ("SERP") (an excess, non-qualified plan designed to provide substantially identical retirement benefits as the Salary Plan to the extent the Salary Plan cannot provide those benefits due to IRS limitations; no enhanced credit has ever been provided). Company contribution credits under the Salary Plan and the SERP were discontinued at the end of 2012	Attract and retain talent

Limited Income Protection	Separation benefits under change in control agreements or our executive severance policy; contingent component payable only if employment is terminated under specified circumstances	Attract and retain talent

28Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

WHAT PAY DID LIBBEY’S EXECUTIVES RECEIVE FOR 2018?

Base Salary



SALARY HIGHLIGHTS	• No salary increase for CEO • No salary increases for recently hired executives • 3% - 4% salary increases for certain other named executives

The named executives' annualized base salary rates are:



Named Executive		Annualized Base Salary ($)
W. Foley		825,000
J. Burmeister		390,000
S. Kovach		364,154
S. Miñarro		362,397
W. Mossing		300,000
S. Zibbel		310,002

After Mr. Foley, Mr. Burmeister, Ms. Kovach and Mr. Miñarro voluntarily decreased their base salaries in May of 2017 (a decrease of 10% for Mr. Foley and 5% for each of the other executives), their base salaries returned to their pre-decrease rates as of January 1, 2018. Mr. Foley's annualized base salary in 2018 was $825,000, the same initial rate established at his time of hire in January 2016. In February 2018, the Compensation Committee approved modest base salary increases of 4.0% for Mr. Burmeister and 3.0% for Ms. Kovach. In authorizing these increases, the Committee considered the need to retain these high-performing leaders and the significant contributions that Mr. Burmeister and Ms. Kovach have made and are expected to continue to make toward achieving the Company's strategic initiatives. These increases were effective April 1, 2018, and are included in the rates above. Mr. Miñarro did not receive a salary increase because his employment ended January 15, 2018. Mr. Mossing did not receive a salary increase in 2018, as he was hired in December 2017. When we hired Ms. Zibbel in April 2018, the Committee approved the initial base salary shown above.

Annual Cash Incentive Award under our SMIP



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~SMIP HIGHLIGHTS	• Annual Cash Incentive Award • Based 40% on Company's adjusted cash earnings, 15% on e-commerce revenue, 10% on new product revenue, and 35% on performance against strategic objectives • Named executives (excluding Mr. Miñarro) received below-target payouts ranging from 90.3% to 99.4%

The Compensation Committee approved our 2018 SMIP design and approved the SMIP target opportunity for each named executive, other than Ms. Zibbel, in February 2018. Ms. Zibbel's SMIP target opportunity was approved at the time of her hire.

TARGET OPPORTUNITIES

Each of our named executives had a target opportunity under the 2018 SMIP equal to a percentage of his or her actual base salary earned in 2018.

In setting the named executives’ target opportunities under the 2018 SMIP, the Compensation Committee elected not to increase the target opportunities from the prior-year plan for any of the named executives.



Named Executive	Target Award as a Percent of Full-Year Base Salary	Target Award based on Actual Full-Year Base Salary ($)
W. Foley	100%	825,000
J. Burmeister	60%	231,750
S. Kovach	50%	180,752
W. Mossing	50%	150,000
S. Zibbel	50%	114,313

2019 Proxy Statement 29

Executive Compensation

PLAN DESIGN

In designing our 2018 SMIP, the Committee sought a design that, compared to our 2017 SMIP, was less complex and more keenly focused on metrics essential to executing our Creating Momentum strategy, and that more closely aligned the efforts of the individual executives. The Committee felt it was important, however, to continue to directly incent the executives to focus their efforts on critical objectives supporting our Creating Momentum strategy, recognizing that the benefits of those objectives may not be reflected in improvements to the Company's financial performance until future years. The Committee also considered the need to maintain motivation among the management team and retain high-performing leaders after a period of significant turnover among the senior leadership team and several years of below-target payouts. For these reasons, the Committee maintained certain metrics and objectives but abandoned the individual strategic objectives and variable weighting aspects of the previous year's SMIP in favor of the following:

Financial Metrics (65% of Target Opportunity)

Adjusted Cash Earnings (40% of Target Opportunity)

The target and payout scale for the Company adjusted cash earnings performance metric was:



Adjusted Cash Earnings
Full-Year Adjusted Cash Earnings (dollars in thousands)		Percent of Targeted Cash Earnings	Performance Level	Payout Percentage
	$103,557	110.0%	Maximum	200%
	$94,143	100.0%	Target	100%
	$75,314	80.0%	Threshold	50%
< $75,314		< 80.0%	Below Threshold	0%

The 2018 adjusted cash earnings target of $94.1 million was lower than the adjusted cash earnings target under our 2017 SMIP, but 58% higher than the Company's 2017 actual adjusted cash earnings of $59.4 million. The Committee believed that the 2018 adjusted cash earnings target was a sufficiently challenging goal because it reflected a significant increase over the Company's actual adjusted cash earnings for 2017 and, when this target was established in early 2018, the Company expected adjusted cash earnings to be affected by costs associated with implementation of a new global ERP system, investments in e-commerce and new product development, planned furnace rebuilds, and a continued challenging competitive environment. The degree of difficulty required for the Company to achieve target performance with respect to the adjusted cash earnings metric in its annual incentive plan is evidenced by historical results: the Company has failed to achieve target with respect to the adjusted cash earnings performance metric of its annual incentive plans for the past three years.

Under the 2018 SMIP, the Committee may adjust actual results to exclude the impact of special items. Examples of special items for which adjustments may be made include restructuring charges, asset impairment charges, and other similar items that are either not foreseen or are foreseen but are not included in the Company's annual operating plan because the occurrence of the event is substantially uncertain at the time the annual operating plan is submitted to the Board. The Committee believes such adjustments are appropriate so that our executives' pay will not be impacted, positively or negatively, by special items that are not a reflection of our core operating performance. As explained in further detail below, and as shown in the calculations set forth on attached Appendix A, the Committee adjusted cash

30Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

earnings to reflect certain reorganization charges. The adjustment to cash earnings had no effect on the payout percentage for the metric, as adjusted cash earnings remained below the threshold level required for any payout.

The Committee believed that it was appropriate to adjust cash earnings (calculated as set forth on attached Appendix A) by the following item that did not reflect our core operating performance and were not anticipated or budgeted. As a result, the Committee adjusted cash earnings (calculated as set forth on attached Appendix A) by the following item:



Item		Amount of Adjustment to Company-Wide Cash Earnings ($)
Costs Related to Strategic Initiative		2,341,000
Total		2,341,000

After accounting for this adjustment, adjusted cash earnings was $68.6 million, or 72.8% of targeted adjusted cash earnings for the year. Based on the payout scale above, adjusted cash earnings was below threshold, resulting in no payout for the named executives with respect to the adjusted cash earnings component of the SMIP.

E-Commerce Revenue (15% of Target Opportunity)

Success under the e-commerce revenue component of the 2018 SMIP is based on the total gross revenue from products sold through all e-commerce accounts. The target and payout scale for the e-commerce revenue performance metric was:



E-Commerce Revenue
Full-Year E-Commerce Revenue (represented as % increase vs. prior year)	Percent of Targeted E-Commerce Revenue	Performance Level	Payout Percentage
67%	125%	Maximum	200%
33%	100%	Target	100%
20%	90%	Threshold	50%
< 20%	< 90%	Below Threshold	0%

The Committee felt the e-commerce revenue target was sufficiently challenging because it represented a significant increase over the prior year's e-commerce revenue target and the e-commerce revenue actually achieved in the prior year.

The Company achieved a 34% increase in gross e-commerce revenue as compared to the prior year, resulting in a payout score of 100% based on the scale above.

New Product Revenue (10% of Target Opportunity)

The new product revenue performance measure under the 2018 SMIP consists of gross revenue from new products launched in the previous 36 months on a rolling basis. The Committee chose new product revenue as a performance measure to encourage progress toward the Company's long-term goal to have new products make up 8% to 9% of the Company's sales. The new product revenue metric in the 2018 SMIP is not comparable to the innovation and new product development metric included in the 2017 SMIP. When designing the 2018 SMIP, the Committee redefined the metric to encompass new products launched in the previous 36 months on a rolling basis. This form of measure acknowledges that, due to the length of the new product development cycle from initial innovation to market penetration, revenue benefits from new products take time to achieve.

The target and payout scale for the new product revenue performance metric was:



New Product Gross Revenue
Full-Year New Product Gross Revenue (dollars in thousands)		Percent of Targeted New Product Gross Revenue	Performance Level	Payout Percentage
	$59,840	110.0%	Maximum	200%
	$54,000	100.0%	Target	100%
	$48,960	90.0%	Threshold	50%
< $48,960		< 90.0%	Below Threshold	0%

The Company achieved $58.5 million in gross revenue from new products, resulting in a payout score of 170% based on the scale above.

2019 Proxy Statement 31

Executive Compensation

Strategic Objectives (35% of Target Opportunity)

The strategic objectives component of the 2018 SMIP consisted of three equally weighted strategic objectives that were shared by all executives. For each objective, the named executives were evaluated and scored as a group, such that all applicable named executives received the same rating for the objective. The targets were established by the Committee early in 2018 and the Company's performance with respect to the objectives was evaluated and scored by the Committee in February 2019.

The tables below describe each of the strategic objectives, their link to our Creating Momentum strategy, the types of measures, targets, and the Company's performance with respect to the objective as determined by the Committee at its February 2019 meeting.



ERP Planning and Implementation

Strategy Link:	Supports operational excellence and profitable growth	Threshold	Target	Maximum	Actual Performance
ERP investment is critical to driving future top-line growth and margin improvement. We anticipate that, once fully implemented, our ERP will help us achieve annual run-rate benefits of $15 - $20 million.		Execute one milestone, within budget	Execute two milestones, within budget	Execute three milestones, within budget	Executed one milestone, within budget
Measure:	Qualitative	(3 rating)	(4 rating)	(5 rating)	3 rating



Service Levels

Strategy Link:	Supports profitable growth	Threshold	Target	Maximum	Actual Performance
Providing exceptional service differentiates us from our competitors. We believe superior service will help us accelerate our growth, gain stronger product placement, and enhance margins in the long term.		83%	86%	90%	90%
Measure:	Percent of customer orders filled on time and in full	(2 rating)	(3 rating)	(5 rating)	5 rating



Individual and Leader Development

Strategy Link:	Supports organizational excellence	Threshold	Target	Maximum	Actual Performance
To ensure our success, our people must be strong and effective leaders who embody the right skill sets and capabilities to execute our strategy. By developing our leaders, we are preparing for continued growth as an organization, building our succession plans, and embracing a new and ever-changing workforce.		Assess 50% of leaders; train supervisors at manufacturing sites; complete development plans for 75% of salaried employees	Assess 75% of leaders; train supervisors at manufacturing sites + a non-manufacturing site; development plans for > 75% of salaried employees	Assess all leaders; train supervisors at all locations; complete development plans for all salaried employees	Assessed all leaders; trained all supervisors; completed development plans for all salaried employees


Measure:	Qualitative	(3 rating)	(4 rating)	(5 rating)	5 rating

At its meeting in February 2019, the Committee reviewed the Company's performance with respect to the strategic objectives. After meeting in executive session, the Committee determined the Company's scores with respect to each shared objective. The weighted rating of the overall strategic objectives was converted to a payout score of 166.7% based on the following scale:



Strategic Objectives
Overall Rating		Payout Percentage
above 4.5		176% - 200%
4.1 - 4.5		151% - 175%
3.6 - 4.0		126% - 150%
3.1 - 3.5		101% - 125%
2.6 - 3.0		76% - 100%
2.0 - 2.5		51% - 75%
below 2.0		0% - 50%

32Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

~~Other~~SMIP PAYOUTS

Based on the payout scores for each of the plan components and the weight assigned to each component, the total payout score under the 2018 SMIP, unadjusted for any individual performance, was 90.3% of target.



Component	Payout Score	Weight	Weighted Payout Score	Total Unadjusted Payout Score
Adjusted Cash Earnings	0%	40%	0.0%	90.3%
E-Commerce Revenue	100%	15%	15.0%
New Product Revenue	170%	10%	17.0%
Strategic Objectives	166.7%	35%	58.3%

Under the 2017 SMIP, the Committee did not retain discretion to modify a participant's payout based on individual performance, as the 2017 SMIP design included an individual objectives component. Because the 2018 SMIP design did not include an individual objectives component, the Committee retained discretion to adjust a participant's individual payout (up or down) based on individual performance. As a result, an executive who demonstrated exceptional performance may be awarded a payout greater than the payout based strictly on the shared financial and strategic objectives. Alternatively, an executive whose individual performance did not meet expectations may be awarded a payout less than the payout that is based strictly on Company-wide performance measures. Applying the individual performance modifier also ensures that the executive's compensation is based not only on the goals achieved, but also on the extent to which the executive demonstrates effective organizational leadership skills in the execution of our strategy.

The Committee received input from Mr. Foley regarding the other named executives' individual performance review scores, including an evaluation of the extent to which they achieved their individual objectives. After meeting in executive session with Exequity, the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the Committee determined that, based on their extraordinary efforts and leadership in connection with a strategic initiative that we terminated in the third quarter of 2018, the payouts for each of Mr. Foley, Mr. Burmeister and Ms. Kovach should be increased 10%.

Accordingly, the named executives received the following payouts under the SMIP:



	Target Award		Actual Payout
Named Executive	As Percent of Full-Year Base Salary	Based on Actual Full-Year Base Salary ($)	As Percent of Target	Actual Award ($)
W. Foley	100%	825,000	99.4%	819,775
J. Burmeister	60%	231,750	99.4%	230,282
S. Kovach	50%	180,752	99.4%	179,607
W. Mossing	50%	150,000	90.3%	135,500
S. Zibbel	50%	114,313	90.3%	103,263

Long-Term Performance-Based Compensation ~~Elements~~



LTIP HIGHLIGHTS	• Long-term performance cash incentive award • Based on Company's adjusted ROIC for 2016 and 2017 and adjusted EBITDA for 2018 • Below target payout of 19.7% for 2016 LTIP (for the 2016-2018 performance cycle) • 2017 LTIP (for 2017-2019 performance cycle) and 2018 LTIP (for 2018-2020 performance cycle) both tracking below target

In ~~addition~~2018, each named executive’s long-term incentive opportunity included a cash-based performance component and an award of RSUs. The long-term incentive opportunity is intended to have an aggregate economic value equal to a target percentage of the executive’s base salary. The Committee did not increase the target opportunities from the 2017 LTIP for any of the named executives. The table below sets forth the target percentage for each of the named executives in 2018. Mr. Miñarro was not a participant in the 2018 LTIP because his employment ended January 15, 2018.



Named Executive		2018 Target Long-Term Award as a Percentage of Annualized Base Salary
W. Foley		300%
J. Burmeister		100%
S. Kovach		95%
W. Mossing		70%
S. Zibbel		70%

2019 Proxy Statement 33

Executive Compensation

The Committee believes cash is the appropriate vehicle for the performance component of the long-term incentive plans. While the Committee has considered the use of performance-based equity awards, the Committee continues to use performance-based cash because of the need to conserve shares under its Omnibus Incentive Plans and manage the Company's burn rate in light of the decline in the Company's stock price. If the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan is approved by our shareholders, the Compensation Committee intends, beginning in 2020, to modify the mix of vehicles in our long-term incentive program to include performance shares. While this is the Compensation Committee's current intention, the Committee's ultimate decision as to the ~~core elements described above,~~plan designs for future long-term incentive programs will depend on a variety of factors and circumstances as existing at the time each applicable program is adopted.

The cash-based performance opportunity provided to our named executives ~~were also eligible~~ for ~~limited perquisites, welfare~~performance during 2018 consisted of the following components:

A performance component under our 2016 LTIP (for the 2016-2018 performance cycle) that provides for cash awards if and ~~retirement benefits,~~to the extent we achieve our targeted adjusted return on invested capital (ROIC) for each of 2016 and ~~separation benefits,~~2017 and our targeted adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) for 2018; a performance component under our 2017 LTIP (for the 2017-2019 performance cycle) that provides for cash awards if and to the extent we achieve our targeted adjusted ROIC for 2017 and our targeted adjusted EBITDA for each of 2017 and 2018; a performance component under our 2018 LTIP (for the 2018-2020 performance cycle) that provides for cash awards if and to the extent we achieve our targeted adjusted EBITDA for each of the three 1-year performance periods included in the three-year performance cycle. The scale used to determine the payout score for each of the three 1-year performance periods is reset for each performance period to correlate with targeted adjusted ROIC or targeted adjusted EBITDA, as applicable, for that year. The amount of the final payout, if any, will be determined based on the average of the three discrete, single-year payout scores. In deciding to set annual goals instead of three-year goals, the Committee considered the extreme difficulty in forecasting three years ahead in the volatile economic environment (as evidenced by our inability to achieve target performance under our annual incentive plans over the past five years) and the need to keep management engaged as the Company faces that challenging environment.


◦	For any performance cycle of which 2016 is a part, our 2016 adjusted ROIC target was 10.8%. We achieved adjusted ROIC of 9.9% in 2016, resulting in a payout score for the 2016 calendar year of 59%, as determined according to the following scale:



Basis Points Above or Below 2016 Targeted Adjusted ROIC		Payout Score
+100		200%
0		100%
-150		25%
Less than -150		0%


◦	For any performance cycle of which 2017 is a part, our 2017 adjusted ROIC target was 9.2%. We achieved 2017 adjusted ROIC of 3.1%, resulting in a payout score for the 2017 calendar year of 0%, as determined according to the following scale:



Basis Points Above or Below 2017 Targeted Adjusted ROIC		Payout Score
+50		200%
0		100%
-100		50%
Less than -100		0%

◦

For any performance cycle of which 2018 is a part, our 2018 adjusted EBITDA target was $89.8 million. In setting the target, the Committee considered the Company's prior year performance and alignment with the Company's annual operating plan and long-term strategic initiatives. The volatile global economy, decline in restaurant traffic, shift in retail sales toward e-commerce, and competitive pricing environment of 2017 were expected to continue in 2018. The realities of the business environment led the Company to shift its priorities from aggressive growth toward improving marketing and new product development capabilities and innovation, improving customer relationships, and simplifying the business - all of which would support future, sustainable, profitable growth. The Committee believed that an adjusted EBITDA target of $89.8 million would prove sufficiently challenging to achieve. In February 2019, the Committee determined that we had achieved 2018 adjusted EBITDA of $72.5 million, resulting in a payout score for the 2018 calendar year of 0%, as determined according to the following scale:



Percent of 2018 Targeted Adjusted EBITDA		Payout Score
112.5%		200%
0		100%
87.5%		50%
Less than 87.5%		0%

Adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA are calculated as set forth on Appendix A.

34Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

When the Committee initially adopted the 2016 LTIP and 2017 LTIP, the Committee believed that using adjusted ROIC as a performance measure would align with the long-term interests of our shareholders because of adjusted ROIC's relationship to total shareholder return. In February 2018, the Committee elected to use adjusted EBITDA as the financial metric for the performance cash component of the 2018 LTIP and modified the performance cash components of the 2016 LTIP and 2017 LTIP to provide that the performance metric for the 2018 and 2019 plan years would be based on adjusted EBITDA as opposed to ROIC. The Committee transitioned from adjusted ROIC to adjusted EBITDA for the following reasons:

The Committee recognized that the large investments needed in connection with our ERP implementation, our e-commerce platform and new product development, all of which ~~support~~are essential to our ~~objective~~Creating Momentum strategic priorities, were unlikely to ~~attract~~generate significant returns until future years;

Given the asset intensity of our business, as well as our relatively high degree of financial leverage, the Committee believes that adjusted EBITDA is an appropriate measure of core operating performance;

The Committee felt it was imperative to re-focus management on the primary drivers of cash earnings;

Adjusted EBITDA is regularly used by the Company internally to measure profitability; and ~~retain talented executives.~~

~~Perquisites:~~ ~~Direct payment or reimbursement of personal financial planning~~We believe adjusted EBITDA is used by investors, analysts and ~~tax return preparation fees; annual executive physical examination~~other interested parties in comparing our performance across reporting periods and ~~related services; ground transportation for trips between Toledo, Ohio,~~in comparing Libbey to other companies with different capital and legal structures.

Despite transitioning from adjusted ROIC to adjusted EBITDA, the ~~Detroit, Wayne County Metropolitan airport~~Company still failed to achieve threshold performance for the ~~executive when traveling~~2018 calendar year.

In February 2019, the Compensation Committee reviewed our performance for ~~business purposes~~the three-year performance cycle ended December 31, 2018, and, based on the ~~executive's spouse when traveling together; membership~~average of the three discrete payout scores for each of 2016, 2017 and 2018, determined that we had achieved an overall payout score of 19.7% of target under the 2016 LTIP.



		Payout Score
2016 calendar year		59%
2017 calendar year		0%
2018 calendar year		0%
Overall Payout Score		19.7%

Performance cash payouts under our LTIP are not subject to modifications based on individual performance. Payouts were prorated, however, for those executives who were not employed for the entire 2016-2018 performance period.

The final payout amounts received by the named executives under the performance cash component of the 2016 LTIP were:



Named Executive	2016 LTIP Cash Target ($)	2016 LTIP Cash Payout ($)	2016 LTIP Cash Payout as a Percentage of Target
W. Foley	990,000	195,030	19.7%
J. Burmeister⁽¹⁾	87,900	17,316	19.7%
S. Kovach	127,878	25,192	19.7%
S. Miñarro⁽¹⁾	114,421	22,541	19.7%
W. Mossing⁽¹⁾	30,324	5,974	19.7%
S. Zibbel⁽¹⁾	21,700	4,275	19.7%


(1)	Prorated to reflect the portion of the performance cycle during which the named executive was employed.

Equity Compensation



EQUITY HIGHLIGHTS	• Annual awards under LTIP • Economic value of RSUs at time of award intended to equal 50% of LTIP target opportunity • 4-year ratable vesting

In February 2018, the Compensation Committee awarded to participants in ~~one airline club~~our 2018 LTIP RSUs having an intended economic value at the time of award equal to 50% of their target long-term incentive opportunities. The RSUs vest ratably over four years beginning on February 17, 2019, except for awards to Ms. Zibbel, which vest ratably over four years beginning on April 5, 2019.

The Committee elected to award the equity component of the 2018 LTIP entirely in RSUs to conserve shares under the Company's Omnibus Incentive Plans and manage its burn rate in light of the decline in the Company's stock price. If the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan is approved, the Compensation Committee intends, beginning in 2020, to modify the mix of vehicles in our long-term incentive program to include performance shares. While this is the Compensation Committee's current intention, the Committee's ultimate decision as to the plan designs for future long-term incentive programs will depend on a variety of factors and circumstances as existing at the time each applicable program is adopted. For more information regarding the proposed

2019 Proxy Statement 35

Executive Compensation

Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, see "Equity Compensation Plan Information - Proposal No. 3" beginning on page 60.

Historically, the Committee determined the number of RSUs actually awarded by dividing the intended economic value (50% of the executive's ~~choice;~~target long-term incentive opportunity) by the "trailing 20-day average," the average closing price of our common stock over a period of 20 consecutive trading days ending on the grant date. However, to further conserve shares available for issuance under our Omnibus Incentive Plans, the Committee elected to calculate the number of RSUs to be granted under the 2018 LTIP by dividing the intended economic value by the greater of: (a) the trailing 20-day average; or (b) the average closing price of our common stock over the fourth quarter of 2017 (the "Q4 2017 average"). Ultimately, the Q4 2017 average of $7.75 was used because it was higher than the trailing 20-day average ($5.74 for the grant to Ms. Zibbel and $6.15 for the grants to the other named executives). This change in methodology resulted in each executive receiving RSUs with an economic value on the grant date 21% to 26% lower than the economic value on the grant date would have been if the Committee had used the trailing 20-day average method as in prior years.

In choosing to modify the method used to calculate the number of RSUs to be issued, the Committee weighed the need to responsibly manage the shares available under the Company's Omnibus Incentive Plans against the potential retention challenges that may be created by reducing the total compensation opportunities provided to executives ~~relocating at Libbey's request, moving and related expenses associated with~~as a result of the ~~move (may also include loss-on-sale protection when necessary to attract talent); and, for Mr. Foley, a housing allowance for housing~~reduction in the ~~Toledo, Ohio, area since his primary residence~~economic value of the RSUs delivered.

Sign-on Awards

In connection with her hire, Ms. Zibbel was awarded a $100,000 cash sign-on bonus and an award of 10,000 RSUs to induce her to join the Company and to replace the value of compensation being forfeited at her previous employer. If Ms. Zibbel resigns without Good Reason before April 5, 2019 (when she has been employed by Libbey for one year), she must repay the entire cash sign-on bonus within 30 days of her date of termination. “Good Reason” is indefined on page 42. The sign-on RSUs awarded to Ms. Zibbel cliff vest on April 5, 2021, the ~~Cleveland, Ohio, metropolitan area.~~

~~Welfare and retirement benefits: M~~edical, dental and life insurance benefits for U.S. executives on the same basis as for all U.S. salaried employees; matching contributions to our 401(k) savings plan on the same basis as for all U.S. salaried employees; and, forthird anniversary of Ms. Kovach only, retirement benefits under our Salary Plan (a qualified retirement plan for all U.S. salaried employees hired before January 1, 2006) and our Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan ("SERP") (an excess, non-qualified plan designed to promote substantially identical retirement benefits as the Salary Plan to the extent the Salary Plan cannot provide those benefits due to IRS limitations; no enhanced credit has ever been provided). Company contribution credits under the Salary Plan and the SERP were discontinued at the endZibbel's date of ~~2012.~~

~~Limited income protection:~~ ~~Separation benefits under employment agreements, change in control agreements or our executive severance policy; payable only if employment is terminated under specified circumstances.~~hire.

~~How does Libbey determine the forms and amounts of executive pay?~~HOW DOES LIBBEY DETERMINE THE FORMS AND AMOUNTS OF EXECUTIVE PAY?

Participants and Tools

The Compensation Committee, consisting entirely of independent directors, is responsible for overseeing the design, development and implementation of our executive pay program. Each year, the Compensation Committee evaluates Libbey's executive compensation program to determine what, if any, changes are appropriate. In making these determinations, the Committee may consult with its independent compensation consultant, management and the Board, as described below; however, the Compensation Committee uses its own judgment in making final decisions regarding the compensation paid to our executives.

The Compensation Committee consults with its independent executive compensation consultant when determined to be appropriate by the Compensation Committee. In ~~2016,~~2018, the Compensation Committee retained Exequity, LLP to serve as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. A representative of Exequity attended the majority of the meetings of the Compensation Committee in 2018, including the February ~~2016~~2018 and February ~~2017~~2019 meetings at which the Compensation Committee made decisions regarding our executive pay program for ~~2016~~2018 and also advised the Committee in connection with other pay decisions made during the year. All expenses that we incurred in ~~2016~~2018 for services provided by Exequity were attributable to services provided by Exequity to the Compensation Committee in connection with its executive pay decisions.

In compliance with the NYSE ~~MKT~~American Company Guide's disclosure requirements regarding compensation consultant independence, Exequity provided the Compensation Committee with a letter addressing each of six independence factors. Their responses affirm the independence of Exequity and the partners, consultants, and employees who service the Compensation Committee on executive compensation matters.

Our CEO, our Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer and our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary attend meetings of, and provide information to, the Compensation Committee and its consultant to assist them in their pay determinations. In addition, management may request that the Compensation Committee convene a meeting, and management may communicate with the Compensation Committee’s consultant to provide the consultant with information or understand the views of, or request input from, the consultant as to pay proposals being submitted by management to the Committee. However, the Compensation Committee meets in executive session, without any member of management present, to discuss and make its final ~~decisions with respect to our~~ executive ~~compensation program.~~pay determinations.

Our non-CEO executives play no direct role in determining their own pay, except to the extent they assess their own performance against their individual performance objectives as part of our performance appraisal process and to the extent



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

that the Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and the Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary provide information to the Compensation Committee with respect to pay programs affecting the entire executive leadership team.

The Compensation Committee sets the performance goals for our SMIP and LTIP based upon input from our CEO, including suggested individual performance objectives and metrics under the SMIP and the performance cash component of the LTIP. In setting our corporate performance objectives and measures, the Committee seeks input from its independent consultant. The Committee also seeks input from our Board in setting our CEO’s individual performance objectives and metrics.

~~Internal Pay Equity and Wealth Accumulation.~~36Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

INTERNAL PAY EQUITY AND WEALTH ACCUMULATION

In determining awards for current and future performance periods, the Compensation Committee considers internal pay equity within the senior leadership team, but does not consider the impact of, or wealth accumulated as a result of, equity awards made during prior years, since those awards represent pay for services rendered during prior-year periods.

~~Tally Sheets.~~TALLY SHEETS

In connection with the preparation of our proxy statement each year, the Committee reviews ~~‘‘tally sheets’’~~“tally sheets” that summarize, for each executive officer, the compensation paid and equity grants awarded during the prior year, as well as the amounts that would have been payable to each executive officer if ~~the executive officer’s~~his or her employment had been terminated under a variety of scenarios as of December 31 of the prior year. The Committee uses these ~~‘‘tally~~“tally sheets,’’” which are prepared by management and provide substantially the same information as is provided in the tables in this proxy statement, primarily to ensure that our executives’ estimated pay is consistent with the Committee’s intent in adopting the program and for reviewing internal pay equity within the senior leadership team.

~~Benchmarking and Peer Groups.~~ ~~The Compensation Committee did not rely on peer group benchmarking in setting 2016 compensation.~~ BENCHMARKING AND PEER GROUPS

The Compensation Committee engages its independent consultant to conduct a full benchmarking study of the ~~Company's~~Company’s executive compensation and that of its peers approximately every other year. Because the Committee uses benchmarking studies as a reference point, and not the sole determinative factor, in setting executive compensation, the Committee does not conduct benchmarking on an annual basis. As disclosed in the proxy statement filed in connection with our ~~2016~~2018 Annual Meeting, Exequity conducted a full benchmarking study in the fall of ~~2014, which~~2016, and the Compensation Committee considered the results of the study, in combination with many other factors, in setting our executives' pay opportunities for ~~2015.~~2017. Consistent with its biennial benchmarking practice, the Compensation Committee did not conduct a compensation benchmarking study in 2017 and did not rely on peer group benchmarking in setting 2018 compensation. The Committee conducted a full benchmarking study in the fall of 2018 for use as a point of reference when setting executive pay opportunities for 2019.

~~Say-on-Pay Results.~~ AtSAY-ON-PAY RESULTS AND SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Our annual say-on-pay vote is one of our ~~2016~~opportunities to receive feedback from shareholders regarding our executive compensation program. Following the 2018 Annual Meeting, ~~of shareholders,~~at which our advisory say-on-pay proposal garnered the support of ~~over 98%~~approximately 82% of the shares ~~voted.~~ voted, we reached out to our top 25 shareholders (collectively representing over 61% of our then outstanding common stock) to solicit feedback regarding executive compensation and corporate governance. Our Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Chief Human Resources Officer spoke with six shareholders (collectively representing over 21% of our then outstanding common stock) who accepted our invitation to provide feedback.

In our conversations with shareholders, we generally heard support for the strategic initiatives on which we are focused and for the compensation measures tied to those initiatives and recognition of the need to retain key executives in order to execute the Company's strategy and improve the Company's performance. We also heard suggestions for changes to our executive compensation program, many of which varied significantly from shareholder to shareholder. Suggestions we heard included, but were not limited to, preference for use of performance shares instead of performance cash in the Company's long-term incentive program, suggestions regarding performance metrics, and consideration of stock option awards as powerful incentive tools to drive performance and increase the Company's stock price.

Our Compensation Committee ~~interpreted these results~~considered the vote result and the feedback we received as ~~an affirmation of~~it evaluated the compensation opportunities to be provided to our executive ~~pay program~~officers in 2019 and ~~as a result,~~beyond. The Compensation Committee's ability to implement several of the ~~Committee generally retained~~suggestions proposed by shareholders is largely dependent upon an increase in the ~~same structure~~number of shares available for issuance under our equity incentive plans. As such, we are requesting shareholder approval of an amendment to our Libbey Inc. 2016 ~~executive pay program.~~Omnibus Incentive Plan. Information regarding the proposed amendment can be found under the heading "Equity Compensation Plan Information - Proposal No. 3" starting on page 60.

Overview of Process for Setting ~~2016~~2018 Executive Pay

INITIAL COMPENSATION PACKAGE FOR MS. ZIBBEL

~~Leadership Transition.~~Ms. Zibbel joined Libbey effective April 5, 2018. In connection with ~~Ms. Streeter's termination of employment on January 11, 2016, the Company entered into a Mutual Separation Agreement and Release providing for separation payments and benefits consistent with~~ her ~~employment agreement. These separation payments and benefits are described in detail below under~~ ~~"Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control."~~

~~In connection with hiring Mr. Foley as CEO (in addition to his existing role as Chairman), effective January 12, 2016,~~hire, the Compensation Committee approved an initial base salary of ~~$825,000,~~$310,002, a target SMIP opportunity of ~~100%~~50%, and a target LTIP opportunity of ~~300%, all of which are equivalent to the~~70%. In setting Ms. Zibbel's initial base salary and target short-term and long-term incentive opportunities, we considered Ms. Zibbel's highly sought after skill-set and experience, her compensation package ~~that had been provided to Ms. Streeter. In setting Mr. Foley's compensation, the Committee considered~~at her previous employer, the significant responsibilities of the ~~CEO~~Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer position ~~Mr. Foley's deep knowledge of~~and its importance to achieving our ~~business and over 30 years of experience in the glass tableware and consumer products markets, the critical importance of the CEO in achieving the Company's strategic objectives,~~ ~~market data,~~ ~~and~~Creating Momentum strategy, the relationship of ~~his~~her compensation to that of our other executive ~~officers.~~officers, the fact that Ms. Zibbel had never before been chief human resources officer of a public company, and the results of the benchmarking study completed in October 2016. The Committee also granted Ms. Zibbel a sign-on cash bonus of $100,000 and a grant of 10,000 RSUs to induce her to join the Company and to replace the value of compensation she was forfeiting at her previous employer. If Ms. Zibbel resigns without Good Reason before April 5, 2019 (the first anniversary of her date of hire), she must repay the entire cash sign-on bonus within 30 days of her date of termination. The sign-on RSUs cliff-vest on April 5, 2021.

2019 Proxy Statement 37

Because Mr. Foley was retired at the time of his appointment as CEO and intends to retire once again when his employment with Libbey ends (regardless of when or how it ends), the Committee chose not to give Mr. Foley an employment agreement or change in control agreement. Instead, the Committee chose to provide Mr. Foley with modest separation benefits upon his eventual separation from service with the Company. Additional information regarding Mr. Foley's separation benefits is included below under~~"Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control."~~

Executive Compensation

~~Base Salary Adjustments.~~

BASE SALARY ADJUSTMENTS

The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries at least annually. With respect to base salary increases that were implemented in April ~~2016,~~2018, the Compensation Committee made its decisions after receiving input from Mr. Foley and Exequity. Taking into account the Company's performance in 2015, Mr. Foley recommended, and the Compensation Committee approved, minimal salary increases of 2.0%, except that Mr. Foley's base salary remained unchanged in light of his limited time in the CEO role. Subsequently, the Committee approved an additional 7.8% increase

APPROVAL OF 2018 SMIP AND 2018 LTIP DESIGNS



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

~~to Ms. Cerioli's base salary effective June 1, 2016 because of her significant contributions to the Company's global supply chain initiatives during the first five months of the year.~~

~~Approval of 2016 SMIP and 2016 LTIP Designs.~~The Compensation Committee approved the Company's ~~2016~~2018 SMIP and ~~the performance component of the Company's 2016~~2018 LTIP in ~~February 2016. The material terms~~the first quarter of the performance goals under these plans were approved by shareholders at the 2010 Annual Meeting of shareholders and reapproved by shareholders at the 2015 Annual Meeting of shareholders. The SMIP and the performance cash component of the 20162018.

EQUITY GRANTS UNDER OUR LTIP are intended to serve as "umbrella" plans and potential funding vehicles for cash bonuses to ensure full tax deductibility of cash bonuses paid to officers who are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Performance under the approved formulas determines the amounts of the bonus pools under the 2016 SMIP and performance cash component of the 2016 LTIP, respectively, and the allocations of the bonus pools set by the Compensation Committee determine the maximum amount of awards to individual participants under the plans. The bonus pool for the 2016 SMIP was established by the Committee at 4% of actual 2016 adjusted EBITDA (excluding special charges, after adjustments for any acquisitions or dispositions, and assuming budgeted exchange rates). The bonus pool under the performance cash component of the 2016 LTIP was established by the Committee at 1% of actual, cumulative adjusted EBITDA (excluding special charges, after adjustments for any acquisitions or dispositions, and assuming budgeted exchange rates) for the performance cycle. The umbrella plans merely set the maximum bonus payout that any named executive may receive under the relevant plans, and the actual bonus paid to each named executive was determined as described under ~~"What pay did Libbey's executives receive for 2016?"~~ ~~below.~~

~~Equity Grants under our LTIP.~~The Compensation Committee typically makes awards of ~~RSUs and NQSOs~~equity to our senior leadership team under our long-term incentive compensation program each February. The Compensation Committee authorized these awards at its February ~~2016~~2018 meeting, which occurred before we announced financial results for the ~~2015~~2017 fiscal year. The number of RSUs actually awarded was a function of the average closing price of our common stock over ~~a period~~the fourth quarter of 20 consecutive trading days ending on the grant date, and the number of NQSOs granted was a function of the Black-Scholes value (calculated using the average closing price of Libbey Inc. common stock over a period of 20 consecutive trading days ending on the grant date, and capping volatility at 50%) of the NQSOs on the grant date.2017. In each case, except for awards made to Ms. Zibbel, the grant date was the first business day after we released our fiscal ~~2015~~2017 financial results. For awards of RSUs made to Ms. Zibbel, the Committee authorized these awards in March 2018 and the grant date was the first business day after we released our financial results for the first quarter of 2018.

AWARDS UNDER OUR 2018 SMIP AND 2016 LTIP

~~Awards under our 2016 SMIP and 2014 LTIP.~~In February ~~2017,~~2019, the Compensation Committee ~~with input from Mr. Foley and Exequity,~~ reviewed and certified our ~~2016~~2018 performance and made the awards under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP and the performance cash component of our ~~2014~~2016 LTIP (for the ~~2014-2016~~2016-2018 performance cycle). Details regarding the decisions made and payouts awarded are described ~~below~~above under"What pay did Libbey's executives receive for ~~2016?~~2018?"

~~Our Equity Grant Practices~~

WHAT ARE LIBBEY'S EQUITY GRANT PRACTICES?

As explained above, the Compensation Committee typically makes awards of RSUs ~~and NQSOs~~ in February to our ~~senior~~executive leadership team under our LTIP. The Compensation Committee also occasionally makes "sign-on" awards of RSUs ~~and~~or NQSOs to newly hired executives and other key employees. Typically, the number of RSUs ~~and/~~or NQSOs awarded ~~are~~is determined as described above under “"What pay did Libbey's executives receive for 2018 - Equity ~~Grants under our LTIP."~~Compensation”. Occasionally, the sign-on awards include the award of a fixed number of RSUs or NQSOs intended to make the executive whole for equity awards that the executive forfeits when leaving his or her prior ~~employment. None of our named executives received sign-on awards in 2016.~~employment, or to induce the executive to join the Company.

The Compensation Committee has delegated authority to the CEO to make limited grants of ~~NQSOs,~~ RSUs ~~and SARs~~ to senior managers and other employees who are not executive officers or direct reports to the CEO. The CEO’s authority to make these grants in 2018 was subject to the following limitations and conditions:

~~For 2016, the~~The maximum number of shares underlying RSUs ~~NQSOs and/or SARs~~ that the CEO was authorized to award to all eligible individuals was ~~150,000;~~

~~The exercise price of any NQSOs and/or SARs awarded could not be less than the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date;~~230,000;

The RSUs ~~NQSOs and/or SARs~~ awarded could vest no more rapidly than ratably on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date;

The CEO was authorized to make awards only outside "quiet periods";

RSUs awarded to individuals whose home country is China were to be cash-settled RSUs;

The CEO was required to report at least quarterly to the Compensation Committee regarding the nature and scope of awards made pursuant to this authority; and



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

The agreements pursuant to which RSUs ~~NQSOs, and/or SARs~~ were granted must be substantially in ~~substantially~~ the ~~same~~ form approved by the Committee from time to time.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES RELATED TO LIBBEY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Potential Impact of Misconduct on ~~Compensation.~~Compensation

Our SMIP and long-term incentive plans are authorized under our Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2006 Omnibus ~~Plan.~~Incentive Plan or our Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, each of which contains a “clawback” provision. The clawback provision of the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan ~~contains a ‘‘clawback’’ provision that~~ obligates the recipient of a cash or equity award to reimburse us if:

we are required, as a result of misconduct, to prepare an accounting restatement due to our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws; and

the award recipient knowingly engaged, or was grossly negligent in engaging, in the misconduct, or knowingly failed, or was grossly negligent in failing, to prevent the misconduct or is one of the individuals subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The amount to be reimbursed is the amount of any payment in settlement of an award made under the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2006 Omnibus Plan and earned or accrued during the 12-month period following the first public issuance or filing with the SEC of the financial document embodying the financial reporting requirement in question.

38Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

Awards under the Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan are subject to forfeiture and clawback under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as amended, and under any clawback policy that we may have in place at any time.

Share Ownership / Retention Guidelines.

We obligate our non-management directors and our executive officers to achieve or retain ownership of meaningful amounts of equity in Libbey. For more information, see‘‘“Stock ~~Ownership — How much Libbey stock do our directors and officers own? — Stock Ownership /~~ Ownership/Retention ~~Guidelines’’~~Guidelines” ~~below.~~on page 57.

Deductibility of Compensation

~~What pay did Libbey's executives receive for 2016?~~

~~Base Salaries~~

When the Board appointed Mr. Foley to replace Ms. Streeter in January 2016, the Compensation Committee set his pay package so that it equaled the package then being provided to Ms. Streeter. Accordingly, Mr. Foley's base salary was set at $825,000. At Mr. Foley's request, his base salary will not be increased in 2017.

In February 2016, the Compensation Committee approved minimal base salary increases of 2.0% for each of the non-CEO named executives. For the executives other than Mr. White (who left the Company on March 31, 2016), the increases were effective April 1, 2016 and were as follows:

Annualized
Salary Before
Increase

Annualized
Salary After
Increase
Named Executive    ($) ($)
S. Buck    475,000 484,500
A. Cerioli    400,002 408,002
S. Kovach 336,520 343,250
S. Miñarro    350,040 357,041

In May 2016, the Committee approved an additional increase to Ms. Cerioli's base salary in recognition of her contributions to the Company's global supply chain initiatives during the first five months of the year. This additional increase, effective June 1, 2016, set Ms. Cerioli's base annual salary at $440,004.

~~Annual Cash Incentive Award under our SMIP~~

The Compensation Committee approved our 2016 SMIP design at its February 2016 meeting. Under our 2016 SMIP, each named executive had an opportunity to earn a payout based on the Company's financial performance with respect to two equally weighted metrics: revenue growth (net sales) and adjusted cash earnings (calculated as shown in ~~Appendix B~~). By contrast, our 2015 SMIP design consisted of three metrics: revenue growth (net sales) (weighted at 33%), adjusted EBIT (weighted at 34%), and trade working capital (defined as net inventory plus net accounts receivable less accounts payable) as a percentage of net sales (weighted at 33%). The Committee believed that replacing the adjusted EBIT and trade working capital productivity measures with the adjusted cash earnings measure, in combination with the revenue growth measure, encourages profitable revenue growth and prudent management of ~~inventory, accounts payable and accounts receivable - all potential consumers of cash if not appropriately managed.~~



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

~~The targets and payout scales for the Company performance metrics were:~~

Revenue Growth (Net Sales) Adjusted Cash Earnings
Full Year
Net Sales
(dollars in thousands)
Percent of Targeted Net Sales Performance Level Payout Percentage
Full Year Cash Earnings
(dollars in thousands)
Percent of Targeted Cash Earnings Performance Level Payout Percentage
$880,000 104.9% Maximum 200% $131,076 110.0% Maximum 200%
$839,138 100.0% Target 100% $119,160 100.0% Target 100%
$800,000 95.3% Threshold 40% $95,328 80.0% Threshold 50%
< $800,000 < 95.3% Below Threshold 0% < $95,328 < 80.0%
Below
Threshold
0%

~~Because the two metrics were weighted equally, the payout percentages for each metric were averaged to determine the total payout score.~~

While the 2016 net sales target of $839.1 million was lower than the net sales target under our 2015 SMIP, the Committee believed that the 2016 net sales target was a sufficiently challenging goal that aligned with the Company's annual operating plan and strategic initiatives. When this target was established in February 2016, the Company expected sales growth in 2016 to be limited to approximately 1% in light of the slowing global economy and increasing competitive dynamics - trends that began in 2015 and that were expected to continue in 2016. Additionally, the Company viewed 2016 as a year to invest in market research, new product development and e-commerce strategic planning, all of which would position us for sustainable revenue growth in later years. For these reasons, the Committee set a net sales target representing 2% growth over actual revenue for the 2015 fiscal year. The Committee sought to further ensure the rigor of the revenue growth metric by setting a high payout threshold of 95.3% of target and limiting the amount of a threshold payout to 40%. By comparison, the 2015 SMIP design required achievement of only 94.7% of target to receive a threshold payout, and payout for achieving threshold performance was 50%.

Each of our named executives had a target opportunity under the 2016 SMIP equal to a percentage of his or her actual base salary earned in 2016. The named executives’ 2016 SMIP targets were established based on a budget approved by the Board of Directors.



~~Named Executive~~		~~Target Award as a Percentage of Full-Year Base Salary~~
~~W. Foley~~		~~100%~~
~~S. Streeter~~		~~100%~~
~~S. Buck~~		~~70%~~
~~A. Cerioli~~		~~60%~~
~~S. Kovach~~		~~50%~~
~~S. Miñarro~~		~~60%~~
~~J. White~~		~~75%~~

On February 6, 2017, the Committee met and reviewed our performance and the performance of our senior leadership team during 2016. The Committee reviewed net sales and adjusted cash earnings for 2016 relative to our targeted net sales and adjusted cash earnings, respectively, for the year. We use constant currency at budgeted exchange rates when calculating our performance under each of these performance measures so that our executives will neither benefit from, nor be harmed by, currency fluctuations, which are not a reflection of the Company's performance.

Under the 2016 SMIP, the Committee may adjust actual results to exclude the impact of extraordinary and unusual items. Examples of special items for which adjustments may be made include merger and acquisition costs, severance payable to executives under our Executive Severance Compensation Policy, hedge ineffectiveness caused by unanticipated changes in regulation, and other similar items that are either not foreseen or are foreseen but are not included in the Company's annual operating plan because the occurrence of the event is substantially uncertain at the time the annual operating plan is submitted to the Board. The Committee believes such adjustments are appropriate so that our executives' pay will not be impacted, positively or negatively, by special items that are not a reflection of our core operating performance. As explained in further detail below, and as shown in the calculations set forth on attached ~~Appendix B, the Committee adjusted net sales and cash earnings to reflect certain special items. While the adjustments to net sales resulted in a net positive impact to the~~



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

~~payout score for that metric, the adjustments to cash earnings resulted in a net negative impact to the payout score for that metric.~~

The Committee acknowledged that, in connection with collective bargaining agreement negotiations relating to our Toledo, Ohio manufacturing plant, a work stoppage had adversely impacted 2017 net sales by an estimated $7 million to $9 million and 2017 cash earnings by approximately $1.5 million. And the Committee believed that management should not be penalized for refusing to concede to labor demands that were not in the long-term best interests of the Company. Accordingly, the Committee adjusted each of net sales and cash earnings to neutralize the impact of the work stoppage. Net sales and cash earnings are calculated as set forth on attached ~~Appendix B~~.

~~In addition to adjusting for the work stoppage, the Committee believed that it was appropriate to adjust cash earnings (calculated as set forth on attached~~ ~~Appendix B~~) by other items that did not reflect our core operating performance and were not anticipated or budgeted. As a result, the Committee further adjusted cash earnings (calculated as set forth on attached ~~Appendix B) by the following items:~~

Item
Amount of Adjustment to Company-Wide
Cash Earnings
Expense in connection with executive terminations $ 3,554,000

Income related to natural gas contract hedge ineffectiveness (1,860,000 )

2010 Mexican tax assessment 1,085,000

Total $ 2,779,000

After accounting for these adjustments, revenue growth was $806.9 million or 96.2% of targeted revenue growth for the year and adjusted cash earnings was $118.7 million or 99.6% of targeted adjusted cash earnings for the year. Based on the payout scales above, the payout scores for the revenue growth and adjusted cash earnings metrics (before application of any modifier for individual performance) were:

Preliminary Financial Performance Payout Score as % of Target
Revenue Growth Adjusted Cash Earnings Total
47.5 99.0 73.25

In recognition of the decline in total shareholder return over the 2016 fiscal year, however, the Committee exercised its discretion to limit the payout percentage under the revenue growth metric to threshold (40.0%). This limitation applied to all executives (except for Ms. Streeter, whose payout had been calculated at the time of her termination in January 2016) and was based solely on the Company's decline in total shareholder return during 2016, as opposed to any individual executive's performance. The resulting payout scores (before application of any modifier for individual performance) were:

Final Financial Performance Payout Score as % of Target
Revenue Growth Adjusted Cash Earnings Total
40.0 99.0 69.5

Pursuant to the plan design for the 2016 SMIP, an executive's individual award may also be adjusted (up or down) by as much as 25%, depending on his or her individual performance, including with respect to individual objectives approved by the Compensation Committee early in 2016. As a result, an executive who demonstrated exceptional performance in developing and/or implementing a process or tool that may not have impacted the current year’s financial results but is likely to favorably impact future success may be awarded a payout greater than the payout that is based strictly on financial performance measures. Alternatively, an executive whose individual performance did not meet expectations may be awarded a payout less than the payout that is based strictly on financial performance measures. Applying the individual performance modifier also ensured that the executive’s compensation was based not only on the goals achieved, but also on the extent to which the executive demonstrated effective organizational leadership skills in executing our strategy.

Pursuant to the separation and release agreement between Ms. Streeter and the Company, her 2016 SMIP payout amount was calculated at the time of her termination assuming target company performance, with no modifier for individual performance. The Committee received input from Mr. Foley regarding the other named executives' individual performance



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

review scores, including an evaluation of the extent to which they achieved their individual objectives. After meeting in executive session with Exequity, the Committee determined that: (a) in light of the Company's performance, the payout amounts earned by each named executive should not be increased, despite any individual extraordinary performance; and (b) based on Ms. Cerioli's individual performance during the second half of 2016, Ms. Cerioli's payout should be reduced by 20%. Accordingly, the named executives received the following payouts under the 2016 SMIP:



~~Named Executive~~		~~SMIP 2016 Payout~~ ~~($)~~
~~W. Foley~~		~~556,000~~
~~S. Streeter~~		~~24,057~~
~~S. Buck~~		~~234,554~~
~~A. Cerioli~~		~~141,670~~
~~S. Kovach~~		~~118,695~~
~~S. Miñarro~~		~~148,156~~
~~J. White~~		~~68,414~~

~~Long-Term Performance-Based Compensation~~

In 2016, each named executive’s long-term incentive opportunity included a cash-based performance component and an award of NQSOs and RSUs. The long-term incentive opportunity is intended to have an aggregate economic value equal to a target percentage of the executive’s base salary. The table below sets forth the target percentage for each of the named executives in 2016.

Named Executive
2016 Target Long-Term Award
as a Percentage of Annualized
Base Salary
(%)

2016 LTIP Performance Cash
Target as Percentage of
Annualized Base Salary
(%)
W. Foley 300 120
S. Streeter 300 120
S. Buck 140 56
A. Cerioli 120 48
S. Kovach 95 38
S. Miñarro 120 48
J. White 150 60

~~The cash-based performance opportunity provided to our named executives for performance during 2016 consisted of the following components:~~

A performance component under our 2014 LTIP (for the 2014-2016 performance cycle) that provides for cash awards based on our performance, over the three-year performance cycle, against the following equally weighted performance measures: (1) a profitability measure - namely, the extent to which we achieve our targeted adjusted EBITDA margin over the performance cycle; and (2) a financial leverage measure - namely, the extent to which we achieve our targeted net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio over the performance cycle. The targeted adjusted EBITDA margin over the performance cycle was 15.3% and the targeted net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio was 2.82.

A performance component under our 2015 LTIP (for the 2015-2017 performance cycle) and 2016 LTIP (for the 2016-2018 performance cycle) that provides for cash awards if and to the extent we achieve our targeted return on invested capital (ROIC) for each of the three one-year performance periods included in the three-year performance cycle. Because of ROIC's relationship to total shareholder return, using ROIC as a performance measure emphasizes our philosophy that compensation should align with the long-term interests of our shareholders. The scale used to determine the payout score for each of the three one-year performance periods is reset for each performance period to correlate with targeted ROIC for that year. The amount of the final payout, if any, will be determined based on the average of the three discrete, single-year payout scores.



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~


◦	For any performance cycle of which 2015 is a part, our 2015 ROIC target was 12.9%. We achieved ROIC of 10.9% in 2015, resulting in a payout score for the 2015 calendar year of 0%, as determined according to the following scale:

Basis Points Above or Below 2015 Targeted ROIC
Payout
Score
(%)

+50 200
0 100
-70 50

Less than -70

0

◦

For any performance cycle of which 2016 is a part, our 2016 ROIC target was 10.8%. In setting the target, the Committee considered the Company's prior year performance and alignment with the Company's annual operating plan and long-term strategic initiatives. The slowing global economy, decline in restaurant traffic, shift in retail sales toward e-commerce, and competitive pricing environment of 2015 were expected to continue in 2016. The realities of the business environment led the Company to shift its priorities from aggressive growth toward improving marketing and new product development capabilities and innovation, improving customer relationships, and simplifying the business - all of which would support future sustainable, profitable growth. The Committee believed that a 2016 ROIC target of 10.8% would prove sufficiently challenging to achieve. In February 2017, the Committee determined that we had achieved 2016 ROIC of 9.9%, resulting in a payout score for the 2016 calendar year of 55%, as determined according to the following scale:

Basis Points Above or Below 2016 Targeted ROIC
Payout
Score
(%)

+100 200
0 100
-150 25

Less than -150

0

~~Each of our adjusted EBITDA margin, net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio and ROIC performance measures is calculated as set forth on~~ ~~Appendix A~~.

~~For purposes of determining the extent to which the cash award is earned, adjusted EBITDA is calculated as described in~~ ~~Appendix A~~. Under the LTIP, the Committee may adjust actual results to exclude the impact of extraordinary and unusual items that are not indicative of our core operating performance and were not anticipated or budgeted. For purposes of the 2014 LTIP, the Committee approved the adjustment of 2016 EBITDA by the same special items included in adjusted EBITDA as reported in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016:

Item
Amount of Adjustment to Company-Wide
EBITDA
Product portfolio optimization $ 5,693,000

Income related to natural gas contract hedge ineffectiveness (1,860,000 )

Toledo Plant work stoppage 4,162,000

Executive terminations 4,460,000

Pension settlements 168,000

Total $ 12,623,000

Additionally, the Committee adjusted 2016 net debt to neutralize the impact of our use of less cash for share repurchases than was budgeted. This adjustment resulted in a net negative impact to the payout score for the net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio performance metric.



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

The Committee approved these adjustments so that the executives would neither benefit from, nor be harmed by, the impact of items that were not indicative of our core operating performance and were not anticipated or budgeted.

In February 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed our performance for the three-year performance cycle ended December 31, 2016 and determined that we had achieved an adjusted EBITDA margin of 14.2% over the three-year performance cycle, or 92.2% of our targeted adjusted EBITDA margin of 15.3%, and a net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio of 3.22 for the three-year performance cycle, or 87.2% of our targeted net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio of 2.82. The Committee then applied the following scales, which the Committee approved in 2014, to determine the amount earned under the performance cash component of the 2014 LTIP:

Adjusted EBITDA Margin Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio
Percent of Targeted
Adjusted EBITDA Margin
Performance Level
Payout
Percentage
Percent of Targeted Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio Performance Level
Payout
Percentage
115% Maximum 200 115% Maximum 200
100% Target 100 100% Target 100
80% Threshold 50 80% Threshold 50
<80% Below Threshold 0 <80% Below Threshold 0

~~Because the performance measures were weighted equally, their payout percentages were averaged to determine the final payout score:~~

Final Payout Score as % of Target
Adjusted EBITDA Margin Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio Total
80.6% 68.2% 74.4%

~~The final payout amounts received by the named executives under the performance cash component of the 2014 LTIP were:~~



~~Named Executive~~		~~2014 LTIP Cash Payout~~ ~~($)~~
~~W. Foley~~⁽¹⁾		~~245,520~~
~~S. Streeter~~⁽²⁾		~~406,027~~
~~S. Buck~~		~~151,657~~
~~A. Cerioli~~⁽¹⁾		~~72,342~~
~~S. Kovach~~		~~90,559~~
~~S. Miñarro~~		~~92,950~~
~~J. White~~⁽¹⁾		~~58,590~~


~~(1)~~	~~Prorated to reflect the portion of the performance cycle during which the named executive was employed.~~


~~(2)~~	Ms. Streeter's payout amount was calculated at the time of her termination based on the most recent forecasts available. The payout amount was then prorated to reflect the portion of the performance cycle during which she was employed. This final payout amount was paid to her in March 2016.

~~Stock Options and RSUs~~

In February 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded to participants in our 2016 LTIP (other than Ms. Streeter) NQSOs and RSUs having an economic value at the time of award equal to 20% and 40%, respectively, of their target long-term incentive opportunities. These NQSOs and RSUs vest ratably over four years beginning on February 17, 2017.



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

~~What is the Compensation Committee’s policy regarding deductibility of compensation?~~

~~Pursuant to~~ Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code ~~publicly-held corporations are prohibited~~precludes the Company from ~~deducting~~taking a federal income tax deduction for compensation paid ~~to certain executive officers, as of the end of the fiscal year,~~ in excess of ~~$1.0~~$1 million ~~unless~~to our covered employees (which includes the CEO and our three other most highly compensated executive officers, other than the Chief Financial Officer, for years prior to 2018). Prior to 2018 (and including tax years that began prior to January 1, 2018), this limitation did not apply to performance-based compensation. While the Compensation Committee has generally attempted to maximize the tax deductibility of executive compensation, ~~is ‘‘performance-based.’’ The~~the Compensation Committee believes that ~~preserving~~ the ~~tax deductibility~~primary purpose of our compensation program is ~~an important, but~~to support the Company’s business strategy and the long-term interests of our shareholders. Therefore, the Compensation Committee has maintained the flexibility to award compensation that may not be tax-deductible if doing so furthers the ~~sole, objective when designing~~objectives of our executive compensation ~~programs. Accordingly, while our 2016 SMIP~~program.

Under the recent U.S. tax reform, the exception to Section 162(m) for performance-based compensation has been repealed for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, subject to certain transition and grandfathering rules. In addition, the ~~performance cash components~~Chief Financial Officer is now included as a covered employee. Despite these new limits on the deductibility of performance-based compensation, the Compensation Committee continues to believe that a significant portion of our ~~2014 LTIP, 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP (for~~named executive officers’ compensation should be tied to the ~~2014-2016 performance cycle,~~Company’s performance. Therefore, it is not currently anticipated that the ~~2015-2017 performance cycle and~~changes to Section 162(m) will significantly impact the ~~2016-2018 performance cycle, respectively) are designed to qualify as “performance-based” compensation, other components~~design of our ~~2016 executive pay~~compensation program (base salary and RSUs) are not. Additionally, in certain circumstances the Committee may authorize compensation arrangements that are not tax deductible in whole or in part, but which promote other important objectives such as attracting and retaining key executive leaders who can drive financial and strategic objectives that maximize long-term shareholder value.going forward.

~~Does Libbey assess compensation-related risks?~~Compensation Risk Assessment

On an annual basis, management conducts a risk assessment of our compensation policies, practices and plans to determine whether they encourage excessive risk-taking. In addition to reviewing this annual risk-assessment, the Compensation Committee also reviews and discusses, at least annually, the relationship between risk management policies and practices and compensation and evaluates compensation policies and practices that could mitigate any such risk. Examples of features of our compensation program that guard against excessive risk-taking include:

An appropriate mix of fixed and variable, short-term and long-term, and cash and equity compensation;

Compensation Committee discretion regarding individual executive awards;

Oversight by non-participants in the plans;

Long-term compensation awards and vesting periods that encourage a focus on sustained, long-term results;

Executive incentive awards are subject to forfeiture and clawback;

Prohibition against hedging, pledging and engaging in transactions involving derivatives of our stock;

Stock ~~ownership /~~ ownership/retention requirements for our executives; and

"Double-trigger" vesting of equity awards and non-equity incentives after a change in control.

The Compensation Committee has determined that our compensation policies, practices and plans do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking, and that the level of risk that they do encourage is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

~~Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control~~

~~Ms. Streeter~~

~~We had an employment agreement with Ms. Streeter, whose employment was terminated effective January 11, 2016. Ms. Streeter's termination of employment was treated as a termination without Cause~~⁽¹⁾ under her employment agreement, which provided for certain separation payments and benefits in the event of such a termination. In establishing those payments and benefits, the Compensation Committee intended to support the objectives of attracting and retaining a talented chief executive officer by providing benefits consistent with competitive market practice, compensating Ms. Streeter for service to us and bridging the gap between employment with us and her next job, and compensating Ms. Streeter in exchange for restrictive covenants that protect Libbey's future interests.

In connection with her termination, we entered into a Mutual Separation Agreement and Release with Ms. Streeter. The separation payments and benefits we provided to Ms. Streeter under that agreement are consistent with the separation payments and benefits provided for in her employment agreement, except with respect to the timing and calculation method of incentive award payments under the 2016 SMIP and the performance cash components of the 2014 LTIP, 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP. The employment agreement called for payment of the amounts actually earned, prorated to the date of termination, with payments to be made between January 1 and March 15 of the year following the end of each applicable performance cycle. In the interest of fully and quickly resolving all potential issues related to separation compensation, the Company and Ms. Streeter mutually agreed to estimate the amounts that would be earned based on the most recent forecasts available in January 2016, prorate those estimated amounts to the date of termination, and make the payments to Ms. Streeter in March 2016. Accordingly, Ms. Streeter received the following benefits in connection with her termination:

~~Accrued Benefits.~~

Cash severance equal to two times the sum of (a) her annual base salary in effect on the date of termination; and (b) her target 2016 SMIP opportunity, with such amount being payable in equal monthly installments over a period of 24 months.

~~Annual incentive award under our 2016 SMIP based on Ms. Streeter's base salary earnings for 2016 and forecasted Company performance as of the end of January 2016.~~

Performance-based cash compensation under our 2014 LTIP, 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP, based on forecasted Company performance as of the end of January 2016, and prorated to Ms. Streeter's termination date.

~~Accelerated vesting of all cash-settled retention RSUs and cash-settled retention SARs.~~

~~Accelerated vesting of all other unvested equity awards that were scheduled to vest on or before June 30, 2016.~~

~~Executive-level outplacement services selected by Ms. Streeter, with the aggregate cost to Libbey not to exceed $75,000.~~

~~Continuation of medical, prescription drug, dental and life insurance benefits for a period of 18 months, with Ms. Streeter continuing to pay employee contributions.~~

~~Ms. Streeter's obligations under the Mutual Separation Agreement and Release include:~~

~~Our receipt of a release of claims against Libbey;~~

~~Confidentiality obligations;~~

~~Obligation to assign intellectual property rights;~~

~~Obligation to assist with litigation as to which Ms. Streeter has knowledge; and~~

~~24-month obligation not to: (a) interfere with customer accounts; (b) compete; (c) divert business opportunities; (d) solicit our employees; nor (e) disparage us.~~

~~(1)~~

Cause means (a) willful and continuous failure to substantially perform duties; (b) willful and continuous failure to substantially follow and comply with directives of the Board; (c) commission of an act of fraud or dishonesty that results in a material adverse effect on us or commission of an act in material violation of our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct; or (d) willful, illegal conduct or gross misconduct that is materially and demonstrably injurious to us.



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Mr. Foley

Mr. Foley is employed at will. He is not covered by an employment agreement or change in control agreement, nor is he eligible to participate in our Executive Severance ~~Pay Plan,~~Compensation Policy, our Salary Plan, or our SERP.

In early 2016, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Foley that provides for, among other things, limited separation benefits under certain circumstances. As with all other named executives, the award agreements relating to grants of RSUs, NQSOs and performance cash opportunities also provide for separation benefits in certain circumstances. There are no conditions to ~~Libbey's~~Libbey’s obligations to provide separation benefits to Mr. Foley.

Because Mr. Foley was retired at the time of his ~~appointment as CEO~~hire and intends to retire once again when his employment with Libbey ends (regardless of when or how it ends), the Compensation Committee chose to provide Mr. Foley with more modest separation benefits compared to those of our other named executives.

2019 Proxy Statement 39

Executive Compensation

With respect to Mr. Foley, the following table summarizes the trigger events under which payments may be made and/or other benefits provided, and the material payments or benefits to be provided, assuming Mr. Foley's employment ended December 31, 2018. Effective March 24, 2019, Mr. Foley retired from his role as CEO but continues to be employed by the Company as Executive Chairman. If Mr. Foley's employment ~~terminates, other than a termination~~ends in the future, he will be eligible for ~~Cause, Mr. Foley would be entitled to~~ the ~~following Basic Benefits:~~

~~Accrued Benefits;~~same benefits and

~~For~~ payments as described below, except that his participation in the ~~year in which termination occurs, a prorated award under our SMIP based on actual performance.~~

~~If the termination is due to Mr. Foley's death or permanent disability, Mr. Foley would be entitled to the Basic Benefits plus:~~

A prorated target award under the performance cash component of the LTIP for any performance cycle in effect on the date of death or permanent disability, paid as soon as administratively feasible; and

~~Immediate vesting of all NQSOs and RSUs.~~

~~If the termination is by Libbey without Cause, Mr. Foley would be entitled to the Basic Benefits plus:~~

As to performance-based cash compensation under our LTIP, payment of the amount actually earned for each performance cycle in effect on the date of termination, prorated to the termination date; provided, however, that the amounts will not be prorated if the termination is in connection with a change in control; and

Immediate vesting of all NQSOs and RSUs scheduled to vest within one year of the termination date; provided, however, that all unvested NQSOs and RSUs will vest if the termination is in connection with a change in control.

~~If the termination is due to Mr. Foley's resignation, Mr. Foley would be entitled to the Basic Benefits plus:~~

~~As to performance-based cash compensation under our LTIP, payment of the amount actually earned for each performance cycle in effect on the date of termination, prorated to the termination date.~~

~~Except as in instances of death or permanent disability, amounts paid under our~~2019 SMIP and the performance cash components of the 2017 LTIP (2017-2019 performance cycle), 2018 LTIP (2018-2020 performance cycle) and 2019 LTIP (2019-2021 performance cycle) will be prorated to March 31, 2019.



	Death or Disability	Resignation or Retirement	Termination without Cause	Termination without Cause in connection with Change in Control
Cash Severance	None	None	None	None
Annual Cash Incentive (SMIP)⁽¹⁾	Prorated and subject to actual performance	Prorated and subject to actual performance	Prorated and subject to actual performance	Prorated and subject to actual performance
Long-Term Performance Cash Incentive⁽¹⁾	Prorated target award for any current performance cycle, paid as soon as administratively feasible	Prorated and subject to actual performance	Prorated and subject to actual performance	Not prorated but subject to actual performance
Equity Awards Granted in 2016	All awards immediately vest	All awards immediately vest	All awards immediately vest	All awards immediately vest
Equity Awards Granted in 2017 and 2018	All awards immediately vest	Forfeit all unvested awards	Awards scheduled to vest within one year of termination date will immediately vest	All awards immediately vest
Health, Welfare and Other Benefits	Accrued Benefits only	Accrued Benefits only	Accrued Benefits only	Accrued Benefits only


(1)	Except in the case of death or permanent disability, amounts paid under our SMIP and the performance cash component of our LTIP will be paid between January 1 and March 15 of the year following the end of the relevant performance cycle.

Mr. Bauer

Mr. Bauer is not a party to an employment agreement, but is a party to a change in control agreement and is covered by our Executive Severance Compensation Policy. The terms of award agreements under which awards of RSUs and NQSOs were made to Mr. Bauer provide for acceleration of unvested awards in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances. Additionally, the terms of award agreements relating to the performance cash components of our long-term incentive plans provide for payouts in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances.

With respect to Mr. Bauer, the trigger events under which payments may be made and/or other benefits provided, the material payments or benefits to be provided, and the conditions to our obligations to make the payments and/or provide the benefits are consistent with those summarized in the table below regarding our non-CEO named executives, with the following exceptions:

If Mr. ~~Foley had retired on~~Bauer's employment is terminated without Cause, Mr. Bauer's cash severance would consist of 24 months' salary continuation plus a lump sum equal to two times his target annual incentive;

If Mr. Bauer's employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or ~~before December 31, 2016, all unvested equity awards~~by him with Good Reason in connection with a Change in Control, Mr. Bauer's lump sum cash severance payment would ~~have been forfeited.~~be in an amount equal to three times the sum of his annual base salary in effect at the time of termination and his target annual incentive under the SMIP, and the continuation of his medical, prescription drug, dental and life insurance benefits would be for a period of 24 months.

All Other Named Executives

We do not have employment agreements with our non-CEO named executives. Our non-CEO named executives are, however:

parties to change in control agreements ~~the forms of which are substantially similar to each other,~~ that provide for payments under the circumstances described below in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a Change in Control; and

covered by our Executive Severance Compensation Policy, which provides for certain separation benefits in the event of termination of employment without Cause absent a Change in Control.



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

From the time of their hire through the end of 2018, Mr. Mossing and Ms. Zibbel were eligible for more limited severance benefits than those provided under our Executive Severance Compensation Policy. However, Mr. Mossing and Ms. Zibbel have since become eligible for full benefits under the Executive Severance Compensation Policy. In addition, the sign-on bonus provided to Ms. Zibbel is subject to full repayment if she resigns without Good Reason before April 5, 2019, and the sign-on bonus provided to Mr. Mossing in 2017 is subject to full repayment if he voluntarily resigns before December 4, 2019.

The terms of award agreements under which awards of RSUs and NQSOs were made provide for acceleration of unvested awards in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances. Additionally, the terms of award agreements relating to the performance cash components of our ~~2014 LTIP (for the 2014-2016 performance cycle), 2015 LTIP (for the 2015-2017 performance cycle) and~~ 2016 LTIP (for the 2016-2018 performance cycle), 2017 LTIP (for the 2017-2019 performance cycle) and 2018 LTIP (for the 2018-2020 performance cycle) provide for payouts in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances.

40Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

Mr. ~~White's~~Miñarro’s employment ended ~~March 31, 2016.~~January 15, 2018. His termination was ~~treated as a termination by Libbey~~ without Cause under the Executive Severance Compensation Policy, and he received severance benefits and payments pursuant to the terms of the Executive Severance Compensation Policy and equity and performance cash agreements. Such severance benefits and payments are consistent with those described below under ~~"Termination~~“Termination without Cause, ~~(No Change~~” with the following exception: The Committee elected to accelerate the vesting of 3,000 unvested RSUs that were awarded to Mr. Miñarro in ~~Control)"~~2015 to replace the value of certain pension and insocial security benefits that Mr. Miñarro forfeited when he was promoted to Vice President, General Manager, U.S. and Canada, from his previous position with Libbey's Mexican subsidiary. Had the ~~Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment~~ ~~table on page 48.~~

~~Ms. Buck voluntarily resigned without Good Reason effective December 31, 2016. Ms. Buck was~~Committee not ~~entitled~~exercised its discretion to ~~any separation benefits or payments in connection with her resignation.~~accelerate vesting, the 3,000 RSUs would have been forfeited upon Mr. Miñarro's termination.

Because individuals hired after January 1, 2006, are ineligible for participation in the Salary Plan and SERP, Ms. Kovach is our only named executive who is eligible for benefits under the Salary Plan and SERP. As of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, Ms. Kovach was at least age 55 and had at least five years of service with Libbey. As a result, Ms. Kovach would have been eligible to receive a retirement benefit under our Salary Plan and SERP if she had retired on or before December 31, ~~2016.~~2018. If Ms. Kovach or any of our other non-CEO named executives had retired on or before December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, all unvested equity awards would have been forfeited.

With respect to all non-CEO named executives, the following table assumes a termination date of December 31, 2018, and summarizes the trigger events under which payments may be made and/or other benefits provided, the material payments or benefits to be provided, and the conditions to our obligations to make the payments and/or provide the ~~benefits, and the reasons why we believe that providing these payments and/or benefits is appropriate under the circumstances described.~~benefits.

~~Event~~

~~Benefits~~

~~Conditions to Payment of Benefits~~

~~Rationale~~

Death or
Disability

Termination
for Cause or
Quit without
Good Reason

Quit for
Good Reason

Termination
without Cause

Termination without Cause
or Quit for Good Reason
in connection with
Change in Control

All
Non-CEO NEOs

~~Death or Permanent Disability~~All
Non-CEO NEOs

•

Mr. Mossing and Ms. Zibbel⁽¹⁾

~~Accrued Benefits~~All other
Non-CEO NEOs

All
Non-CEO NEOs

Cash
Severance

None

•

~~To compensate for service to us~~

•

~~A prorated target award under the LTIP performance cash component for any performance cycle in effect on the date of death or permanent disability~~

•

~~Aids in attracting and retaining executives~~

•

~~Accelerated vesting of all unvested RSUs and NQSOs~~

•

~~Consistent with competitive market practice~~

~~Quit for Good Reason~~

~~(No Change in Control)~~

•

~~Accrued Benefits~~

None

•6 months' salary continuation + (for Mr. Mossing only) lump sum of 50% target annual incentive

~~To compensate for service to us~~12 months’ salary continuation + lump sum target annual incentive

Lump sum 2x annual salary + 2x target annual incentive⁽³⁾

Annual
Cash Incentive
(SMIP)

•

None

AsProrated and subject to ~~performance-based compensation under our LTIP, payment of the amount actually earned for each~~actual performance ~~cycle in effect on the date of termination, prorated to the date of termination~~⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

Prorated and subject to actual performance⁽²⁾

Long-Term
Performance
Cash Incentive

Prorated target award for any current performance cycle

None

•

~~Aids in attracting~~

Prorated and ~~retaining executives~~

subject to actual performance⁽²⁾

Prorated and subject to actual performance⁽²⁾

Not prorated but subject to actual performance⁽²⁾

Equity Awards

•

~~Consistent with competitive market practice~~



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~



~~Event~~All awards immediately vest	Forfeit all unvested awards		Forfeit all unvested awards		Awards scheduled to vest within 1 year immediately vest		All awards immediately vest
Health, Welfare and Other Benefits	~~Conditions~~Accrued Benefits only		Accrued Benefits only		Accrued Benefits only	Accrued Benefits; continued dental/health benefits during period of salary continuation; outplacement services during period of salary continuation			Accrued Benefits; 18 months continued dental/health/life insurance benefits; outplacement services with cost to Libbey ≤15% base salary; financial planning services with cost to Libbey ≤$10,000
Conditions to Payment of Benefits		~~Rationale~~
None	None		None
~~Termination without Cause (No Change in Control)~~	•	~~Accrued Benefits~~		•	Release of claims against ~~Libbey~~		•	~~To compensate for service to us and bridge the gap between employment with us and the executive's next job~~
	•	~~For the year in which termination occurs, a prorated SMIP award based on actual performance~~⁽¹⁾
				•	Libbey; Confidentiality ~~obligations~~
				•	Libbey; Confidentiality ~~obligations~~
	•	~~Base salary continuation for 12 months~~		•	obligations; Obligation to assign intellectual property ~~rights~~
	•	~~Lump sum payment equal to the executive's SMIP target award. Paid on the first payroll date after termination~~		•
				•	rights; Obligation to assist with ~~litigation as to which the executive has knowledge~~	•	~~Aids in attracting and retaining executives~~
	•	~~As to LTIP performance-based cash compensation, payment of the amount actually earned for each performance cycle in effect on termination date, prorated to termination date~~⁽¹⁾		•			~~Aids in attracting and retaining executives~~
						•	~~To provide compensation in exchange for restrictive covenants that protect Libbey's future interests~~
	•	~~Immediate vesting of all NQSOs and RSUs scheduled to vest within one~~litigation; 1 year ~~of termination~~		•	~~12-month~~ obligation not to interfere with customer accounts, compete, divert business opportunities, solicit our employees, or disparage us
	•			•
	•	~~Continuation of medical, dental, prescription drug and life insurance coverage for 12 months, subject to payment by the executive of premiums at employee rates~~
						•	~~Consistent with competitive market practice~~
	•	~~For a period of one year from termination, executive level outplacement services at the rate for Shields Meneley Partners or equivalent~~				•	~~Consistent with competitive market practice~~


~~Termination without Cause or~~ ~~Quit for~~ ~~Good Reason~~ ~~in connection with a~~ ~~Change in Control~~	•	~~Accrued Benefits~~		•	Release of claims against ~~Libbey~~	•	~~Aids in attracting and retaining executives~~
	•	~~For the year in which termination occurs, a prorated SMIP award based on actual performance~~⁽¹⁾			Release of claims against ~~Libbey~~
	•			•	Libbey; Confidentiality ~~obligations~~
					Libbey; Confidentiality ~~obligations~~	•	~~To provide compensation in exchange for restrictive covenants that protect Libbey’s future interests~~
	•	~~As to LTIP performance cash compensation under, payment of the amount actually earned for each performance cycle in effect on the date of termination~~⁽¹⁾		•	obligations; Obligation to assign intellectual property ~~rights~~
				•	rights; Obligation to assist with ~~litigation as to which the executive has knowledge~~
	•	~~Accelerated vesting of all unvested equity awards~~		•
	•	~~Accelerated vesting of all unvested equity awards~~				•	~~Consistent with competitive market practice~~
	•	~~Lump-sum payment of two times the sum of the executive’s annual base salary in effect on the date notice of termination is given plus the executive’s target SMIP opportunity for the~~litigation; 1 year ~~in which the notice of termination is given~~⁽²⁾				•
				•	~~12-month~~ obligation not to interfere with customer accounts, compete, divert business opportunities, solicit our employees, or disparage us
	•	~~Executive level outplacement services by a provider approved by Libbey, with the cost being limited to 15% of the executive’s base salary at the time of termination~~
	•	~~Financial planning services, with the cost to Libbey not to exceed $10,000~~
	•	Continuation of medical, prescription drug, dental and life insurance benefits for a period of 18 months or until the executive obtains medical or life insurance through a future employer, with the executive continuing to pay the employee’s portion of the cost of such insurance



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~


(1)	The above table assumes a termination date of December 31, 2018. Mr. Mossing and Ms. Zibbel have since become eligible for the same termination benefits as the other non-CEO named executives.


(2)	Amounts paid under our SMIP and the performance cash component of our LTIP will be paid between January 1 and March 15 of the year following the end of the relevant performance cycle.


~~(2)~~(3)	Lump-sum cash payments will be paid no later than five days after termination ~~of employment~~ except to the extent the payments are subject to a six-month delay under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, in which case payment will be on the first day of the seventh month after the ~~executive's termination of employment.~~executive’s termination.

~~Definitions~~

2019 Proxy Statement 41

Executive Compensation

DEFINITIONS

Unless otherwise specified above, the following definitions apply:

"“Accrued Benefits"” includes base salary through date of termination, any amounts to which the executive is entitled under any retirement savings plan, equity participation plan, medical benefit plan or employment policy and any incentive compensation earned but not yet paid for a performance period ended before the date of termination.

"“Cause"” means (a) willful and continuous failure to substantially perform duties; (b) willful and continuous failure to substantially follow and comply with directives of the Board; (c) commission of an act of fraud or dishonesty that results in harm to us or failure to comply with a material policy, including our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct; (d) material breach of a material obligation to us; or (e) commission of illegal conduct or gross misconduct that causes harm to us. When used in reference to a termination that is not in connection with a change in control, ~~"Cause"~~“Cause” can have any of the previously listed meanings or: conviction of a misdemeanor or felony that is directly related to, or indicates the executive is not suited for, the position the executive occupies with us.

"“Change in Control"” generally means any of the following events:

A person (other than Libbey, any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under one of our employee benefit plans, or any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by our shareholders in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of our common stock) becomes the ~~‘‘beneficial~~“beneficial owner,’’” directly or indirectly, of our securities representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of our then-outstanding securities;

The consummation of a merger or consolidation pursuant to which we are merged or consolidated with any other corporation (or other entity), unless our voting securities outstanding immediately prior to the merger or consolidation continue to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than 66 2/3% of the combined voting power of securities of the surviving entity outstanding immediately after the merger or consolidation;

A plan of complete liquidation or an agreement for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets is consummated; or

During any period of two consecutive years (not including any period prior to the execution of the agreement), Continuing Directors (as defined below) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of our Board. Continuing Directors means (i) individuals who were members of the Board at the beginning of the two-year period referred to above and (ii) any individuals elected to the Board, after the beginning of the two-year period referred to above, by a vote of at least 2/3 of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously approved in accordance with this provision. However, an individual who is elected to the Board after the beginning of the two-year period referred to above will not be considered to be a Continuing Director if the individual was designated by a person who has entered into an agreement with us to effect a transaction that otherwise meets the definition of a change in control.

A person typically is considered to be the ~~‘‘beneficial owner’’~~“beneficial owner” of securities if the person has or shares the voting power associated with those securities.

"“Good Reason"” means (a) the executive ceases to be an officer of the Company; (b) we reduce the executive’s base salary and we do not apply the reduction in the same or similar manner to similarly situated employees; (c) we materially reduce the executive’s annual incentive compensation opportunity and the reduction is not applied in the same or similar manner to similarly situated employees; (d) we materially reduce or eliminate an executive benefit or an employee benefit, and we do not apply the reduction to similarly situated employees in the same or similar manner; (e) we materially breach any written agreement between the executive and the Company and we fail to remedy the breach within 60 days after our receipt from the executive of written notice of breach; or (f) we exercise our right not to renew the agreement unless we concurrently exercise our right not to renew the agreements of similarly situated employees.



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

~~Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation~~

Carlos V. Duno, Ginger M. Jones, Theo Killion, Eileen A. Mallesch and Carol B. Moerdyk served on our Compensation Committee during 2016. None of Mr. Duno, Ms. Jones, Mr. Killion, Ms. Mallesch or Ms. Moerdyk has been an officer or employee of Libbey or its subsidiaries.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with Libbey’s management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this proxy statement. Taking all of these reviews and discussions into account, the Compensation Committee has approved the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this proxy statement and has approved the incorporation by reference of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2018.



	Carlos V. Duno, Chair
	Ginger M. Jones
	~~Theo Killion~~
	Eileen A. Mallesch
	Carol B. Moerdyk Steve Nave

42Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~	Executive Compensation Tables

~~Summary Compensation Table~~

The following narrative and tables describe the ‘‘total compensation’’ our named executives earned during 2016, 2015 and 2014. The total compensation presented below does not reflect the actual pay received by, or the target pay of, the named executives in 2016, 2015 or 2014. The actual value realized by our named executives in 2016 from NQSOs and RSUs is presented in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table on page 44. Target annual and long-term incentive awards for 2016 are presented in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 40.

The core components of our named executives' compensation are base salary, an annual cash incentive opportunity pursuant to our SMIP, and a long-term incentive opportunity under our LTIP, which includes performance-based cash compensation and equity awards. In addition to these core components, our executives occasionally receive compensation through sign-on awards, discretionary awards in recognition of outstanding individual contributions, retention awards, or in connection with termination of employment. In 2016, Ms. Streeter and Mr. White received compensation in connection with their terminations of employment. Ms. Buck did not receive any compensation in connection with her resignation.

~~Ms. Streeter~~

~~CEO Retention Award.~~ As indicated in our proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting, we entered into a CEO Retention Award Agreement with Ms. Streeter in December 2013 pursuant to which the Company issued to Ms. Streeter 240,829 cash-settled stock appreciation rights (which we refer to as SARs) in December 2013 and 115,687 restricted stock units (which we refer to as RSUs) in February 2014. These awards were subject to cliff vesting on December 31, 2018. When Ms. Streeter's employment terminated on January 11, 2016, these awards automatically vested under the terms of the agreement. The value of these RSUs and SARs is not included in the "All Other Compensation" column in this Summary Compensation Table because the cumulative grant date fair values were included in the "Stock Awards" and "Option Awards" columns of the Summary Compensation Tables in the years in which they were granted.

At the time the Compensation Committee and other non-management directors approved the CEO Retention Award Agreement, and the awards of SARs and RSUs made under it, the Compensation Committee and other non-management directors believed that the awards were in the best interest of our shareholders. The Committee and the Board believed that it was critical to the Company's transformation from a manufacturing-focused company to a consumer-focused company to ensure that Ms. Streeter's talents continued to be available to steer the transformation. Recognizing that Ms. Streeter's skills and talents may be in high demand from others, and in order to maximize the retention value at the time of the awards, the Committee elected to provide Ms. Streeter with cash-settled retention RSUs and cash-settled SARs, the vesting of which would be accelerated if the company were to elect to terminate her employment without cause before December 31, 2018, when the awards were otherwise scheduled to cliff-vest. The Committee and the Board viewed the CEO Retention Award Agreement, and the grants of SARs and RSUs made under it, as extraordinary in nature, and did not enter into any additional special retention agreements with Ms. Streeter or Mr. Foley, nor do they anticipate entering into any similar agreements with Mr. Foley or any of the other executive officers.

~~Separation Agreement.~~ We entered into a Mutual Separation Agreement and Release with Ms. Streeter in January 2016 in connection with her termination. The separation payments and benefits we provided to Ms. Streeter under that agreement are consistent with the separation payments and benefits provided for in her employment agreement, except with respect to the timing and calculation method of incentive award payments under the 2016 SMIP and the performance cash components of the 2014 LTIP, 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP. The employment agreement called for payment of the amounts actually earned, prorated to the date of termination, with payments to be made between January 1 and March 15 of the year following the end of each applicable performance cycle. In the interest of fully and quickly resolving all potential issues related to separation compensation, the Company and Ms. Streeter mutually agreed to estimate the amounts that would be earned based on the most recent forecasts available in January 2016, prorate those estimated amounts to the date of termination, and make the payments to Ms. Streeter in March 2016. Our expense associated with these payments is reflected in the "Non-Equity Incentive Compensation" column in this Summary Compensation Table.

~~Mr. White~~

The payments and benefits provided to Mr. White in connection with his termination were determined in accordance with the Executive Severance Compensation Policy and the award agreements governing awards of RSUs, NQSOs and LTIP performance cash opportunities. The values of those RSUs and NQSOs for which vesting accelerated in connection with Mr. White's termination are not included in the "All Other Compensation" column in this Summary Compensation Table because the cumulative grant date fair values were included in the "Stock Awards" and "Option Awards" columns of the Summary Compensation Tables in the years in which they were granted.



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

For additional information regarding the payments and benefits provided to Ms. Streeter and Mr. White in connection with their terminations of employment, and additional information regarding the agreements, plans and policies pursuant to which those payments and benefits were provided, see ~~"Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control"~~ ~~above and the~~ ~~Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment Table~~ ~~on page 48.~~

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following narrative and tables describe the “total compensation” our named executives earned during 2018, 2017 and 2016. The total compensation presented below does not reflect the actual pay received by, or the target pay of, the named executives in 2018, 2017 or 2016. The actual value realized by our named executives in 2018 from NQSOs and RSUs is presented in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table on page 48. Target annual and long-term incentive awards for 2018 are presented in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 45.

Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)⁽¹⁾

Bonus
($)⁽²⁾

Stock
Awards
($)⁽³⁾

Option
Awards
($)⁽⁴⁾

Non-Equity
Incentive
Compensation
($)⁽⁵⁾

Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)⁽⁶⁾

All Other
Compensation
($)⁽⁷⁾

Total
($)
William A. Foley 2016 804,185
0
1,037,687
532,688
801,520
0
110,050
3,286,130
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer⁽⁸⁾

Stephanie A. Streeter 2016 21,166
0
0
0
653,666
0
3,301,516
3,976,348
Chief Executive 2015 792,438
0
960,406
517,050
728,386
0
73,677
3,071,957
Officer⁽⁹⁾
2014 768,750
0
4,436,131
413,043
941,390
0
44,259
6,603,573

Sherry Buck 2016 482,125
0
257,312
143,125
386,211
0
47,115
1,315,888
Vice President, Chief 2015 462,500
0
245,784
132,320
221,129
0
41,651
1,103,384
Financial Officer⁽¹⁰⁾
2014 386,907
0
217,148
112,263
311,530
0
35,988
1,063,836

Annunciata Cerioli 2016 424,670
0
185,728
103,312
214,012
0
60,679
988,401
Vice President, Chief 2015 377,646
0
244,588
77,851
86,713
0
27,435
814,233
Supply Chain 2014 29,170
252,289
246,591
70,866
13,714
0
0
612,630
Officer⁽¹¹⁾

Susan A. Kovach 2016 341,568
0
123,696
68,809
209,254
21,812
34,191
799,330
Vice President, 2015 334,070
0
128,214
69,025
123,403
0
24,320
679,032
General Counsel & 2014 325,117
25,000
129,672
67,034
189,097
29,532
19,442
784,894
Secretary

Salvador Miñarro 2016 355,291
0
162,528
90,407
241,106
0
98,845
948,177
Villalobos 2015 373,902
0
617,047
93,409
143,209
0
71,138
1,298,705
Vice President,
General Manager
U.S. & Canada⁽¹²⁾

James H. White 2016 131,250
0
304,720
169,491
127,004
0
1,041,734
1,774,199
Vice President, Chief 2015 246,591
0
1,561,933
148,879
80,949
0
13,980
2,052,332
Operating Officer⁽¹³⁾

The core components of our named executives’ compensation are base salary, an annual cash incentive opportunity under our SMIP, and a long-term incentive opportunity under our LTIP, which includes performance-based cash compensation and equity awards. In addition to these core components, our executives occasionally receive compensation through sign-on awards, discretionary awards in recognition of outstanding individual contributions, retention awards, or in connection with termination of employment.

Mr. Miñarro

In 2018, Mr. Miñarro received compensation in connection with his termination of employment. These payments and benefits were determined in accordance with the Executive Severance Compensation Policy and the award agreements governing awards of RSUs, NQSOs and LTIP performance cash opportunities. The values of those RSUs and NQSOs for which vesting accelerated in connection with Mr. Miñarro's termination are not included in the "All Other Compensation" column in this Summary Compensation Table because the cumulative grant date fair values were included in the "Stock Awards" and "Option Awards" columns of the Summary Compensation Tables in the years in which they were granted and the incremental fair value of the 3,000 RSUs for which the Compensation Committee exercised discretion to accelerate vesting is included in the "Stock Awards" column in 2018. For additional information regarding the payments and benefits provided to Mr. Miñarro in connection with his termination of employment, see "Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control" above and the Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment Table on page 51.

Ms. Zibbel

In connection with her hire, Ms. Zibbel received a $100,000 cash sign-on bonus and 10,000 RSUs to induce her to join the Company and to replace the value of compensation being forfeited at her previous employer. If Ms. Zibbel resigns without Good Reason before April 5, 2019, she must repay the entire sign-on bonus within 30 days of her date of termination. "Good Reason" is defined on page 42. The sign-on RSUs cliff-vest on April 5, 2021, the third anniversary of Ms. Zibbel's start date.



	Summary Compensation Table



							Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

						Non-Equity Incentive Compensation
		Salary	Bonus	Stock Awards	Option Awards			All Other Compensation	Total
		Salary	Bonus	Stock Awards	Option Awards			All Other Compensation	Total
Name and Principal Position	Year	($)	($)⁽¹⁾	($)⁽²⁾	($)⁽³⁾	($)⁽⁴⁾	($)⁽⁵⁾	($)⁽⁶⁾	($)
William A. Foley	2018	825,000	0	814,353	0	1,014,805	0	123,984	2,778,142
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer⁽⁷⁾	2017	770,000	0	544,611	322,592	707,520	0	120,649	2,465,372
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer⁽⁷⁾	2016	804,185	0	1,037,687	532,688	801,520	0	110,050	3,286,130
James C. Burmeister	2018	386,250	0	123,389	0	247,598	0	28,362	785,599
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer⁽⁸⁾	2017	271,354	100,000	76,808	47,057	145,859	0	25,752	666,830
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer⁽⁸⁾
Susan A. Kovach	2018	361,503	0	110,512	0	204,799	0	35,959	712,773
Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary	2017	339,189	0	71,754	42,500	143,174	22,060	33,959	652,636
Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary	2016	341,568	0	123,696	68,809	209,254	21,812	34,191	799,330
Salvador Miñarro Villalobos	2018	15,100	0	21,450	0	22,541	0	641,233	700,324
Vice President, General Manager, US & Canada⁽⁹⁾	2017	348,978	0	94,283	55,844	165,014	0	77,171	741,290
Vice President, General Manager, US & Canada⁽⁹⁾	2016	355,291	0	162,528	90,407	241,106	0	98,845	948,177
William C. Mossing	2018	300,000	0	69,095	0	141,474	0	103,391	613,960
Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer⁽¹⁰⁾
Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer⁽¹⁰⁾
Sarah J. Zibbel	2018	228,626	100,000	120,170	0	107,538	0	22,304	578,638
Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer⁽¹¹⁾
Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer⁽¹¹⁾

2019 Proxy Statement 43

Executive Compensation

(1)

As to Mr. ~~Miñarro~~Burmeister for ~~2015,~~2017 and Ms. Zibbel for 2018, represents base salary paid from January 1 through March 31, 2015, as well as other fixed components of pay that our Mexican subsidiary was required under Mexican law to pay Mr. Miñarro, totaling $111,372. These amounts were paid to Mr. Miñarro in Mexican pesos, and the amount included in this column was translated to U.S. currency using the interbank exchange rate in effect at the time of payment to Mr. Miñarro. The remaining $262,530 represents the base salary paid to Mr. Miñarro after he assumed his executive officer role on April 1, 2015.a signing bonus.


(2)	As to Ms. Cerioli for 2014, represents: (a) $70,000 signing bonus; and (b) $182,289 minimum guaranteed incentive under the 2014 SMIP. The balance of Ms. Cerioli's 2014 SMIP award is included in the "Non-Equity Incentive Compensation" column. As to Ms. Kovach for 2014, represents a special award made in April 2014 in recognition of leadership related to our 2014 refinancing.

~~(3)~~

Represents the grant date fair value, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, with respect to RSUs granted in ~~2016, 2015~~2018, 2017 and ~~2014,~~2016, respectively. As to Mr. Foley in 2016, also represents the grant date fair value, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of awards of stock made to non-management directors on May 10, 2016. On that date, we awarded certain non-management directors stock having a grant date fair value of $80,007, or $17.58 per share. Although Mr. Foley ceased to be a non-management director when he was appointed CEO on January 12, 2016, this stock award was attributable to service as a non-management director during the 2015 fiscal year. As to ~~all~~ RSU awards in ~~2016, 2015~~2018, 2017 and ~~2014 other than the special retention awards of 115,687 cash-settled RSUs made to Ms. Streeter in February 2014,~~2016, the awards vest ratably over a four-year period from the date of ~~grant. The special retention award of 115,687 cash-settled~~grant, with the following exceptions: RSUs ~~made~~granted to ~~Ms. Streeter~~Mr. Burmeister in ~~February 2014 were scheduled to cliff vest on December 31,~~



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

2018, however, all 115,687 cash-settled RSUs vested automatically upon Ms. Streeter's termination of employment on January 11, 2016. When Ms. Buck resigned effective December 31, 2016, all unvested RSUs were forfeited. When Mr. White's employment ended on March 31, 2016, vesting was accelerated with respect to all RSUs that otherwise would have vested by March 31, 2017 and all other unvested RSUs were forfeited. For more information, see Footnote 12, ‘‘Employee Stock Benefit Plans,’’ to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 3, 2017. The actual values realized by the respective named executives depend on the number of RSUs that actually vest and the price of our common stock when the RSUs vest or, in the case of Ms. Streeter's cash-settled RSUs, when they are settled in cash.

~~(4)~~

~~Represents the grant date fair value, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, with respect to NQSOs granted in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The awards~~ vest ratably over ~~a four-year period~~four years from the ~~date~~first day of ~~grant. When~~employment; 14,000 RSUs granted to Ms. ~~Buck resigned effective December 31, 2016, all unvested NQSOs were forfeited. When~~Zibbel vest ratably over four years from the first day of employment; and 10,000 RSUs granted to Ms. Zibbel cliff-vest on the third anniversary of her first day of employment. For Mr. ~~White's employment ended on March 31, 2016,~~Miñarro in 2018, also includes the incremental fair value of 3,000 RSUs for which the Compensation Committee exercised discretion to accelerate vesting ~~was accelerated~~in connection with ~~respect to all NQSOs that otherwise would have vested by March 31, 2017, and all other unvested NQSOs were forfeited.~~his termination of employment. For more information, see Footnote ~~12, ‘‘Employee~~11, “Employee Stock Benefit Plans,” to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on ~~March 3, 2017.~~February 27, 2019. The actual values realized by the respective named executives depend on the number of RSUs that actually vest and the price of our common stock when the RSUs vest.

(3)

Represents the grant date fair value, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, with respect to NQSOs granted in 2017 and 2016, respectively. The awards vest ratably over a four-year period from the date of grant or, in Mr. Burmeister's case, from the first day of employment. When Mr. Miñarro’s employment ended on January 15, 2018, vesting was accelerated with respect to all NQSOs that otherwise would have vested by January 15, 2019, and all other unvested NQSOs were forfeited. For more information, see Footnote 11, “Employee Stock Benefit Plans,” to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2019. The actual values received by the respective named executives depend on the number of NQSOs that actually vest, the number of shares with respect to which NQSOs are exercised and the price of our common stock on the date on which the NQSOs are exercised.

~~(5)~~(4)

Represents ~~(a)~~ amounts earned by the named executives in ~~2016, 2015~~2018, 2017 and ~~2014~~2016 under our SMIP and ~~(b) for 2016, 2015 and 2014, amounts earned by the named executives~~ under the performance cash component of our ~~2014~~2016 LTIP, ~~2013~~2015 LTIP and ~~2012~~2014 LTIP, respectively. The awards under our SMIP were paid in March of ~~2017, 2016~~2019, 2018 and ~~2015,~~2017, respectively, and the awards under the performance cash component of our ~~2014~~2016 LTIP, ~~2013~~2015 LTIP and ~~2012~~2014 LTIP were paid in March of 2019, 2018 and 2017, ~~March of 2016 and February of 2015,~~ respectively. As to Ms. Streeter for 2016, also includes amounts earned by her under the performance cash component of our 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP. The awards to Ms. Streeter under our 2015 SMIP, 2016 SMIP and the performance cash component of our 2013 LTIP, 2014 LTIP, 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP were paid to her in March 2016 upon her termination.

~~(6)~~(5)

Represents the actuarial increase in pension value under our Salary Plan and our SERP. In ~~2015,~~2018, the net pension value under our Salary Plan and our SERP declined for all named executives who ~~are~~were participants under those plans; as a result, for ~~2015~~2018 the amount of the actuarial increase is $0. We do not guarantee any particular rate of return on deferred compensation under our Executive Savings Plan ~~("ESP"~~(“ESP”) or our EDCP. The rate of return depends upon the performance of the fund in which the ~~participant's~~participant’s ESP or EDCP account is deemed invested. Accordingly, the amounts included in this column do not include above-market earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation. Ms. Kovach is the only named executive who is eligible to participate in the Salary Plan and SERP.


~~(7)~~(6)	For ~~2016,~~2018, includes: (i) annual company matching contributions to our 401(k) savings plan (a broad-based plan open to all U.S. salaried employees); (ii) for ~~Ms. Streeter and~~ Mr. ~~White,~~Miñarro, our expense associated with the compensation payable to ~~them~~him in connection with ~~their terminations~~his termination of employment; and (iii) the following perquisites:

Named Executive
EDCP
Matching
Contribution
($)(a)

Tax
Prep /
Financial Planning
($)(b)
Housing Allowance or Relocation Assistance ($)(c)
Tax Gross-Up
($)(d)

Ground
Transport
($)(e)

Airline Club
Membership
($)

Annual Executive Physical
Exam
($)

Legal Fees
($)(f)

Vacation
($)(g)

Total
($)
W. Foley 30,938
11,699
49,416
2,185
1,365
495
2,739
0
0
98,837
S. Streeter 0
537
0
0
109
0
0
0
0
646
S. Buck 12,113
14,000
0
0
1,036
479
0
0
3,587
31,215
A. Cerioli 8,800
13,772
13,551
7,949
707
0
0
0
0
44,779
S. Kovach 4,291
14,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,291
S. Miñarro 0
3,255
51,192
10,195
342
0
0
23,126
0
88,110
J. White 0
0
0
0
1,569
0
0
0
0
1,569



	EDCP Matching Contribution	Tax Prep / Financial Planning	Housing Allowance, Commuting or Relocation Assistance	Tax Gross-Up	Ground Transport	Airline Club Membership	Annual Executive Physical Exam	Total
Named Executive	($)^(a)	($)^(b)	($)^(c)	($)^(d)	($)^(e)	($)	($)	($)
W. Foley	33,000	14,760	51,568	2,996	2,332	495	2,933	108,084
J. Burmeister	0	8,761	0	0	163	495	2,443	11,862
S. Kovach	4,552	14,760	0	0	261	0	0	19,573
S. Miñarro	0	592	0	0	0	0	0	592
W. Mossing	0	12,658	59,463	13,980	424	495	2,121	89,141
S. Zibbel	0	9,948	0	0	1,506	0	0	11,454


(a)	Annual company matching contributions to our EDCP


(b)	The cost we paid for tax return preparation and financial planning for the respective named executives

(c)

As to Mr. Foley, represents ana $45,000 allowance for housing in the Toledo, Ohio, area since Mr. ~~Foley's~~Foley’s primary home is in the Cleveland, Ohio metropolitan ~~area. As~~area and $6,568 in expenses related to ~~Ms. Cerioli, represents relocation assistance provided in connection with her hire.~~commuting between Cleveland and Toledo. Mr. Foley's housing allowance will end effective April 24, 2019. As to Mr. ~~Miñarro,~~Mossing, represents relocation ~~assistance provided in connection with his promotion to his current role.~~expense.


(d)	As to Mr. Foley, ~~and Ms. Cerioli,~~ represents tax ~~gross-ups~~gross-up on ~~a housing allowance and relocation assistance, respectively.~~commuting expense. As to Mr. ~~Miñarro,~~Mossing, represents tax ~~gross-ups~~gross-up on relocation ~~assistance ($7,093) and foreign tax return preparation ($3,102).~~expense.

(e)

Includes our incremental cost for ground transportation for personal and business trips from the Toledo, Ohio, area to the Detroit / Wayne County Metropolitan Airport. For personal trips, includes the entire cost that we incurred for such transportation. For business trips, includes the amount in excess of the amount to which the respective named executives would have been entitled as reimbursement for mileage and parking under our travel policy applicable to all employees.



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~


~~(f)~~	~~Represents payment of legal expenses that Mr. Miñarro incurred in connection with immigration matters relating to his and his family's relocation to the U.S. from Mexico.~~


~~(g)~~	~~Reimbursement of expenses Ms. Buck incurred for a vacation in 2016.~~


~~(8)~~(7)	Mr. Foley assumed his role as CEO effective January 12, 2016. Effective March 24, 2019, he retired from his role as CEO but continues to be employed by the Company as Executive Chairman.


(8)	Mr. Burmeister was hired on March 30, 2017.


(9)	~~Ms. Streeter's~~Mr. Miñarro's employment ended January ~~11, 2016.~~15, 2018.


(10)	~~Ms. Buck's employment ended~~Mr. Mossing was hired on December ~~31, 2016.~~1, 2017.


(11)	Ms. ~~Cerioli~~Zibbel was hired on ~~December 1, 2014.~~April 5, 2018.


~~(12)~~	~~Mr. Miñarro was named Vice President, General Manager, U.S. and Canada, on April 1, 2015. He previously served as Vice President, General Manager, Latin America.~~


~~(13)~~	~~Mr. White was hired on July 13, 2015. His employment ended March 31, 2016.~~

44Libbey Inc.



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

Executive Compensation

~~Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table~~

During 2016, the Compensation Committee granted to our named executives RSUs and NQSOs under our 2006 Omnibus Plan and 2016 LTIP. RSU recipients are not entitled to dividends or voting rights with respect to the common shares underlying the RSUs unless and until they are earned or vested. We do not reprice NQSOs, nor have we repurchased underwater NQSOs. On May 10, 2016, Mr. Foley received an outright grant of common stock under our 2016 Omnibus Plan attributable to his service as a non-management director during the 2015 fiscal year. On February 6, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the payment of cash awards under our 2016 SMIP and our 2014 LTIP.

This table and accompanying footnotes contain information as to each of these awards, including information as to applicable performance measures for our cash awards, and vesting schedules for RSUs and NQSOs.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

During 2018, the Compensation Committee granted to our named executives RSUs under our 2006 Omnibus Plan, 2016 Omnibus Plan and 2018 LTIP. RSU recipients are not entitled to dividends or voting rights with respect to the common shares underlying the RSUs unless and until they are earned or vested. Our executives were not granted any stock options in 2018. On February 4, 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the payment of cash awards under our 2018 SMIP and our 2016 LTIP.

Estimated Possible Payouts under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽²⁾

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares of Stock
or Units
(#)⁽³⁾

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities Underlying
Options
(#)⁽⁴⁾

Exercise or
Base Price of Option Awards
($/Sh)

Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and Option Awards
($)⁽⁵⁾
Named
Executive
Plan Name
Award
Date⁽¹⁾

Grant
Date⁽¹⁾

Threshold
($)

Target
($)

Maximum
($)

W. Foley 2016 SMIP 1/11/2016 165,000
825,000
1,856,250

2016 LTIP (cash) 1/11/2016 247,500
990,000
1,980,000

2015 LTIP (cash) 1/11/2016 326,700
653,400
1,306,800

2014 LTIP (cash) 1/11/2016 81,675
326,700
653,400

2016 LTIP (RSUs) 1/11/2016 2/25/2016 59,855
957,680
2016 LTIP (NQSOs) 1/11/2016 2/25/2016 126,598
17.13
532,688
2016 Omnibus Plan 10/28/2014 5/10/2016 4,551
80,007

S. Streeter 2016 SMIP 1/11/2016

24,057

2016 LTIP (cash) 1/11/2016

9,623

S. Buck 2016 SMIP 2/8/2016 67,498
337,488
759,348

2016 LTIP (cash) 2/8/2016 66,500
266,000
532,000

2016 LTIP (RSUs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 16,082
257,312
2016 LTIP (NQSOs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 34,015
17.13 143,125

A. Cerioli 2016 SMIP 2/8/2016 48,720
243,601
548,102

2016 LTIP (cash) 2/8/2016 48,000
192,001
384,002

2016 LTIP (RSUs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 11,608
185,728
2016 LTIP (NQSOs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 24,553
17.13 103,312

S. Kovach 2016 SMIP 2/8/2016 34,157
170,784
384,264

2016 LTIP (cash) 2/8/2016 31,970
127,878
255,756

2016 LTIP (RSUs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 7,731
123,696
2016 LTIP (NQSOs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 16,353
17.13
68,809

S. Miñarro 2016 SMIP 2/8/2016 42,635
213,175
479,644

2016 LTIP (cash) 2/8/2016 42,005
168,019
336,038

2016 LTIP (RSUs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 10,158
162,528
2016 LTIP (NQSOs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 21,486
17.13 90,407

J. White 2016 SMIP 2/8/2016 79,931
399,656
899,226

2016 LTIP (cash) 2/8/2016 78,750
315,000
630,000

2016 LTIP (RSUs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 19,045
304,720
2016 LTIP (NQSOs) 2/8/2016 2/25/2016 40,281
17.13 169,491
Mr. Miñarro did not receive any grants of plan-based awards due to his employment ending January 15, 2018. The Committee did, however, accelerate the vesting of 3,000 RSUs that were originally granted to Mr. Miñarro in 2015.

This table and accompanying footnotes contain information as to each of these awards, including information as to applicable performance measures for our cash awards and vesting schedules for RSUs.



	Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~



				Estimated Possible Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽²⁾			All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards

Named Executive	Plan Name	Award Date⁽¹⁾	Grant Date⁽¹⁾	Threshold	Target	Maximum
Named Executive	Plan Name	Award Date⁽¹⁾	Grant Date⁽¹⁾	($)	($)	($)	(#)⁽³⁾	($)⁽⁴⁾
W. Foley	2018 SMIP	2/15/18		41,250	825,000	1,650,000
	2018 LTIP (cash)	2/15/18		618,750	1,237,500	2,475,000
	2018 LTIP (RSU)	2/6/18	2/28/18				159,677	814,353
J. Burmeister	2018 SMIP	2/15/18		11,588	231,750	463,500
	2018 LTIP (cash)	2/15/18		93,750	187,500	375,000
	2018 LTIP (RSU)	2/6/18	2/28/18				24,194	123,389
S. Kovach	2018 SMIP	2/15/18		9,038	180,752	361,504
	2018 LTIP (cash)	2/15/18		83,968	167,936	335,872
	2018 LTIP (RSU)	2/6/18	2/28/18				21,669	110,512
S. Miñarro	Omnibus Plan (RSU)	1/9/18	1/15/18				3,000	21,450
W. Mossing	2018 SMIP	2/15/18		7,500	150,000	300,000
	2018 LTIP (cash)	2/15/18		52,500	105,000	210,000
	2018 LTIP (RSU)	2/6/18	2/28/18				13,548	69,095
S. Zibbel	2018 SMIP	3/7/18		5,716	114,313	228,626
	2018 LTIP (cash)	3/7/18		49,729	99,458	198,916
	2018 LTIP (RSU)	3/7/18	5/2/18				14,000	71,470
	Omnibus Plan (RSU)	3/7/18	5/2/18				10,000	48,700

(1)

For ~~Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards made to all named executives other than Mr. Foley and Ms. Streeter, the Award Date and the Grant Date for~~non-equity incentive plan awards, made under the 2016 SMIP and the performance cash component of the 2016 LTIP are the date on which the Compensation Committee approved the 2016 SMIP and the performance cash component of our 2016 LTIP. For Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards made to Mr. Foley, the Award Date and the Grant Date are the date on which the ~~Board~~Compensation Committee approved ~~Mr. Foley's participation in, and target opportunities under,~~ the ~~2016 SMIP and 2016 LTIP. For Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards made to Ms. Streeter, the Award Date and the Grant Date are~~applicable incentive plan or, if later, the date on which the ~~Board~~Committee approved the ~~Mutual Separation Agreement~~executive’s participation in, and ~~Release pursuant to which Ms. Streeter was awarded these exact amounts.~~target opportunity under, the applicable incentive plan. For All Other Stock Awards, ~~and All Other Option Awards,~~except with respect to Mr. Miñarro, the Award Date is the date on which the Compensation Committee took action, and the Grant Date is the date on which we determined the number of ~~NQSOs or~~ RSUs asawarded. With respect to Mr. Miñarro, the ~~case may be, awarded.~~Award Date is the date on which the Compensation Committee approved the accelerated vesting of the RSUs and the Grant Date is the date on which the RSUs vested. The number of ~~NQSOs and~~ RSUs awarded to the named executives ~~in February 2016~~ under our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP was determined by dividing the target dollar value of the applicable component of equity to be awarded by (a) in the case of NQSOs, the Black-Scholes value of the options, determined using the average closing price of Libbey common stock over a period of 20 consecutive trading days ending on the grant date and capping the volatility at 50%, or (b) in the case of RSUs, the average closing price of Libbey common stock over the ~~20 consecutive trading-day period ending February 25, 2016. The number~~fourth quarter of shares of common stock granted to Mr. Foley on May 10, 2016 under our 2016 Omnibus Plan was determined by multiplying the number of shares times $17.58, the closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant.2017. We inform grant recipients of their awards after we determine the number of RSUs ~~and/or NQSOs~~ to be granted. For awards made in February ~~2016,~~2018, we determined the number of RSUs ~~and NQSOs~~ to be granted on the first business day after we announced our results of operations for the ~~2015~~2017 fiscal year. For Ms. Zibbel's awards of RSUs, we determined the number on the first business day after we announced our results of operations for the first quarter of 2018, since her first day of employment occurred during a quiet period.


(2)	Represents the range, as estimated on the award date, of possible cash awards under (a) our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP and (b) the performance cash component of our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP.


(a)	Under our SMIP, each named executive is eligible for an annual incentive award in an amount up to ~~225%~~200% of the executive officer’s target award, which in turn is a percentage of the executive’s anticipated full-year base salary, as set forth in the following table:



~~Named Executive~~		Target Award as a Percentage of Anticipated Full-Year Base Salary ~~(%)~~
Named Executive
W. Foley		~~100~~100%
~~S. Streeter~~J. Burmeister		~~100~~
~~S. Buck~~		70
~~A. Cerioli~~		6060%
S. Kovach		5050%
W. Mossing		50%
S. ~~Miñarro~~Zibbel		60
~~J. White~~		7550%

2019 Proxy Statement 45

Executive Compensation

Under the ~~2016~~2018 SMIP, each named executive has an opportunity to earn a payout based 40% on ~~company performance, although~~company-wide adjusted cash earnings, 15% on e-commerce revenue, 10% on new product revenue and 35% on strategic objectives. The Compensation Committee has discretion to increase or decrease an executive's individual payout under the ~~amount of the payout may be modified up or down by 25%~~2018 SMIP based on the executive's exceptional or unsatisfactory individual ~~performance, as described below. Accordingly, the~~performance. The amount disclosed under the ~~‘‘Threshold’’~~"Threshold" column represents ~~only 20%~~5% of target performance ~~(reflecting~~and assumes achievement of a 50% payout with respect to the ~~maximum downward impact~~new product revenue component (the least heavily weighted component of the ~~individual modifier), while~~2018 SMIP) and 0% with respect to all other components. For additional information regarding the ~~amount disclosed under~~adjusted cash earnings, e-commerce revenue, new product revenue, and strategic objectives metrics, including the ~~“Maximum” column represents 225%~~methods of ~~target performance (reflecting the maximum upward impact~~measure, weighting of ~~the individual modifier). As noted under‘‘Compensation Discussion~~components, and ~~Analysis — Executive Summary — 2016 Executive Compensation Highlights’’~~ ~~and~~payout scales, see ‘"~~‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis —~~ What pay did ~~Libbey’s executives~~Libbey's executive's receive for ~~2016?,’’~~2018? ~~the performance metrics under the financial performance component were revenue growth and adjusted~~" starting on page 29. Adjusted cash earnings ~~each of which~~ is calculated as shown in Appendix AB..

For all of our named executives, 100% of their opportunity was based on company-wide performance, as reflected in company-wide revenue growth (net sales) and adjusted cash earnings performance metrics. The payout scales with respect to each of the metrics were as follows:

Revenue Growth (Net Sales) Adjusted Cash Earnings
Full Year
Net Sales
Percent of Targeted Net Sales Performance Level Payout Percentage Full Year Cash Earnings Percent of Targeted Cash Earnings Performance Level Payout Percentage
$880,000 104.9% Maximum 200% $131,076 110.0% Maximum 200%
$839,138 100.0% Target 100% $119,160 100.0% Target 100%
$800,000 95.3% Threshold 40% $95,328 80.0% Threshold 50%
< $800,000 < 95.3% Below Threshold 0% < $95,328 < 80.0%
Below
Threshold
0%



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

(b)

Under the performance cash component of our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP, each named executive is eligible for a cash award in an amount up to 200% of the named executive’s target award. Each named executive’s target award under the performance cash component is ~~40%~~50% of the named executive’s target award under all components of the relevant LTIP. The target awards are based on the named ~~executives'~~executives’ respective annualized base salaries as of January 1, ~~2016~~2018 (in the case of ~~Mr. Foley, January 12, 2016)~~Ms. Zibbel, April 5, 2018). The target awards for executives whose participation begins mid-cycle are prorated accordingly. Each named executive’s target award under all components of the ~~2016~~2018 LTIP is set forth in the following table:



	2018 Target Long-Term Award as a Percentage of Annualized Base Salary	2018 LTIP Performance Cash Target as a Percentage of Annualized Base Salary
Named Executive
W. Foley	300%	150%
J. Burmeister	100%	50%
S. Kovach	95%	48%
W. Mossing	70%	35%
S. Zibbel	70%	32%

The extent to which a payout is earned under the performance cash component of the ~~2016~~2018 LTIP is based on our ~~return on invested capital (ROIC)~~adjusted EBITDA for each of ~~the three one-year performance periods (calendar years 2016, 2017~~2018, 2019 and ~~2018) included in the three-year performance cycle ended December 31, 2018. ROIC~~2020. Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as shown in Appendix A. The scale used to determine the payout score for each of the three ~~one-year~~1-year performance periods is reset for each performance period to correlate with targeted ~~ROIC~~adjusted EBITDA for that year. The amount of the final payout, if any, will be determined based on the average of the three discrete, single-year payout scores. The scale used to determine the payout score for the ~~2016~~2018 calendar year is:

Basis Points Above or Below 2016 Targeted ROIC
Payout
Score
(%)

+100 200
0 100
-150 25

Less than -150

0



Percent of 2018 Targeted Adjusted EBITDA		Payout Score
112.5%		200%
0		100%
87.5%		50%
Less than 87.5%		0%

(3)

Represents grants of RSUs made under our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP and asan award of sign-on RSUs to Ms. Zibbel. The grants under our 2018 LTIP vest 25% per year beginning April 5, 2019, for Ms. Zibbel, and beginning on February 17, 2019, for all other executives. The 10,000 sign-on RSUs awarded to Ms. Zibbel cliff vest on April 5, 2021, the third anniversary of her date of hire. For Mr. Miñarro, represents 3,000 RSUs for which the Compensation Committee exercised discretion to accelerate vesting in connection with Mr. Miñarro's termination of employment. These RSUs were originally granted to Mr. ~~Foley, an outright grant of common stock attributable to his service as a non-management director during~~Miñarro in 2015.


(4)	~~Represents grants of NQSOs made under our 2016 LTIP. The grants vest 25% per year beginning on February 17, 2016.~~

~~(5)~~

~~Represents~~Except for Mr. Miñarro, represents the respective grant date fair values, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the RSUs. For Mr. Miñarro, represents the incremental fair value of 3,000 RSUs ~~and NQSOs.~~for which the Compensation Committee exercised discretion to accelerate vesting in connection with Mr. Miñarro's termination of employment. These RSUs were originally granted to Mr. Miñarro in 2015.

46Libbey Inc.

~~Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table~~

Executive Compensation

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE

Our named executives had the following types of equity awards outstanding at the end of the ~~2016~~2018 fiscal year:

NQSOs granted under our ~~2006~~2016 Omnibus Plan and predecessor plans; and

RSUs granted under our ~~2006~~2016 Omnibus ~~Plan;~~Plan and

~~Cash-settled SARs granted under our 2006 Omnibus Plan.~~ predecessor plans.

The following table shows, for each of the named executives, as of December 31, ~~2016~~2018: (a) the number, exercise price and expiration date of NQSOs ~~and cash-settled SARs~~ that were vested but not yet exercised and of NQSOs that were not vested; and (b) the number and market value of RSUs that were not vested.

Mr. White had no outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2016. Pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements, upon termination of Mr. White's employment on March 31, 2016, vesting was accelerated as to all NQSOs and RSUs that otherwise would have vested within one year of his termination date. All other unvested NQSOs and RSUs were forfeited. Vested NQSOs expired on June 29, 2016. For additional information, see footnote (3) to the Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment table below.



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

~~OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END~~

Option Awards Stock Awards
Named Executive
Award
Date⁽¹⁾

Grant
Date⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable⁽³⁾

Option Exercise
Price
($)

Option
Expiration
Date

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)⁽⁵⁾
W. Foley 1/11/2016 2/25/2016 0
126,598
17.13
2/25/2026 59,855
1,164,778

S. Streeter⁽⁶⁾
12/9/2013 12/16/2013 240,829
0
21.29
1/11/2017

S. Buck⁽⁷⁾
7/6/2012 8/1/2012 33,389
0
13.96
3/31/2017 0
0
2/11/2013 2/22/2013 8,953
0
19.02
2/22/2023 0
0
2/17/2014 2/24/2014 5,370
0
23.02
2/24/2024 0
0
2/16/2015 3/2/2015 2,246
0
38.06
3/31/2017 0
0

A. Cerioli 10/27/2014 12/1/2014 2,746
2,745
29.50
12/1/2024 4,178
81,304
2/16/2015 3/2/2015 1,321
3,963
38.06
3/2/2025 2,934
57,096
6/11/2015 6/12/2015 1,875
36,488
2/8/2016 2/25/2016 0
24,553
17.13
2/25/2026 11,608
225,892

S. Kovach 2/4/2008 2/15/2008 3,621
0
15.35
2/15/2018
2/7/2011 2/10/2011 3,625
0
17.00
2/10/2021
2/6/2012 2/17/2012 4,624
0
13.95
2/17/2022
2/11/2013 2/22/2013 5,177
1,725
19.02
2/22/2023 1,513
29,443
2/17/2014 2/24/2014 3,207
3,206
23.02
2/24/2024 2,817
54,819
2/16/2015 3/2/2015 1,172
3,513
38.06
3/2/2025 2,601
50,615
2/8/2016 2/25/2016 0
16,353
17.13
2/25/2026 7,731
150,445

S. Miñarro 2/4/2008 2/15/2008 3,200
0
15.35
2/15/2018
2/9/2009 2/27/2009 3,500
0
1.01
2/27/2019
2/8/2010 2/11/2010 6,000
0
10.13
2/11/2020
12/6/2010 12/31/2010 20,000
0
15.47
12/31/2020
2/7/2011 2/10/2011 7,000
0
17.00
2/10/2021
2/6/2012 2/17/2012 7,500
0
13.95
2/17/2022
7/5/2012 8/1/2012 3,597
0
13.96
8/1/2022
2/11/2013 2/22/2013 5,939
1,979
19.02
2/22/2023 1,734
33,744
2/17/2014 2/24/2014 3,291
3,291
23.02
2/24/2024 2,891
56,259
2/16/2015 3/2/2015 1,585
4,755
38.06
3/2/2025 12,521
243,659
2/8/2016 2/25/2016 0
21,486
17.13
2/25/2026 10,158
197,675

J. White⁽⁸⁾



	Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End



			Option Awards				Stock Awards
Named Executive	Award Date⁽¹⁾	Grant Date⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable⁽³⁾	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)⁽⁴⁾	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)⁽⁵⁾
W. Foley	1/11/16	2/25/16	63,299	63,299	17.13	2/25/26	29,927	116,117
	2/13/17	3/1/17	22,138	66,412	13.60	3/1/27	32,834	127,396
	2/5/18	2/28/18					159,677	619,547
J. Burmeister	3/16/17	5/3/17	5,297	15,889	9.38	5/3/27	7,008	27,191
	2/5/18	2/28/18					24,194	93,873
S. Kovach	2/7/11	2/10/11	3,625	0	17.00	2/10/21
	2/6/12	2/17/12	4,624	0	13.95	2/17/22
	2/11/13	2/22/13	6,902	0	19.02	2/22/23
	2/17/14	2/24/14	6,413	0	23.02	2/24/24
	2/16/15	3/2/15	3,514	1,171	38.06	3/2/25	867	3,364
	2/8/16	2/25/16	8,177	8,176	17.13	2/25/26	3,865	14,996
	2/13/17	3/1/17	2,917	8,749	13.60	3/1/27	4,326	16,785
	2/5/18	2/28/18					21,669	84,076
S. Miñarro	2/8/10	2/11/10	6,000	0	10.13	2/11/20
W. Mossing	11/5/17	12/1/17	7,531	22,592	6.75	12/1/27	6,682	25,926
	11/5/17	12/1/17					14,000	54,320
	2/5/18	2/28/18					13,548	52,566
S. Zibbel	3/7/18	5/2/18					14,000	54,320
	3/7/18	5/2/18					10,000	38,800


(1)	The Award Date is the date on which the Compensation Committee took action, and the Grant Date is the date on which we determined the number of NQSOs or RSUs, as the case may be, awarded.

(2)

See ‘‘“Compensation Discussion and Analysis — How does Libbey determine the forms and amounts of executive pay? — Equity Grants Under Our ~~Equity Grant Practices’’~~LTIP”for information as to how we determine the number of NQSOs and RSUs awarded to our named executives. We inform grant recipients of their awards after we determine the number of NQSOs and/or RSUs to be granted. For awards made in February ~~2016,~~2018, the grant date was the first business day after we announced our results of operations for the ~~2015~~2017 fiscal year. For awards made in May 2018, the grant date was the first business day after we announced our financial results for the first quarter of 2018.

(3)

Represents NQSOs awarded under our ~~2006~~ Omnibus ~~Plan.~~Plans. NQSOs granted before 2015 vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. NQSOs granted to Mr. Burmeister in ~~2015 and 2016~~May 2017 vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of March 30, 2017, his first day of employment. NQSOs granted to Ms. Mossing vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of December 1, 2017, his first day of employment. All other NQSOs vest 25% per year for four years beginning on February 17th of the year after the grant.

(4)

Represents RSUs awarded under our ~~2006~~ Omnibus ~~Plan.~~Plans. One share of our common stock underlies each RSU. RSUs granted in ~~2013, 2014~~February 2016, March 2017, and ~~on June 12, 2015 vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. All other RSUs~~February 2018 vest 25% per year for four years beginning on February 17th of the year after the grant. The 14,000 sign-on RSUs granted to Mr. Mossing on December 1, 2017 cliff vest on December 1, 2020, the third anniversary of his start date. The 10,000 sign-on RSUs granted to Ms. Zibbel on May 2, 2018 cliff vest on April 5, 2021, the third anniversary of her start date, while the remaining 14,000 RSUs granted to Ms. Zibbel in 2018 vest ratably over four years starting on April 5, 2019. All other RSUs vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date.


(5)	Represents the market value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of unvested RSUs. We have estimated the market value by multiplying the number of shares of common stock underlying the RSUs by ~~$19.46,~~$3.88, the closing price of our common stock on ~~December 30, 2016,~~ the last trading day of ~~2016.~~2018.

2019 Proxy Statement 47



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

Executive Compensation


~~(6)~~	The special retention award of cash-settled SARs made to Ms. Streeter in December 2013 was scheduled to cliff vest on December 31, 2018; however, all 240,829 cash-settled SARs vested automatically upon Ms. Streeter's termination of employment on January 11, 2016. For additional information, see footnote (8) to the Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment table below.


~~(7)~~	~~Pursuant to the terms of the applicable NQSO and RSU award agreements, upon Ms. Buck's resignation on December 31, 2016, all unvested NQSOs and RSUs were forfeited.~~


~~(8)~~	Mr. White had no outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2016. When Mr. White's employment ended on March 31, 2016, vesting was accelerated as to all NQSOs and RSUs that otherwise would have vested within one year of his termination date. All other unvested NQSOs and RSUs were forfeited. Vested NQSOs expired on June 29, 2016.

~~Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2016 Table~~OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED FOR FISCAL 2018 TABLE

The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of stock options by the named executives in ~~2016~~2018 and the value of RSUs that vested in ~~2016.~~

~~OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN FISCAL 2016~~2018.

Option Awards Stock Awards
Named Executive
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise
(#)

Value Realized on Exercise
($)⁽¹⁾

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
($)⁽²⁾

Value Realized on
Vesting
($)⁽³⁾
W. Foley 0
0
4,551
80,007
S. Streeter    54,801
129,731
150,029
2,937,568
S. Buck    0
0
11,747
212,777
A. Cerioli    0
0
3,693
66,863
S. Kovach 0
0
5,586
96,832
S. Miñarro    2,882
21,846
8,584
149,804
J. White    10,071
9,265
15,564
289,490



	Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2018



	Option Awards		Stock Awards
Named Executive	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized on Exercise ($)⁽¹⁾	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting ($)⁽²⁾	Value Realized on Vesting ($)⁽³⁾
W. Foley	0	0	25,909	157,268
J. Burmeister	0	0	2,336	11,423
S. Kovach	0	0	5,651	34,317
S. Miñarro	3,500	24,612	13,055	96,364
W. Mossing	0	0	2,228	13,390
S. Zibbel	0	0	0	0


(1)	Represents the sum of the differences between the market prices and the exercise prices for the respective awards of NQSOs exercised by the named ~~executive officers~~executives during ~~2016.~~2018.


(2)	As to Mr. Foley, represents grant of unrestricted common stock in 2016. As to Ms. Streeter, represents 34,342 RSUs and 115,687 cash-settled RSUs that vested during 2016. As to all other named executives, representsRepresents the number of RSUs that vested during ~~2016.~~2018.

(3)

As to Mr. Foley, represents the value of unrestricted common stock granted in 2016, the value of which was determined by multiplying the number of shares by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date: $17.58. As to all other named executives, representsRepresents the value of RSUs ~~including cash-settled RSUs,~~ that vested during ~~2016.~~2018. The value was determined by multiplying the number of shares by the closing price of our common stock on the applicable vesting dates:



~~Vesting Date~~		~~Closing Price~~ ~~($)~~
~~January 11, 2016~~		~~19.58~~
~~February 17, 2016~~		~~16.75~~
~~February 22, 2016~~		~~17.56~~
~~February 24, 2016~~		~~18.20~~
~~March 31, 2016~~		~~18.60~~
~~June 12, 2016~~		~~16.80~~
~~August 1, 2016~~		~~18.80~~
~~December 1, 2016~~		~~19.13~~



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~
	Vesting Date		Closing Price ($)
	January 15, 2018		7.71
	February 17, 2018		6.07
	February 24, 2018		6.08
	February 26, 2018		6.13
	March 30, 2018		4.89
	December 1, 2018		6.01

48Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation

~~Pension Benefits in Fiscal 2016 Table~~PENSION BENEFITS IN FISCAL 2018 TABLE

Executives hired before January 1, 2006, are eligible for benefits under our Salary Plan and our SERP. Of our named executives, only Ms. Kovach is eligible for benefits under the Salary Plan and SERP. None of our other named executives is eligible for a pension benefit under our Salary Plan or SERP because each joined Libbey after December 31, 2005.

The Salary Plan is a qualified plan, and the SERP is an excess, non-qualified plan designed to provide substantially identical retirement benefits as the Salary Plan to the extent that the Salary Plan cannot provide those benefits due to limitations in the Internal Revenue Code. Benefits under the Salary Plan and SERP are determined by annual contribution credits equal to a percentage of annual earnings plus interest. Ms. Kovach is eligible for a pension benefit under the Salary Plan and SERP under the cash balance formula, which is based upon the value of a notional account that had an opening balance determined in accordance with the final average pay formula described below as of January 1, 1998. Under the cash balance formula, the account balance is increased each year with a contribution amount based on the sum of age and years of service with Libbey and with interest based upon the 30-year Treasury rate.

The final average pay formula is: ~~[(A) x (B) x (C)] + [(D) x (E) x~~

[(A) × (B) × (C)] + [(D) × (E) × (C)] + [(F) + (A) + (G)]

Where:

~~(A) Monthly final average earnings for the three highest consecutive calendar years before 2008~~

~~(B) 1.212%~~

~~(C) Years of credited service up to 35 years~~

~~(D) Monthly final average earnings above Social Security Wage base at retirement~~

~~(E) 0.176%~~

~~(F) 0.5%~~

~~(G) Years of credited service over 35 years~~


(A)	Monthly final average earnings for the three highest consecutive calendar years before 2008


(B)	1.212%


(C)	Years of credited service up to 35 years


(D)	Monthly final average earnings above Social Security Wage base at retirement


(E)	0.176%


(F)	0.5%


(G)	Years of credited service over 35 years

Only base salary and amounts earned under the SMIP are included in calculating final average earnings.

The retirement benefit may be adjusted if the employee has more or less than 35 years of credited service or retired before age 65. The Salary Plan and the SERP provide for additional benefit accruals beyond age 65 and for annual annuity benefits as well as an optional lump sum form of benefit. Ms. Kovach is entitled to a benefit computed only in accordance with the cash balance formula. None of our other named executives is eligible for a pension benefit under our Salary Plan or our SERP because their employment with Libbey did not begin before January 1, 2006.

The following table sets forth information concerning the benefits provided to ~~the named executives~~Ms. Kovach under the Salary Plan and the SERP as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, the date that we use for pension plan measurement for financial statement reporting purposes.

~~PENSION BENEFITS IN FISCAL 2016 TABLE~~

Named Executive    Plan Name
Number of Years of Credited Service
(#)⁽¹⁾

Present Value of Accumulated Benefit
($)⁽²⁾

Payments During Last Fiscal Year
($)
W. Foley N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
S. Streeter    N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
S. Buck    N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
A. Cerioli    N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
S. Kovach Salary Plan 13.08
164,229
0
SERP 13.08
125,254
0
S. Miñarro    N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
J. White    N/A N/A
N/A
N/A



	Pension Benefits in Fiscal 2018 Table



Named Executive	Plan Name	Number of Years of Credited Service (#)⁽¹⁾	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)⁽²⁾	Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
S. Kovach	Salary Plan	15.08	172,141	0
	SERP	15.08	136,694	0


(1)	Represents actual years of service to Libbey. The plans were frozen at the end of 2012, after which additional pension service is not credited.


(2)	Amounts were determined based on the assumptions outlined in our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, except that ~~all named executives who are eligible for pension benefits under the Salary Plan are~~Ms. Kovach is assumed to receive benefits under the cash balance design at ~~their~~her normal retirement age of 65.

2019 Proxy Statement 49



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

Executive Compensation

~~Nonqualified Deferred Compensation~~NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth information with respect to our EDCP. The EDCP was the only nonqualified deferred compensation plan under which employees could defer pay earned in ~~2016:~~

~~NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION IN FISCAL 2016 TABLE~~

2018:

Executive
Contributions
in Last FY

Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY

Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions
in Last FY

Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE⁽³⁾
Named Executive ($) RSUs
($)⁽¹⁾
RSUs
($)⁽²⁾
RSUs ($) RSUs ($) RSUs
W. Foley 30,938
0 30,938
0 6
0 0
0 61,881
0
S. Streeter 2,117
0 0
0 (24,001 ) 0 (388,925 ) 0 0
0
S. Buck 12,113
0 12,113
0 2,055
131 0
0 83,480
5,310
A. Cerioli 68,800
0 8,800
0 1,830
0 0
0 79,430
0
S. Kovach 4,291
0 4,291
0 1,011
407 0
0 69,922
16,530
S. Miñarro 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
J. White 6,563
0 0
0 839
0 (40,696 ) 0 0
0



	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in Fiscal 2018 Table



	Executive Contributions in Last FY		Registrant Contributions in Last FY		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY			Aggregate Withdrawals /Distributions in Last FY		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE⁽³⁾
Named Executive	($)	RSUs	($)⁽¹⁾	RSUs	($)⁽²⁾		RSUs	($)	RSUs	($)	RSUs
W. Foley	33,000	0	33,000	0	2,051		0	0	0	189,686	0
J. Burmeister	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	0
S. Kovach	4,552	0	4,552	0	(5,402	)	286	0	0	77,624	17,720
S. Miñarro	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	0
W. Mossing	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	0
S. Zibbel	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	0


(1)	The following amounts are ~~included in the column headed~~ ~~‘‘All~~reported as “All Other ~~Compensation’’~~Compensation” in the Summary Compensation ~~Table above:~~Table: Mr. Foley ~~— $30,938;~~- $33,000; Ms. ~~Buck — $12,113; Ms. Cerioli — $8,800; Ms. Kovach— $4,291.~~ Kovach - $4,552.


(2)	Not included in the Summary Compensation Table because earnings are not at an above-market rate.


(3)	Of the total amounts in this column, the following amounts are reported as ~~‘‘Salary’’~~“Salary” or ~~‘‘Stock Awards’’~~“Stock Awards” in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement for the ~~2016, 2015~~2018, 2017 and/or ~~2014~~2016 fiscal years:

Named Executive
Salary
($)

Stock Awards
($)
W. Foley 30,938
0
S. Streeter 381,251
0
S. Buck 35,288
0
A. Cerioli 68,800
0
S. Kovach 10,923
0
S. Miñarro 0
0
J. White 28,875
0



Named Executive	Salary ($)	Stock Awards ($)
W. Foley	93,638	0
S. Kovach	12,202	0

Under the EDCP, our named executives and other members of senior management may defer base pay, cash incentive and bonus compensation and RSUs into an account that is deemed invested in one of 13 measurement funds, including a Libbey common stock measurement fund. RSUs in all events are deemed invested in the Libbey common stock measurement fund. We selected these funds to provide measurement options similar to the investment options provided under our 401(k) plan. Participants make deferral elections with respect to cash pay and RSUs before the year in which they are earned or they vest.

Participants can defer (a) up to 60% of the amount by which base salary exceeds required payroll obligations and 401(k) plan contributions; (b) up to 60% of the amount by which cash incentive or bonus compensation exceeds required payroll obligations; and (c) up to 100% of RSUs that are earned or vest during the year to which the deferral relates. We provide matching contributions on excess contributions of base salary in the same manner as we provide matching contributions under our 401(k) plan. The matching contributions are deemed invested in accordance with the participant’s election as to his or her own contributions.

The balance credited to a participant’s account, including the matching contributions that we make, is 100% vested at all times. However, the EDCP is not funded and, as a result, EDCP account balances are subject to the claims of our creditors.

We must pay the account balance in a lump sum ~~made~~ on, or in installments ~~that begin~~beginning on, the distribution date elected by the participant. However, if a participant dies before his or her account balance is distributed in full, we must distribute the account balance in a lump sum to the participant’s beneficiaries ~~no later than~~within 60 days after the participant’s death. If a participant ceases to be a Libbey employee before his or her ~~62nd~~ 62^ndbirthday, we must pay the participant his or her account balance in a lump sum within 60 days after ~~the date of~~ his or her separation from service, unless the participant is a ~~‘‘specified~~



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~

~~employee’’~~“specified employee” for purposes of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. In that event, we must pay the participant his or her account balance on the first day of the seventh month after his or her separation from service. If a participant ceases to be a Libbey employee on or after his or her 62nd birthday, we must distribute the account balance either in a lump sum or in installments, as elected by the participant, on or beginning on the distribution date elected by the participant. In that event, the distribution date cannot be later than the January 1st immediately following the participant’s 75th birthday. If, however, the executive is a ~~‘‘specified employee’’~~“specified employee” for purposes of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, we cannot distribute the account balance, or begin distributing the account balance, to the participant before the first day of the seventh month after the participant’s separation from service. Finally, if a change in control, as defined in the EDCP, occurs, a participant’s entire account balance will be distributed to him or her within 30 days after the change in control.

EDCP hardship distributions are permitted, but there are no loan provisions. All EDCP distributions are fully taxable. Rollovers to defer taxes are not permitted.

50Libbey Inc.

~~Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control~~

Executive Compensation

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

As discussed under “‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Potential Payments ~~Upon~~upon Termination or Change in Control’’,” we have a letter agreement with Mr. Foley and, for all non-CEO named executives, an Executive Severance Compensation Policy and change in control agreements pursuant to which they may be entitled to severance payments and/or other benefits upon termination of their employment, including in connection with a change in control of Libbey.

The terms of our RSU and NQSO award agreements provide for acceleration of unvested awards in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances. Additionally, the terms of award agreements relating to the performance cash components of our ~~2014 LTIP (for the 2014-2016 performance cycle), 2015 LTIP (for the 2015-2017 performance cycle) and~~ 2016 LTIP (for the 2016-2018 performance cycle), 2017 LTIP (for the 2017-2019 performance cycle) and 2018 LTIP (for the 2018-2020 performance cycle) provide for payouts in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances.

Mr. ~~White's~~Miñarro’s employment ended effective ~~March 31, 2016.~~January 15, 2018. His termination was ~~treated as a termination by Libbey~~ without Cause under the Executive Severance Compensation Policy, and he received severance benefits and payments pursuant to the terms of the Executive Severance Compensation Policy and the agreements pursuant to which awards of RSUs, NQSOs and performance cash awards were ~~made.~~made, with the following exception: The ~~amounts~~Committee elected to accelerate the vesting of ~~these severance~~3,000 unvested RSUs that were awarded to Mr. Miñarro in 2015 to replace the value of certain pension and social security benefits that Mr. Miñarro forfeited when he was promoted to Vice President, General Manager, U.S. and ~~payments are set forth under "Involuntary termination without Cause - no change in control triggering event."~~

~~Ms. Buck voluntarily resigned effective December 31, 2016. She received no severance benefits or payments in connection~~Canada, from his previous position with ~~her resignation.~~

~~For each of Ms. Streeter,~~Libbey's Mexican subsidiary. Had the Committee not exercised its discretion to accelerate vesting, the 3,000 RSUs would have been forfeited upon Mr. ~~White and Ms. Buck, the~~Miñarro's termination. The amounts reflected in the table on the following page are the amounts actually payable to ~~each of them~~Mr. Miñarro in connection with ~~their respective terminations~~his termination of employment.

With respect to all other named executives, the table provides information with respect to the amounts payable to each of them based upon the following significant assumptions:

We have assumed that the ~~executive's~~executive’s employment terminated on December 31, ~~2016~~2018, under the various scenarios described in the table.

For purposes of illustrating the amounts payable on or in connection with a change in control, we have assumed that a change in control occurred on December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, and that the named ~~executive's~~executive’s employment terminated concurrently with the change in control.

Ms. Kovach is the only named executive eligible for benefits under our Salary Plan and SERP. As of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, Ms. Kovach was at least age 55 and had at least five years of service with Libbey. As a result, Ms. Kovach would have been eligible to receive a retirement benefit under our Salary Plan and SERP if she had retired on or before December 31, ~~2016.~~2018. If any of our ~~other~~non-CEO named executives had retired on or before December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, all unvested equity awards would have been forfeited.

2019 Proxy Statement 51

Executive Compensation



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~	Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment⁽¹⁾

~~POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT~~⁽¹⁾

Named Executive
Cash
Severance
($)

Annual
Incentive for
Year of
Termination
($)

LTIP Cash
($)⁽²⁾

Acceleration of
Unvested
Equity Awards
($)⁽³⁾

Misc. Benefits
($)

Total
($)
William A. Foley
Death or permanent disability⁽⁴⁾
0
556,000
980,100
1,459,752
0
2,995,852
Voluntary termination⁽⁵⁾
0
556,000
759,550
0
0
1,315,550
Involuntary termination without Cause - no change in control⁽⁶⁾
0
556,000
759,550
364,944
0
1,680,494
Involuntary termination without Cause in connection with a change in control⁽⁷⁾
0
556,000
1,459,854
1,459,752
0
3,475,606
Involuntary termination for Cause 0
0
0
0
0
0

Stephanie A. Streeter
Involuntary termination without Cause - no change in control⁽⁸⁾
3,193,000
24,057
629,609
2,978,115
106,618
6,931,399

Sherry Buck
Voluntary termination without Good Reason - no change in control⁽⁹⁾
0
0
0
0
0
0

Annunciata Cerioli
Death or permanent disability⁽¹⁰⁾
0
141,670
254,404
457,987
0
854,061
Voluntary termination for Good Reason - no change in control⁽¹¹⁾
0
0
176,576
0
0
176,576
Involuntary termination without Cause - no change in control⁽¹²⁾
704,006
141,670
176,576
142,623
93,393
1,258,268
Voluntary termination for Good Reason or involuntary termination without Cause - change in control⁽¹³⁾
1,408,012
141,670
314,631
457,987
106,507
2,428,807
Involuntary termination for Cause 0
0
0
0
0
0

Susan A. Kovach
Death or permanent disability⁽¹⁰⁾
0
118,695
247,101
324,184
0
689,980
Retirement⁽¹⁴⁾
0
118,695
0
0
289,483
408,178
Voluntary termination for Good Reason - no change in control⁽¹¹⁾
0
0
170,540
0
0
170,540
Involuntary termination without Cause - no change in control⁽¹²⁾
514,875
118,695
170,540
121,617
88,454
1,014,181
Voluntary termination for Good Reason or involuntary termination without Cause - change in control⁽¹³⁾
1,029,750
118,695
267,688
324,184
84,585
1,824,902
Involuntary termination for Cause 0
0
0
0
0
0

Salvador Miñarro Villalobos
Death or permanent disability⁽¹⁰⁾
0
148,156
292,952
582,269
0
1,023,377
Voluntary termination for Good Reason – no change in control⁽¹¹⁾
0
0
199,709
0
0
199,709
Involuntary termination without Cause -- no change in control⁽¹²⁾
571,266
148,156
199,709
205,905
93,393
1,218,429
Voluntary termination for Good Reason or involuntary termination without Cause - change in control⁽¹³⁾
1,142,532
148,156
328,177
582,269
94,062
2,295,196
Involuntary termination for Cause 0
0
0
0
0
0

James H. White
Involuntary termination without Cause -- no change in control⁽¹¹⁾
918,750
68,414
93,209
324,295
93,808
1,498,476



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~



Named Executive	Event	Cash Severance ($)	Annual Incentive for Year of Termination ($)	LTIP Cash ($)⁽²⁾	Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards ($)⁽³⁾	Misc. Benefits ($)	Total ($)
W. Foley	Death or permanent disability⁽⁴⁾	0	819,775	2,227,124	863,059	0	3,909,958
	Voluntary resignation⁽⁵⁾	0	819,775	744,779	116,117	0	1,680,671
	Termination without Cause - no change in control⁽⁶⁾	0	819,775	744,779	313,473	0	1,878,027
	Termination without Cause - no change in control⁽⁶⁾
	Termination without Cause - change in control⁽⁷⁾	0	819,775	1,432,530	863,059	0	3,115,364
	Termination for Cause	0	0	0	0	0	0
J. Burmeister	Death or permanent disability⁽⁴⁾	0	230,282	260,275	121,064	0	611,621
	Quit for Good Reason - no change in control⁽⁸⁾	0	0	95,589	0	0	95,589
	Termination without Cause - no change in control⁽⁹⁾	624,000	230,282	95,589	32,534	86,557	1,068,962
	Termination without Cause - no change in control⁽⁹⁾
	Quit for Good Reason or termination without Cause - change in control⁽¹⁰⁾	1,248,000	230,282	199,793	121,064	88,751	1,887,890

	Termination for Cause	0	0	0	0	0	0
S. Kovach	Death or permanent disability⁽⁴⁾	0	179,607	292,501	119,221	0	591,329
	Retirement⁽¹¹⁾	0	179,607	0	0	308,835	488,442
	Quit for Good Reason - no change in control⁽⁸⁾	0	0	98,709	0	0	98,709
	Termination without Cause - no change in control⁽⁹⁾	546,231	179,607	98,709	37,481	88,220	950,248
	Termination without Cause - no change in control⁽⁹⁾
	Quit for Good Reason or Termination without Cause - change in control⁽¹⁰⁾	1,092,462	179,607	191,497	119,221	87,370	1,670,157

	Termination for Cause	0	0	0	0	0	0
S. Miñarro	Termination without Cause — no change in control⁽¹²⁾	579,835	0	22,541	190,342	93,219	885,937
	Termination without Cause — no change in control⁽¹²⁾
W. Mossing	Death or permanent disability⁽⁴⁾	0	135,500	103,270	132,812	0	371,582
	Quit for Good Reason – no change in control⁽⁸⁾	0	0	41,956	0	0	41,956
	Termination without Cause — no change in control⁽¹³⁾	225,000	135,500	41,956	21,786	84,248	508,490
	Termination without Cause — no change in control⁽¹³⁾
	Quit for Good Reason or termination without Cause - change in control⁽¹⁰⁾	900,000	135,500	100,298	132,812	85,659	1,354,269

	Termination for Cause	0	0	0	0	0	0
S. Zibbel	Death or permanent disability⁽⁴⁾	0	103,263	75,950	93,120	0	272,333
	Quit for Good Reason - no change in control⁽⁸⁾	0	0	31,400	0	0	31,400
	Termination without Cause - no change in control⁽¹⁴⁾	155,001	103,263	31,400	13,580	46,148	349,392
	Termination without Cause - no change in control⁽¹⁴⁾
	Quit for Good Reason or termination without Cause - change in control⁽¹⁰⁾	930,006	103,263	91,677	93,120	85,359	1,303,425

	Termination for Cause	0	0	0	0	0	0

(1)

Represents potential payments pursuant to equity award agreements, ~~(including award agreements for cash-settled retention RSUs and cash-settled retention SARs),~~ performance cash award agreements and (a) in the case of the ~~named~~ executives other than ~~Ms. Streeter or~~ Mr. Foley, Mr. Mossing and Ms. Zibbel, our Executive Severance Compensation Policy or their respective change in control agreements, as applicable, (b) in the case of Mr. Foley, his Letter Agreement, and (c)in the case of Mr. Mossing and Ms. ~~Streeter, her Mutual Separation and Release Agreement.~~Zibbel, their respective employment offer letters or change in control agreements, as applicable. Only Ms. Kovach was eligible for retirement ~~eligible~~benefits as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2018.

(2)

As to those triggering events for which we estimated future payouts under the performance cash component of our ~~2015~~2017 LTIP and ~~2016~~2018 LTIP, we estimated the payout under the performance cash component of our ~~2015~~2017 LTIP assuming achievement at ~~51%~~33% of target performance, and we estimated the payout under the performance cash component of our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP assuming achievement of ~~89%~~67% of target performance. The amounts actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2017 LTIP and 2018 LTIP would be paid between January 1 and March 15 of the calendar year following the conclusion of the applicable performance cycle.

(3)

For those triggering events that result in acceleration of unvested equity awards: (a) except as to RSUs ~~(including cash-settled RSUs)~~ granted to ~~Ms. Streeter and~~ Mr. ~~White,~~Miñarro, we have estimated the value of common stock underlying RSUs by multiplying the applicable number of RSUs by ~~$19.46,~~$3.88, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, ~~2016;~~2018; and (b) except as to RSUs ~~(including cash-settled RSUs)~~ granted to ~~Ms. Streeter and~~ Mr. ~~White,~~Miñarro, we have determined the ~~in-the-money /~~ in-the-money/intrinsic value of the applicable NQSOs by deducting the respective exercise prices for the NQSOs from ~~$19.46~~$3.88 and multiplying the result (if greater than zero) by the applicable number of NQSOs. As to ~~Ms. Streeter,~~Mr. Miñarro, the values for ~~the RSUs (including cash-settled RSUs), NQSOs and cash-settled SARs were calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on January 11, 2016, which was $19.58. As to Mr. White, the values of~~ the RSUs and NQSOs were calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on ~~March 31, 2016,~~January 12, 2018, which was ~~$18.60.~~ $7.71.

52Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation


(4)	Represents the sum of:


(a)	under ~~"Annual~~“Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,"” the amount actually earned under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP;


(b)	under ~~"LTIP~~“LTIP Cash,"” a target award (unprorated because the performance cycle was complete as of December 31, ~~2016)~~2018) under the performance cash component of our ~~2014~~2016 LTIP and prorated target awards under the performance cash component of our ~~2015~~2017 LTIP and our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP; and


(c)	under ~~"Acceleration~~“Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards,"” the sum of (i) the estimated value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of common stock underlying all RSUs that were ~~not vested~~unvested as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, and (ii) the in-the-money/intrinsic value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of all NQSOs that were ~~not vested~~unvested as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2018.


(5)	Represents the sum of:


(a)	under ~~"Annual~~“Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,"” the amount actually earned under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP; ~~and~~

(b)

(c)

under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the ~~performance cash component~~sum of: (i) the estimated value, as of ~~our 2015 LTIP~~December 31, 2018, of common stock underlying RSUs granted in 2016 that were unvested as of December 31, 2018; and (ii) the in-the-money/intrinsic value, as of December 31, 2018, of NQSOs granted in 2016 ~~LTIP would be paid between January 1 and March 15~~that were unvested as of ~~the calendar year following conclusion of the applicable performance cycle.~~December 31, 2018.


(6)	Represents the sum of:


(a)	under ~~"Annual~~“Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,"” the amount actually earned under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP;

(b)

under ~~"LTIP~~“LTIP Cash,"” the sum of the amount actually earned under the performance cash component of our ~~2014~~2016 LTIP and an estimate of the prorated amount that actually would be earned under the performance cash component of each of our ~~2015~~2017 LTIP and ~~2016~~2018 LTIP ~~(estimated~~[estimated as described in footnote (2) above). The prorated amounts actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP would be paid between January 1 and March 15 of the calendar year following conclusion of the applicable performance cycle;above]; and

(c)

under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the sum ofof: (i) the estimated value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of common stock underlying RSUs granted in 2017 or 2018 that were ~~not vested~~unvested as of December 31, ~~2016~~2018, but were scheduled to vest by December 31, ~~2017, and~~2019; (ii) the in-the-money/ intrinsic value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of NQSOs granted in 2017 that were ~~not vested~~unvested as of December 31, ~~2016~~2018, but were scheduled to vest by December 31, ~~2017.~~2019; (iii) the estimated value, as of December 31, 2018, of common stock underlying RSUs granted in 2016 that were unvested as of December 31, 2018; and (iv) the in-the-money/intrinsic value, as of December 31, 2018, of NQSOs granted in 2016 that were unvested as of December 31, 2018.


(7)	Represents the sum of:


~~(a)~~(1)	under ~~"Annual~~“Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,"” the amount actually earned under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP; and

~~(b)~~(2)

under ~~"LTIP~~“LTIP Cash,"” the sum of the amount actually earned under the performance cash component of our ~~2014~~2016 LTIP and an estimate of the unprorated amount that actually would be earned under the performance cash component of each of our ~~2015~~2017 LTIP and ~~2016~~2018 LTIP ~~(estimated~~[estimated as described in footnote (2) above). The unprorated amounts actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP would be paid between January 1 and March 15 of the calendar year following conclusion of the applicable performance cycle;above]; and



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~


~~(c)~~(3)	under ~~"Acceleration~~“Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards,"” the sum of (i) the estimated value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of common stock underlying all RSUs that were ~~not vested~~unvested as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, and (ii) the in-the-money/intrinsic value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of all NQSOs that were ~~not vested~~unvested as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2018.


(8)	~~Represents the sum of:~~


~~(a)~~	under "Cash Severance," two times the sum of (a) her annual base salary in effect on the date of termination; and (b) her target 2016 SMIP opportunity, with such amount being payable in equal monthly installments over a period of 24 months;


~~(b)~~	under "Annual Incentive for Year of Termination," the amount earned under our 2016 SMIP based on Ms. Streeter's base salary earnings for 2016 and forecasted Company performance as of the end of January 2016. This amount was paid to Ms. Streeter in March 2016;


~~(c)~~	~~under "LTIP~~Under “LTIP Cash," the sum of the amount actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2014 LTIP, 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP, based on forecasted Company performance as of the end of January 2016, and prorated to Ms. Streeter's termination date. This amount was paid to Ms. Streeter in March 2016;

~~(d)~~

under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the sum of (i) the value, as of January 11, 2016, of common stock underlying all cash-settled retention RSUs; (ii) the value, as of January 11, 2016, of common stock underlying stock-settled RSUs scheduled to vest on or before June 30, 2016; and (iii) the in-the-money / intrinsic value, as of January 11, 2016, of all NQSOs scheduled to vest on or before June 30, 2016. Ms. Streeter's cash-settled retention SARs were underwater as of January 11, 2016; and


~~(e)~~	under "Misc. Benefits," the sum of the maximum cost ($75,000) to be incurred by Libbey to provide executive level outplacement services for two years following termination and the estimated cost (net of contributions by Ms. Streeter at the active employee rate) to provide medical, dental, prescription drug and life insurance coverage for 18 months following termination.


~~(9)~~	~~Ms. Buck did not receive any severance payments or benefits in connection with her resignation.~~


~~(10)~~	~~Represents the sum of:~~


~~(a)~~	~~under "Annual Incentive for Year of Termination," the amount actually earned under our 2016 SMIP;~~


~~(b)~~	under "LTIP Cash," a target award (unprorated because the performance cycle was complete as of December 31, 2016) under the performance cash component of our 2014 LTIP and prorated target awards under the performance cash component of our 2015 LTIP and our 2016 LTIP; and


~~(c)~~	under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the sum of (i) the estimated value, as of December 31, 2016, of common stock underlying all RSUs that were not vested as of December 31, 2016, (iii) the in-the-money/ intrinsic value, as of December 31, 2016, of all NQSOs that were not vested as of December 31, 2016.

~~(11)~~

~~Under "LTIP Cash,"~~” represents prorated actual awards under the performance cash component of our ~~2014~~2016 LTIP, ~~2015~~2017 LTIP and ~~2016~~2018 LTIP ~~(estimated~~[estimated as described in footnote (2) ~~above)~~above]. We have prorated the amounts through the assumed date of termination. The prorated amounts actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP would be paid between January 1 and March 15 of the calendar year following conclusion of the applicable performance cycle.


~~(12)~~	~~Represents the sum of:~~

(9) Represents the sum of:


(a)	under ~~"Cash~~“Cash Severance,"” the sum of 12 months' base salary ~~continuation for 12 months~~ and ~~a lump sum payment in an amount equal to~~ the named executive's target ~~annual incentive compensation, based on the annual base salary and target opportunity percentage in effect on the date of termination;~~


~~(b)~~	~~under "Annual Incentive for Year of Termination," the amount actually earned under our 2016 SMIP;~~

~~(c)~~

under "LTIP Cash," prorated actual awards under the performance cash component of our 2014 LTIP, 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP (estimated as described in footnote (2) above). We have prorated the amounts through the assumed date of termination. The prorated amounts actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP would be paid between January 1 and March 15 of the calendar year following conclusion of the applicable performance cycle;

~~(d)~~

under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the sum of (i) the estimated value, as of December 31, 2016, of common stock underlying RSUs that were not yet vested as of December 31, 2016, and were scheduled to vest by December 31, 2017; (ii) the in-the-money / intrinsic value, as of December 31, 2016, of NQSOs that were not yet vested as of December 31, 2016, and were scheduled to vest by December 31, 2017; and


~~(e)~~	under "Misc. Benefits," the sum of (i) the estimated cost (net of contributions by the named executive, at the active employee rate) of continued medical, dental, prescription drug and life insurance coverage for a period of 12 months following termination, and (ii) executive outplacement services for a period of one year from termination at the rate of $75,000 per year.



	~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~


~~(13)~~	~~Represents the sum of:~~


~~(a)~~	~~under "Cash Severance," the sum of two times the named executive's annual base salary and two times the named executive’s target~~ award under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP, at the annual base salary and target incentive opportunity in effect on the date of termination;


(b)	under ~~"Annual~~“Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,"” the amount actually earned under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP;


(c)	under ~~"LTIP~~“LTIP Cash,"” the sum of the amount actually earned under the performance cash component of our ~~2014~~2016 LTIP and prorated actual awards under the performance cash component of each of our 2017 LTIP and our 2018 LTIP [estimated as described in footnote (2) above];

(d)

under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the sum of: (i) the estimated value, as of December 31, 2018, of common stock underlying RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018, but were scheduled to vest by December 31, 2019,; (ii) the in-the-money/ intrinsic value, as of December 31, 2018, of NQSOs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018, but were scheduled to vest by December 31, 2019; and


(e)	under “Misc. Benefits,” the sum of (i) the estimated cost (net of contributions by the named executive at the active employee rate) of continued medical, dental, and prescription drug coverage for 12 months following termination; and (iii) executive outplacement services for a period of one year from termination at the rate of $75,000 per year.


(9)	Represents the sum of:


(a)	under “Cash Severance,” the sum of 6 months' base salary and 50% of Mr. Burmeister's target award under our 2017 SMIP, at the annual base salary and target incentive opportunity in effect on the date of termination;


(b)	under “Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,” the amount actually earned under our 2017 SMIP;


(c)	under “LTIP Cash,” the sum of the amount actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2015 LTIP and prorated actual awards under the performance cash component of each of our 2016 LTIP and our 2017 LTIP [estimated as described in footnote (2) above];

(d)

under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the sum of: (i) the estimated value, as of December 31, 2017, of common stock underlying RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2017, but were scheduled to vest by December 31, 2018,; (ii) the in-the-money/intrinsic value, as of December 31, 2017, of NQSOs that were unvested as of December 31, 2017, but were scheduled to vest by December 31, 2018; and


(e)	under “Misc. Benefits,” the sum of (i) the estimated cost (net of contributions by the named executive at the active employee rate) of continued medical, dental, and prescription drug coverage for six months following termination; and (iii) executive outplacement services for a period of one year from termination at the rate of $75,000 per year.

2019 Proxy Statement 53

Executive Compensation


(10)	Represents the sum of:


(a)	under “Cash Severance,” the sum of two times the named executive’s annual base salary and two times the named executive’s target award under our 2018 SMIP, at the annual base salary and target incentive opportunity in effect on the date of termination;


(b)	under “Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,” the amount actually earned under our 2018 SMIP;

(c)

under “LTIP Cash,” the sum of the amount actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2016 LTIP and an estimate (without proration) of the amount the named executive would earn under the performance cash component of each of our ~~2015~~2017 LTIP and our ~~2016~~2018 LTIP ~~(estimated~~[estimated as described in footnote (2) above). The unprorated amounts actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP would be paid between January 1 and March 15 of the calendar year following conclusion of the applicable performance cycle;above];


(d)	under ~~"Acceleration~~“Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards,"” the estimated value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of common stock underlying RSUs not yet vested as of that date and the ~~in-the-money /~~ in-the-money/intrinsic value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of NQSOs not yet vested as of that date; and

(e)

under ~~"Misc.~~“Misc. Benefits,"” the sum of (i) the maximum cost (15% of base salary) to be incurred by Libbey to provide executive level outplacement services for two years after termination; (ii) the estimated cost (net of contributions by the named executive at the active employee rate) of continued medical, dental, prescription drug and life insurance coverage for 18 months following termination; and (iii) ~~and~~ the maximum cost ($10,000) to provide financial planning services to the named executive.


~~(14)~~(11)	Represents the sum of:


(a)	under ~~"Annual~~“Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,"” the amount actually earned under our ~~2016~~2018 SMIP; and


(b)	under ~~"Misc.~~“Misc. Benefits,"” the present value of Ms. ~~Kovach's~~Kovach’s accumulated benefit under our Salary Plan and SERP at December 31, ~~2016.~~2018.

In addition, if the Compensation Committee were to exercise discretion to accelerate unvested RSUs and NQSOs that were scheduled to vest by December 31, ~~2017,~~2019, we estimate that the value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of the accelerated RSUs would be $111,331, and that the ~~in-the-money /~~ in-the-money/intrinsic value, as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, of the accelerated NQSOs would be $10,286. We estimated these values in the manner described in footnote (3) above.


(12)	Represents the sum of:


(a)	under “Cash Severance,” salary continuation for 12 months and a lump sum payment;


(b)	under “LTIP Cash,” the sum of the amount actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2016 LTIP and prorated actual awards under the performance cash component of our 2017 LTIP [estimated as described in footnote (2) above];

(c)

under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the sum of: (i) the estimated value, as of January 15, 2018, of common stock underlying RSUs that were unvested as of January 15, 2018, but were scheduled to vest by January 15, 2019; (ii) the estimated value, as of January 15, 2018, of common stock underlying 3,000 RSUs that were unvested as of January 15, 2018, but for which the Committee exercised discretion to accelerate vesting; and (iii) the in-the-money/intrinsic value, as of January 15, 2018, of NQSOs that were unvested as of January 15, 2018, but were scheduled to vest by January 15, 2019; and


(d)	under “Misc. Benefits,” the sum of (i) the estimated cost (net of contributions by the named executive at the active employee rate) of continued medical, dental, and prescription drug coverage for 12 months following termination; and (iii) executive outplacement services for a period of one year from termination at the rate of $75,000 per year.


(13)	Represents the sum of:


(a)	under “Cash Severance,” the sum of 6 months' base salary and 50% of Mr. Mossing's target award under our 2018 SMIP, at the annual base salary and target incentive opportunity in effect on the date of termination;


(b)	under “Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,” the amount actually earned under our 2018 SMIP;


(c)	under “LTIP Cash,” the sum of the amount actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2016 LTIP and prorated actual awards under the performance cash component of each of our 2017 LTIP and our 2018 LTIP [estimated as described in footnote (2) above];

(d)

under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the sum of: (i) the estimated value, as of December 31, 2018, of common stock underlying RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018, but were scheduled to vest by December 31, 2019,; (ii) the in-the-money/intrinsic value, as of December 31, 2018, of NQSOs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018, but were scheduled to vest by December 31, 2019; and


(e)	under “Misc. Benefits,” the sum of (i) the estimated cost (net of contributions by the named executive at the active employee rate) of continued medical, dental, and prescription drug coverage for six months following termination; and (iii) and executive outplacement services for a period of one year from termination at the rate of $75,000 per year.


(14)	Represents the sum of:


(a)	under “Cash Severance,” 6 months' base salary;


(b)	under “Annual Incentive for Year of Termination,” the amount actually earned under our 2018 SMIP;


(c)	under “LTIP Cash,” the sum of the amount actually earned under the performance cash component of our 2016 LTIP and prorated actual awards under the performance cash component of each of our 2017 LTIP and our 2018 LTIP [estimated as described in footnote (2) above];


(d)	under "Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards," the sum of: (i) the estimated value, as of December 31, 2018, of common stock underlying RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018, but were scheduled to vest by December 31, 2019; and


(e)	under “Misc. Benefits,” the sum of (i) the estimated cost (net of contributions by the named executive at the active employee rate) of continued medical, dental, and prescription drug coverage for six months following termination; and (iii) and executive outplacement services for a period of six months from termination at the rate of $75,000 per year.

54Libbey Inc.

Executive Compensation



~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~	CEO Pay Ratio

~~Non-Management Directors’ Compensation in 2016~~

~~Our management directors do not receive additional pay for service on~~As required by Section 953(b) of the ~~Board~~Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of ~~Directors. Upon his appointment to CEO on January 12, 2016,~~Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Foley, ~~was no longer entitled to receive any additional compensation for service as~~our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The pay ratio included in this information is a ~~director. He was, however, entitled to receive~~reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

For 2018:

The median of the annual ~~equity award granted to non-management directors at the 2016~~total compensation of all employees of our company worldwide (other than our CEO), was $13,616; and

The annual ~~meeting~~total compensation of ~~shareholders,~~our CEO, as ~~the award is attributable to service for the 2015 fiscal year. The grant date fair value of this award is included~~reported in the Summary Compensation Table ~~above.~~in this Proxy Statement, was $2,778,142.



Based on this information for 2018, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Foley, our CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was:	204	:	1

To calculate the ratio above, we used the same median employee that we had identified as of October 1, 2017. We believe there have been no changes in our employee population or our compensation arrangements in 2018 that would result in a material change in our pay ratio disclosure or our median employee.

To determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO, the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that we used were as follows:

The “median employee” is a full-time, hourly employee located in Mexico. For purposes of translating to U.S. dollars the compensation elements paid in Mexican pesos, we used a year-end average rate comprised of the average month-end rate for the 12 calendar months.

With respect to the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” we identified and calculated the elements of the employee’s compensation for 2018 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K.


•	With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2018 Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement.

For additional information regarding the methodology, material assumptions, adjustments and estimates that we used to identify the "median employee," as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO, see our proxy statement filed March 29, 2018.

The Securities and Exchange Commission rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee's annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

2019 Proxy Statement 55

Stock Ownership Information

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

WHO ARE THE LARGEST OWNERS OF LIBBEY STOCK?

The following table shows information, as of March 20, 2019 unless otherwise indicated, with respect to the persons we know to be beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock. Except as otherwise indicated by footnote, the percentage ownership indicated is based on 22,273,568 outstanding shares of Libbey Inc. common stock as of March 20, 2019.



Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class
Brigade Capital Management, LP⁽¹⁾ 399 Park Avenue, 16th Floor New York, NY 10022	2,410,000	10.8	%
Russell Investments Group, Ltd.⁽²⁾ 1301 Second Avenue Suite 1800 Seattle, WA 98101	2,276,045	10.2	%
Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC.⁽³⁾ 99 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110	2,025,898	9.1	%
Royce & Associates, LP⁽⁴⁾ 745 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10151	1,648,249	7.4	%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP⁽⁵⁾ Building One 6300 Bee Cave Road Austin, TX 78746	1,419,412	6.4	%
Boston Partners⁽⁶⁾ One Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108	1,238,392	5.6	%

(1)

Based solely on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on December 17, 2018, as of December 12, 2018, Brigade Capital Management, LP, Brigade Capital Management GP, LLC, and Donald E. Morgan, III, have shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 2,410,000 shares and Brigade Leveraged Capital Structures Fund Ltd. has shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 2,290,000 shares.

(2)

Based solely on Amendment No. 1 Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 15, 2019, as of February 28, 2019, Russell Investments Group, Ltd., a parent holding company, was the beneficial owner of 2,276,045 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to no such shares, shared dispositive power as to all such shares, sole voting power with respect to all common shares, and shared voting power with respect to no common shares.

(3)

Based solely on Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019, as of December 31, 2018, Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC., an investment adviser, was the beneficial owner of 2,025,898 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to all such shares, shared dispositive power as to no such shares, sole voting power with respect to 901,851 common shares, and shared voting power with respect to no common shares.

(4)

Based solely on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 15, 2019, as of December 31, 2018, Royce & Associates, LP, an investment adviser, was the beneficial owner of 1,648,249 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to all such shares, shared dispositive power as to no such shares, sole voting power with respect to all common shares, and shared voting power with respect to no common shares.

(5)

Based solely on Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 8, 2019, as of December 31, 2018, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, an investment adviser, was the beneficial owner of 1,419,412 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to all such shares, shared dispositive power as to no such shares, sole voting power with respect to 1,342,641 common shares, and shared voting power with respect to no common shares.

(6)

Based solely on Amendment No. 5 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2019, as of December 31, 2018, Boston Partners, an investment adviser, was the beneficial owner of 1,238,392 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to all such shares, shared dispositive power as to no such shares, sole voting power with respect to 272,710 common shares, and shared voting power with respect to no common shares.

56Libbey Inc.

Stock Ownership Information

HOW MUCH LIBBEY STOCK DO OUR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OWN?

STOCK OWNERSHIP/RETENTION GUIDELINES

Non-Management Director Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

We have stock ownership and retention guidelines for our non-management directors. Under the guidelines:

Each non-management director who joined the Board on or before August 1, 2017, must acquire, within five years from the date he or she was first elected to the Board, the number of shares of Libbey common stock determined by dividing $237,500 by the average closing price of Libbey common stock over the one-year period ending July 25, 2017.

Each non-management director who joined the Board after August 1, 2017, must acquire, within five years from the date on which he or she is first elected to the Board, the number of shares of Libbey common stock equal in value to at least five times the annual cash retainer for non-management directors in effect on the date the director is first elected to the Board. For purposes of determining the number of shares of Libbey common stock to be acquired, the cash equivalent value will be divided by the average closing price of Libbey common stock over the one-year period ending on the date of the director's election to the Board.

Until the director acquires the guideline number of shares, he or she must hold 100% of the net after-tax shares of Libbey common stock issued to him or her on the date of each annual shareholders meeting and all other Libbey shares that he or she owns or otherwise acquires.

Once the director has achieved the guideline number of shares, he or she may dispose of Libbey common stock subject, provided that: (a) until retirement, the director must continuously hold at least the guideline number of shares; and (b) shares of Libbey common stock purchased by the director and net after-tax shares issued to the director on the date of each annual shareholders meeting must be held by the director for at least one year from the date on which the director acquired them.

As of March 20, 2019, all of our existing non-management directors ~~receives~~are in compliance with the ~~following compensation~~Director Retention Guidelines.

Executive Stock Retention Guidelines

We have stock retention guidelines for ~~their service~~our executives. Under the guidelines, each executive is generally required to retain, until his or her separation from service:

50% of the net after-tax shares underlying each grant of RSUs made after January 1, 2013, that subsequently vests; and

50% of the net after-tax shares underlying NQSOs granted after January 1, 2013, that the executive subsequently exercises.

Executives nearing retirement are released from our guidelines on the ~~board~~date the Board is notified of the planned retirement, or one year before the contemplated retirement date, whichever is later.

As of March 20, 2019, all applicable named executives were in compliance with the Executive Retention Guidelines.

2019 Proxy Statement 57

Stock Ownership Information

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP TABLE

The following table shows, as of March 20, 2019, the number of shares of our common stock and ~~its committees. For service periods~~percentage of all issued and outstanding shares of our common stock that are beneficially owned by our directors, the named executives and our directors and executive officers as a group. With respect to those named executives who were no longer employed by the Company as of March 20, 2019, the information included in this table is accurate to the best of our knowledge. Our address, as set forth on the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, is the address of each director and named executive set forth below. The shares owned by the named executives set forth below include the shares held in their accounts in our 401(k) plan. An asterisk indicates ownership of less than one ~~year, amounts~~percent of the outstanding stock.



Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class
James C. Burmeister⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	24,133	*
Carlos V. Duno⁽³⁾	49,305	*
William A. Foley^(1)(2)(3)	268,911	1.21	%
Ginger M. Jones⁽³⁾	25,635	*
Susan A. Kovach⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	92,731	*
Eileen A. Mallesch⁽³⁾	22,412	*
Deborah G. Miller⁽³⁾	47,284	*
Salvador Miñarro Villalobos^(1)(2)(4)	39,217	*
Carol B. Moerdyk⁽³⁾	53,842	*
William C. Mossing⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	11,248	*
Steve Nave⁽³⁾	11,940	*
John C. Orr⁽³⁾	42,507	*
Sarah J. Zibbel⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	0	*
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group^(1)(2)(3)(4)	697,395	3.13	%


(1)	Does not include shares of our common stock that have vested but are deferred under our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan ("EDCP"). As of March 20, 2019, each of our named executives, and all executive officers as a group, had the following shares of our common stock that are vested but deferred under our EDCP:



Named Executive		Number of Deferred Shares
W. Foley		0
J. Burmeister		0
S. Kovach		17,720
S. Miñarro		0
W. Mossing		0
S. Zibbel		0
All executive officers as a group		17,720

Does not include the following shares of phantom stock that are ~~prorated.~~held by our named executives and all executive officers as a group pursuant to our EDCP and that are payable in cash:



~~Element of Compensation~~Named Executive		~~Annual Compensation Amount~~Number of Phantom Shares
~~Annual Cash Retainer~~W. Foley		~~$47,500~~0
~~Lead Independent Director Cash Retainer~~J. Burmeister		~~$20,000~~0
~~Equity Award~~S. Kovach		~~On the date of each annual meeting of shareholders, outright grant of shares of common stock valued at $80,000 on the date of grant~~1,014
~~Committee Chair Cash Retainers~~ ~~(in addition to Committee Member Cash Retainers)~~ S. Miñarro		~~$12,500 (Audit Committee and Compensation Committee)~~0
	~~$6,500 (Nominating and Governance Committee)~~
~~Committee Member Cash Retainers~~W. Mossing		~~$7,500 (Audit Committee and Compensation Committee)~~0
~~Committee Member Cash Retainers~~W. Mossing		~~$5,000 (Nominating and Governance Committee)~~
~~Other Fees~~S. Zibbel		~~$500 per one-half day of service~~0
All executive officers as a group		1,014

The Lead Independent Director Cash Retainer replaced the Chairman of the Board Cash Retainer, which was discontinued when we combined the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in January 2016.

~~We also maintain retention guidelines for non-management directors. For more information regarding our stock retention guidelines for non-management directors, see~~ ~~‘‘Stock Ownership — How much Libbey stock do our directors and officers own? — Stock Ownership Guidelines’’~~ ~~below.~~

Pursuant to the Director Deferred Compensation Plan, directors may elect to defer cash and/or equity compensation into any of 13 measurement funds. The Director DCP and the predecessor deferred compensation plans for which non-management directors were eligible are unfunded plans, and the Company does not guarantee an above-market return on amounts deferred under these plans. Amounts deferred under the Director DCP or a predecessor plan are, at the director's election, payable either in a lump sum or in installments over a period of time selected by the director. Amounts deferred under our first deferred compensation plan for outside directors are payable in a lump sum upon the earlier of the director's death or retirement from our Board.

We reimburse our non-management directors for their travel expenses incurred in attending Board or Board committee meetings, and for fees and expenses incurred in attending director education seminars and conferences. The directors do not receive any other personal benefits.


(2)	Includes the following NQSOs that have been granted to our named executives and all executive officers as a group and that currently are exercisable or will be exercisable on or before May 18, 2019:



Named Executive		~~COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS~~Number of Outstanding Stock Options Exercisable Within 60 Days
W. Foley		139,225
J. Burmeister		10,594
S. Kovach		44,348
S. Miñarro		6,000
W. Mossing		7,531
S. Zibbel		0
All executive officers as a group		212,669

58Libbey Inc.

Stock Ownership Information


(3)	Includes the following shares of our common stock that are deferred by non-management directors under our 2009 Director Deferred Compensation Plan, which we refer to as our Director DCP, and that are payable as shares of our common stock:

~~The table below shows~~



Name of Director		Number of Deferred Shares
C. Duno		26,327
W. Foley^(a)		0
G. Jones		0
E. Mallesch		22,412
D. Miller		0
C. Moerdyk		0
S. Nave		11,940
J. Orr		0
All non-management directors as a group		60,679

Does not include the ~~pay received~~following shares of phantom stock that are held by ~~our~~ non-management directors pursuant to our deferred compensation plans for outside directors and that are payable in ~~2016. Compensation received by Mr. Foley in 2016 for his service as a non-management director is included in the~~ ~~Summary Compensation Table~~ ~~above.~~

~~DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016~~cash:

Director
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)⁽¹⁾

Stock Awards
($)⁽²⁾

Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings
($)⁽³⁾

All Other
Compensation
($)

Total
($)
Carlos V. Duno 72,500
80,007
0 0 152,507
Peter C. McC. Howell 16,630
80,007
0 0 96,637
Ginger M. Jones 75,000
80,007
0 0 155,007
Theo Killion 60,421
80,007
0 0 140,428
Eileen A. Mallesch 42,079
0
0 0 42,079
Deborah G. Miller 60,693
80,007
0 0 140,700
Carol B. Moerdyk 60,000
80,007
0 0 140,007
John C. Orr 87,587
80,007
0 0 167,594



Name of Director		Number of Phantom Shares
C. Duno		0
W. Foley^(a)		13,126
G. Jones		0
E. Mallesch		0
D. Miller		2,443
C. Moerdyk		20,566
S. Nave		15,768
J. Orr		0
All non-management directors as a group		51,903


(a)	Mr. Foley was a non-management director from 1994 until he assumed the role of CEO on January 12, 2016.

For more information regarding our deferred compensation plans for non-management directors, see “Non-Management Directors’ Compensation in 2018” above .


(4)	Based on last known information as of date of separation from service. For Mr. Miñarro, that date was January 15, 2018.

In addition to outstanding shares of common stock that our named executives beneficially owned as of March 20, 2019, or, for those no longer employed by the Company as of that date, as of their last date of employment, the named executives and all executive officers as a group have received the following grants of RSUs that have not yet vested:



Named Executive		Number of Unvested RSUs⁽¹⁾
W. Foley		346,994
J. Burmeister		58,845
S. Kovach		47,678
S. Minarro		0
W. Mossing		46,997
S. Zibbel		40,692
All executive officers as a group		559,076

(1)

Of these amounts, 14,963 RSUs with four-year ratable vesting were awarded on January 11, 2016; 1,932 RSUs with four-year ratable vesting were awarded on February 8, 2016; 24,773 RSUs with four-year ratable vesting were awarded on February 13, 2017; 7,008 RSUs with four-year ratable vesting were awarded on March 16, 2017; 11,907 RSUs with four-year ratable vesting were awarded on October 23, 2017; 14,000 RSUs with three-year cliff vesting were awarded on November 5, 2017; 173,797 RSUs with four-year ratable vesting were awarded on February 5, 2018; 14,000 RSUs with four-year ratable vesting were awarded on March 7, 2018; 10,000 RSUs with three-year cliff vesting were awarded on March 7, 2018; 296,534 RSUs with three-year ratable vesting were awarded on February 18, 2019; and 3,692 RSUs with three-year ratable vesting were awarded on March 1, 2019. One share of our common stock will be issued for each vested RSU. Dividends do not accrue on RSUs until they vest. For further information, see “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — What pay did Libbey's executives receive for 2018?”and the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table above.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

All of our directors and executive officers are required to file initial reports of share ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. We have reviewed these reports, including any amendments, and written representations from the executive officers and directors of the Company. Based solely on this review, we believe that all 2018 filing requirements were met for each of our directors and executive officers subject to Section 16(a).

2019 Proxy Statement 59

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Following are the number of securities and weighted average exercise price thereof under our compensation plans approved and not approved by security holders as of December 31, 2018:



Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights⁽¹⁾	Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Rights	Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	1,283,501	16.82	968,232
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	—	—	—
Total	1,283,501	16.82	968,232


(1)	This number includes 692,929 restricted stock units awarded under Libbey's equity compensation plans.

See footnote 1 to the Outstanding Awards as of December 31, 2018, table on page 62 for additional information, as of March 20, 2019, regarding the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options granted under our 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan and 2016 Plan, the weighted average exercise price and weighted average life of outstanding stock options and the number of unvested RSUs outstanding at that date.



PROPOSAL NO. 3
AMENDED AND RESTATED LIBBEY INC. 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
Approval of the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.	þ
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

We currently provide equity-based compensation under the terms of our Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan ("2006 Plan"), which was approved by the shareholders at the 2010 Annual Meeting, and the Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "Existing 2016 Plan"), which was approved by the shareholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting. As of March 20, 2019, only 161,810 and 184,093 shares remained available for grant under the 2006 Plan and Existing 2016 Plan, respectively, with 1,145,640 shares subject to outstanding awards under the 2006 Plan and 668,086 shares subject to outstanding awards under the Existing 2016 Plan. Because we have only 345,903 shares remaining available for grant, our Compensation Committee's ability to provide competitive, performance-based equity compensation that aligns our executives' interests with those of our shareholders is very limited.

We are submitting the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "Amended 2016 Plan") to our shareholders for approval in order to ensure that we have a sufficient number of shares available for issuance in the form of equity awards in the future to attract and retain employees and non-employee directors who are critical to improving the Company's performance, to further align their interests with those of our shareholders, and to closely link executive compensation with our performance. The primary change in the Amended 2016 Plan is to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the plan by 1,750,000 shares. In addition, the Amended 2016 Plan updates the plan for certain tax law changes and modifies certain other provisions as more fully described below under "Modifications to Other Provisions."

Adoption of the Amended 2016 Plan is critical to our success. If the Amended 2016 Plan is not approved, we will not have enough shares to provide equity compensation to our key employees. We do not believe cash awards are a viable alternative to replace the value of equity awards. Compared to equity awards, cash awards do not align executives' interests as closely with those of shareholders. Furthermore, in light of the Company's financial leverage, the Company is focused on using free cash flow to reduce debt, limiting the Company's ability to use cash for retention awards and long-term incentive compensation. Without additional shares, we will be unable to provide market-competitive compensation packages, as a result of which we may be unable to retain and attract the talent we need.

The Amended 2016 Plan will be effective as of the date on which our shareholders approve the Amended 2016 Plan. If the Amended 2016 Plan is not approved by our shareholders, the Amended 2016 Plan will not become effective, the Existing 2016 Plan and the 2006 Plan will continue in full force and effect, and we may continue to grant awards under the Existing 2016 Plan and 2006 Plan, subject to their terms, conditions and limitations, using the shares available for issuance thereunder.

60Libbey Inc.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Increase in Number of Shares

The Amended 2016 Plan will increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the plan by 1,750,000 shares from 1,200,000 shares to 2,950,000 shares. Under the current form of the Existing 2016 Plan, as of March 20, 2019, 184,093 shares remain available for grant. If the Amended 2016 Plan is approved, the maximum number of shares available for future issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan would be 1,934,093. The additional shares will be available for grant over multiple years.

We believe this increase is reasonable and in the Company's best interests for the following reasons:

~~(1)~~1.

~~Includes pay deferred into~~

Additional shares are required for Libbey to make continued equity grants as necessary in order to attract and retain key talent. As of March 20, 2019, only 345,903 shares remained available for future grant under our 2006 Plan and Existing 2016 Plan combined, which is lower than our three-year average annual share utilization of 591,643 shares. Unless the proposed increase is approved, Libbey ~~common stock measurement fund pursuant~~will be unable to make grants to existing high-value employees and executives, directors, and any new executive hires, which will make it difficult for us to retain and attract the ~~Director DCP.~~talent required to successfully execute the Company's strategy and improve the Company's performance.

~~(2)~~2.

~~Represents~~

Additional shares allow Libbey to structure compensation programs that more closely align pay with performance. In order to conserve shares under our incentive plans and manage our burn rate in light of the ~~grant date fair value, determined~~decline in ~~accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718,~~the Company's stock price, the components of ~~awards~~our 2018 and 2019 long-term incentive programs are RSUs and performance cash. With additional shares, the Compensation Committee would have the flexibility to include vehicles such as stock options and/or performance shares in our executive compensation program. If the Amended 2016 Plan is approved, the Compensation Committee intends, beginning in 2020, to modify the mix of ~~stock made~~vehicles in our long-term incentive program to ~~non-management directors~~include performance shares. While this is the Compensation Committee's current intention, the Committee's ultimate decision as to the plan designs for future long-term incentive programs will depend on ~~May 10, 2016. On that date, we awarded certain non-management directors stock having~~ a ~~grant date fair value~~variety of ~~$17.58 per share.~~factors and circumstances as existing at the time each applicable program is adopted.


~~(3)~~3.	The ability to grant equity awards helps Libbey conserve cash. If the Amended 2016 Plan is not approved, we may have to reduce the equity component and increase the cash component of our compensation program, which would increase cash compensation expense and use cash that could be better utilized to reduce debt or reinvest in our business.

Additional shares enable Libbey to act on feedback received from shareholders. During our recent shareholder outreach, several of the shareholders with which we spoke provided feedback regarding the use of equity compensation, including a preference that we use performance equity in addition to, or instead of, performance cash, and a suggestion that we consider granting awards of stock options to attract and motivate key talent. If the Amended 2016 Plan is not approved, we will not have sufficient shares to consider acting upon these or any other shareholder suggestions that require additional share availability.

We ~~do not maintain a pension plan for~~carefully manage our ~~non-management directors.~~equity incentive compensation. We ~~do not guarantee any particular rate of return on any pay deferred pursuant~~recognize that equity compensation awards dilute shareholder equity, so we carefully manage our equity compensation. Although the additional 1,750,000 new shares to be available under the Amended 2016 Plan will increase the potential dilution to shareholders, the Board believes our ~~deferred compensation plans. Dividends on pay deferred into the Libbey Inc. phantom stock or measurement fund under our deferred~~equity compensation plans are well-managed and that our equity compensation practices are competitive and consistent with market practices. As of March 20, 2019, we had 22,273,568 authorized, issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. The following table sets forth, as of March 20, 2019, the number of shares authorized for ~~non-management directors accrue~~future issuance under the 2006 Omnibus Plan and the Amended 2016 Plan, along with the equity dilution represented by the shares available for future awards as a percentage of the common shares outstanding on March 20, 2019:



	Total Shares Available	Equity Dilution: Percent of Basic Common Shares Outstanding
Remaining shares authorized for future awards under the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan	161,810	0.7%
Remaining shares authorized for future awards under the 2016 Plan	184,093	0.8%
Additional shares requested under Amended 2016 Plan	1,750,000	7.9%
Total shares authorized for future awards after approval of Amended 2016 Plan	2,095,903	9.4%

On March 25, 2019, Mr. Bauer received two equity grants in connection with his appointment as CEO: (1) under our 2019 LTIP, a grant of 116,827 RSUs with three-year ratable vesting; and (2) to induce Mr. Bauer to join the Company and to establish an immediate and meaningful link to Libbey's long-term stock performance, a new-hire grant of 150,000 non-qualified stock options that cliff vest on March 25, 2022, and are divided into four groups of 37,500 options each, with one group having an exercise price of $7.00, one group having an exercise price of $8.50, one group having an exercise price of $10.00, and one group having an exercise price of $11.50.

2019 Proxy Statement 61

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table shows our equity overhang as of March 20, 2019 (before the grants to Mr. Bauer), and March 25, 2019 (after the grants to Mr. Bauer). Equity overhang is the percentage of outstanding shares represented by all outstanding stock options and RSUs plus those available for future awards pursuant to the Amended 2016 Plan and the 2006 Omnibus Plan.



	As of March 20, 2019 (Before CEO Grants)	As of March 25, 2019 (After CEO Grants)
Outstanding stock options and RSUs + shares available for future awards	3,909,629	4,176,456
Common shares outstanding	22,273,568	22,273,568
Equity overhang	17.6%	18.8%

Actual future equity dilution will be impacted by the following factors:

The number and type of awards that actually are granted under the Amended 2016 Plan;

To the extent that awards of performance shares or performance units are granted in the future, the number of performance shares or performance units that actually are earned or paid out; and

The extent to which the Company conducts share buybacks, which mitigate equity dilution.

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding stock options and RSUs as of December 31, 2018:



Outstanding Awards as of December 31, 2018⁽¹⁾
Stock Options				Unvested RSUs
Range of Exercise Prices	# Outstanding	Weighted-Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Life	Unvested RSUs
$6.75 - $9.38	79,256	7.75	8.7
$10.13 - $19.02	400,389	16.10	6.6
$21.53 - $28.96	95,151	23.89	5.0
$38.06	15,776	38.06	6.2
Total	590,572
				692,929

⁽¹⁾As of March 20, 2019, the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options granted under our 2006 Plan and our 2016 Plan was 590,572, as to which the weighted average exercise price was $16.82 and the weighted average life was 6.4 years. As of March 20, 2019, there were 1,148,483 unvested RSUs outstanding.

The burn rate is generally calculated as all stock options and full value awards granted in a fiscal year divided by the common shares outstanding at the end of the fiscal year. The following table sets forth information regarding awards of stock options and full value awards granted, the burn rate for each of the last three fiscal years, and the average burn rate over the last three years:



		FY 2018		FY 2017		FY 2016		3-Year Average
(A)	Stock options granted	0		249,392		351,590		200,327
(B)	Full value awards granted	596,688		278,351		298,909		391,316
(C)	Common shares outstanding at fiscal year end	22,157,220		22,018,010		21,864,541		22,013,257
Burn Rate [(A)+(B))/(C)]		2.7	%	2.4	%	3.0	%	2.7	%


6.	The Amended 2016 Plan incorporates best practices. The Amended 2016 Plan reflects equity plan best practices including:

No repricing or buyouts: The Amended 2016 Plan prohibits repricing of stock options or SARs and prohibits buyouts of underwater stock options or SARs.

No discounted stock options or SARs: The Amended 2016 Plan prohibits discounted stock options or SARs except for those issued in substitution of outstanding awards in the context of mergers and acquisitions.

No reloads:The Amended 2016 Plan prohibits the automatic reload of stock options.

No liberal share counting: Under the Amended 2016 Plan, the following constitute delivered shares, will not be available for future Awards under the Amended 2016 Plan and will continue to be counted as outstanding for purposes of determining whether award limits have been reached:


◦	shares that are withheld from an award or separately surrendered by the participant in payment of the exercise price or in payment of taxes relating to the award; and


◦	shares that are not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding stock option or SAR.

Minimum 1-year vesting: Except with respect to a maximum of 5% of the shares authorized for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan, full-value awards that vest based on continued employment with or service to the Company may vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date on which the awards are approved, and any full-value awards that vest based on attainment of performance goals must provide for a performance period of at least 12 months. Awards of

62Libbey Inc.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

stock options and SARs that vest on the basis of continued employment may vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date on which the awards are approved.

Double trigger change in control vesting: If replacement awards are granted to participants in connection with a change in control, vesting of the stock options and/or SARs that they replace and that vest based on continued service generally will not be accelerated solely as a result of the change in control. Awards that are based on achievement of performance measures generally will be prorated as of the date of the change in control and deemed earned if and to the extent the performance goals actually are met as of that date unless the extent to which the performance goals actually are achieved as of that date cannot reasonably be determined by the Compensation Committee. In that case, the awards will be prorated and deemed earned at target.

Administered by an independent committee: Each member of the Compensation Committee is "independent," as defined under NYSE American exchange rules and each is an "outside director," as defined in 26 CFR §1.162-27.

No dividend equivalents on stock options or SARs: No dividend equivalents may be granted on awards of options or SARs.

Restrictions on payment of dividends and dividend equivalents:Dividend equivalents may be granted on awards of performance shares and performance units, but they will be held in escrow or deemed reinvested in additional performance shares or performance units until the performance goals are achieved and will be paid only to the extent the underlying performance shares or performance units actually are earned. Dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to any award that is subject to vesting conditions or restrictions will be deferred and held in escrow or deemed reinvested in additional shares until all vesting conditions or restrictions relating to the award (or portion of the award to which the dividend or dividend equivalent relates) have been satisfied and will be forfeited if and to the extent the vesting conditions or restrictions are not satisfied.

Awards subject to clawback / forfeiture: Awards under the Amended 2016 Plan are subject to forfeiture and clawback under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as amended, and under any clawback policy that we may have in place at any time.

In light of the factors described above, our Board of Directors has determined that the size of the share reserve under the Amended 2016 Plan is reasonable and appropriate at this time.

Modifications to Other Provisions

The Amended 2016 Plan makes certain changes to the Existing 2016 Plan intended to reflect compensation and governance best practices or to conform the plan to our current practices as follows:



Existing 2016 Plan		Amended 2016 Plan
Prohibits dividend Equivalents on stock options or SARs; provides that dividend Equivalents granted on performance units and/or performance shares will be deferred and held in escrow or deemed reinvested in additional performance Units and/or performance Shares until achievement of the underlying performance goals and will be paid only to the extent that the underlying performance units and/or performance shares are actually earned		Same as Existing 2016 Plan, but also provides that dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to any award that is subject to vesting conditions or restrictions will be deferred and held in escrow or deemed reinvested in additional shares until all vesting conditions or restrictions relating to the award (or portion of the award to which the dividend or dividend equivalent relates) have been satisfied and will be forfeited if and to the extent ~~payable~~the vesting conditions or restrictions are not satisfied
Maximum number of shares that may be granted to ~~holders~~non-employee directors collectively in any year is 150,000 shares		Increases maximum to 200,000 shares
Except with respect to a maximum of ~~our common stock. Pay deferred into interest-bearing accounts~~5% of the shares authorized for issuance under ~~our deferred compensation plans for non-management directors does not earn an above-market return, as~~ the ~~applicable interest rate is~~plan, full value awards that vest on the yield on ten-year treasuries. Pay deferred into other measurement funds under our deferred compensation plans for non-management directors does not earn an above-market return as that pay earns a return only if andbasis of the participant's continued employment with or service to the ~~extent that~~Company may not vest more rapidly than pro-rata over a three-year period, with the ~~net asset value~~first vesting date occurring no earlier than the first anniversary of the ~~measurement fund into~~date on which the ~~pay~~award is ~~deemed invested actually increases.~~approved		Except with respect to a maximum of 5% of the shares authorized for issuance under the plan, full value awards that vest on the basis of the Participant's continued employment with or service to the Company may not vest before the first anniversary of the date on which the award is approved
Contained provisions that were required for awards to qualify as "performance-based" compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.		The qualified performance-based compensation exception of Section 162(m) of the Code was repealed as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. We have removed certain provisions that were otherwise required for awards to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) prior to its repeal. Despite removing certain 162(m) provisions, the Amended 2016 Plan retains the same individual annual award limits that were in effect under the Existing 2016 Plan. These limits are described in further detail below under "Key Features of the Amended 2016 Plan - Individual Award Limits."

2019 Proxy Statement 63

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Key Features of the Amended 2016 Plan

Key Features of the Amended 2016 Plan are summarized below. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amended 2016 Plan itself set forth in Appendix B.

Plan Administrator: Compensation Committee

Award Types: Stock options (both nonqualified and incentive stock options), stock appreciation rights, which we refer to as SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units, which we refer to as RSUs, performance shares, performance units, cash-based awards and other stock-based awards.

Effective Date: May 15, 2019, if approved by our shareholders

Plan Term: 10 years from the Effective Date

Eligible Participants: Employees of the Company and its affiliates and non-employee members of the Board of Directors. On March 20, 2019, the closing price of our common stock was $3.11 per share, there were six executive officers, seven non-employee directors and approximately 6,000 employees of the Company and its subsidiaries who were eligible to participate in the Amended 2016 Plan.

Total Shares Authorized / Available: The shares of our common stock available under the Amended 2016 Plan may be either previously authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.

Individual Award Limits:



~~AUDIT- RELATED MATTERS~~Award Type		Annual Limit per Participant
Options		500,000 Shares
SARs		500,000 Shares
Restricted Stock or RSUs		500,000 Shares
Performance Units or Performance Shares		500,000 Shares, or equal to the value of 500,000 Shares as determined as of the date of payout
Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards		the value of $5,000,000 or 500,000 Shares determined as of the date of payout
Awards to Non-Employee Directors		20,000 Shares

The foregoing limits may be adjusted for changes in our capitalization and certain corporate transactions, as described below under the headings "Share Counting" and "Adjustments."

Stock Option Exercise Period: Determined by the Compensation Committee, but no more than ten years from the grant date

Stock Option Exercise Price: Equal to or greater than the fair market value on the grant date, defined generally as the closing stock price on the grant date

Summary of Principal Terms of the Amended 2016 Plan

The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amended 2016 Plan itself, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B.

Administration. The Amended 2016 Plan is generally administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board, or any subcommittee thereof, although the full Board of Directors may function as the Compensation Committee. The Committee is authorized to determine (a) the individuals, who we refer to as Participants, who will receive Awards, (b) when they will receive Awards, (c) the number of shares to be subject to each Award, (d) the price of the Awards granted, (e) payment terms, (f) payment method and (g) the expiration date applicable to each Award. The Committee is also authorized to accelerate the vesting of Awards and to adopt, amend and rescind rules relating to the administration of the Amended 2016 Plan. From time to time the Committee may delegate its authority to grant or amend awards to Libbey’s officers, but the delegation must set forth the total number of Awards the officer may grant, and the officer must report periodically to the Committee regarding the nature and scope of the Awards granted. The Committee may not, however, delegate to senior executives of the Company who are subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, authority to grant to, or to amend awards previously granted to, any individual who is subject to Section 162(m) of the Code.

Amendment and Termination. The Committee may at any time amend, modify, suspend or terminate the Amended 2016 Plan or any Award made under the 2016 Omnibus Plan, but the Committee may not, without shareholder approval except as described below under "Adjustments," (a) reprice, replace or regrant, through cancellation and substitution of another Award, options or SARs, (b) lower the option price or grant price of an option or SAR or (c) exchange for cash underwater options or SARs. If shareholder approval for any amendment to the Amended 2016 Plan is required by law, regulation or stock exchange rule, then neither the Committee nor Libbey is authorized to amend the Amended 2016 Plan without shareholder approval. However, the Board of Directors may amend the Amended 2016 Plan or an Award to comply with law and administrative regulations.

64Libbey Inc.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Eligibility. Awards under the Amended 2016 Plan may be granted to our employees or employees of any of our present or future subsidiaries, and to any directors who are not our employees. More than one Award may be granted to an employee or to a non-employee director. All employees and non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the Amended 2016 Plan, although we generally limit awards to a group of approximately 75 employees and our non-employee directors.

Vesting. Except with respect to a maximum of 5% of the shares authorized for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan, and subject to the Compensation Committee's administrative authority described above, any full-value Awards that vest on the basis of the Participant’s continued employment with or service to the Company may vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date on which such Awards are approved, and any full-value Awards that vest upon the attainment of performance goals shall provide for a performance period of at least 12 months. Awards of SARs and/or stock options that vest on the basis of the Participant’s continued employment with or service to the Company may vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date on which such Awards are approved.

Awards. Each Award will be set forth in a separate agreement with the person receiving the Award and will indicate the type, terms and conditions of the Award. The following briefly describes the characteristics of each type of Award that may be made under the Amended 2016 Plan.

Stock Options. Stock options granted under the Amended 2016 Plan may be either “non-qualified” or “incentive” stock options. Non-qualified stock options are options not intended to receive the favorable tax treatment for participants applicable to incentive stock options under the Code. At the time of grant, the Committee will establish the provisions of each stock option, including:


◦	the exercise price (which cannot be less than fair market value),


◦	whether it is a non-qualified or incentive stock option,


◦	the terms and conditions for exercise of the option; and


◦	the duration of the option, although, except for nonqualified options granted to Participants who are not U.S. residents, no option will be exercisable more than 10 years after the date of grant.

However, there are certain requirements under the Code that apply to incentive stock options, including requirements that incentive stock options: (1) must have an exercise price per share of stock of not less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant; (2) may only be granted to employees; and (3) may not have a term longer than ten years after the date of grant. In the case of an incentive stock option granted to an individual who owns, or is deemed to own, at least 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock, the exercise price must be at least 110% of the fair market value of the stock underlying the subject options on the date of grant, and the incentive stock option must expire no later than the fifth anniversary of the date of its grant.

The exercise price for options, together with any applicable tax required to be withheld, must be paid in full at the time of exercise:


◦	by cash or cash equivalents,


◦	by shares previously owned by the participant valued at fair market value on the date of exercise,


◦	by a broker-assisted cashless exercise procedure,


◦	by a combination of any of the above methods, or


◦	by any other method approved or accepted by the Committee.

Stock Appreciation Rights. SARs granted by the Committee will provide for payments to the holder based upon increases in the price of our common stock over a set base price. Payment for SARs may be made in cash or shares or in a combination of cash and shares, as determined by the Committee at the time of grant. A SAR may be granted either in conjunction with an option or independently. At the time of grant, the Committee will establish the provisions of each SAR, including:


◦	the base price (which cannot be less than fair market value),


◦	the terms and conditions for exercise of the SAR; and


◦	the duration of the SAR, although, except for SARS granted to Participants who are not U.S. residents, no SAR will be exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant.

Otherwise, the Amended 2016 Plan does not impose any restriction on the exercise of SARs or the amount of gain that can be realized. However, the Committee may restrict the shares received upon exercise of a SAR.

Restricted Stock. Restricted stock is the grant of shares that are nontransferable and may be subject to substantial risk of forfeiture until specific conditions are met. During the period of restriction, Participants holding shares of restricted stock may have full voting and dividend rights with respect to the shares. The restrictions on the restricted stock will lapse based upon conditions determined by the Committee at the time of grant. The restrictions can be time- or performance-based, including based on the performance criteria described in “Performance Units/ Performance Shares” below.

RSUs. RSUs give the Participant the right to receive shares at some designated time in the future, subject to the satisfaction of conditions determined by the Committee at the time of grant. The conditions can be time- or performance-based, including based on the performance criteria described in “Performance Units/ Performance Shares” below.

2019 Proxy Statement 65

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Performance Units/ Performance Shares. Performance Units give the Participant the right to receive an amount designated as a “unit” at the end of a specified performance period, provided that specified performance goals are satisfied. Performance Shares give the Participant the right to receive shares or cash based on the value of shares of our common stock at the end of a specified performance period, provided that specified performance goals are satisfied. The performance periods and performance goals are determined by the Committee at the time of grant.

Other Cash-Based and Other Stock-Based Awards. From time to time, the Committee may grant Awards denominated in cash or other types of equity-based or equity-related awards that are not otherwise described above. Awards may be designed to comply with or take advantage of applicable local laws of jurisdictions other than the U.S. These other Awards will have such terms as the Committee determines at the time and may include payment upon meeting performance goals.

Non-employee Director Awards. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors may establish the amount and types of Awards that may be granted to our non-employee directors on a periodic and nondiscriminatory basis, as well as any additional amounts based upon:


◦	The number of committees of the Board on which a director serves,


◦	Service as chair of a committee of the Board,


◦	Service as Chair of the Board, and


◦	First election or appointment to the Board.

The terms of the Awards shall be set by the Nominating and Governance Committee, but cannot otherwise be inconsistent with the terms of the Amended 2016 Plan.

Dividends and Dividend Equivalents. Dividend equivalents give the participant the right to receive dividends on stock subject to another type of Award, or, if the grant is independent of another Award, on a number of shares set by the Committee at the time of the grant of the dividend equivalent. A dividend equivalent may be payable at the same time dividends are otherwise payable on the shares or at the time the shares subject to a corresponding Award are otherwise deliverable, if later. No dividend equivalents may be granted with respect to Awards of Options or SARs. Dividend equivalents that are granted with respect to performance shares or performance units will be deemed placed in escrow or reinvested in performance shares or performance units until actually earned. Dividend equivalents payable with respect to performance shares or performance units will be paid only to the extent the performance shares or performance units underlying them actually are earned. Dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to shares underlying any Award that is subject to vesting conditions or restrictions shall be deferred and held in escrow or deemed reinvested in additional shares until all vesting conditions or restrictions relating to the Award (or portion of the Award to which the dividend or dividend equivalent relates) have been satisfied and shall be forfeited if and to the extent the vesting conditions or restrictions are not satisfied.

Share Counting. Under the Amended 2016 Plan, awards that are to be paid in cash pursuant to their terms will not be counted against the shares available for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan. In addition, if an award is settled in cash, the number of shares of common stock on which the award is based will not count toward any limit on the number of shares that may be awarded to an individual, but will be counted against the annual award limit for cash-based awards.

To the extent an Award granted under the Amended 2016 Plan is canceled, expired, forfeited, surrendered, settled in cash or otherwise terminated without delivery of the shares, the shares of common stock retained by or returned to the Company will:

not be deemed to have been delivered under the Amended 2016 Plan;

be available for future Awards under the Amended 2016 Plan; and

increase the share reserve by one share for each share that is retained by or returned to the Company.

However, the following will constitute delivered shares, will not be available for future Awards under the Amended 2016 Plan and will continue to be counted as outstanding for purposes of determining whether award limits have been reached:

shares that are withheld from an Award or separately surrendered by the participant in payment of the exercise or purchase price or in payment of taxes relating to the Award; and

shares that are not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding stock option or SAR.

Awards that are assumed or substituted for in a merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock or reorganization will not be counted against the shares available for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan.

Change in Control. All options and SARs will become fully vested and exercisable, and all other Awards that are not then vested but vest based solely upon continued service to or employment with Libbey, will become vested and payable in full upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the Amended 2016 Plan), unless the Participant is provided with a replacement award that relates to a publicly traded security with a value and terms and conditions that are at least equal to the value of the Award being replaced. In connection with any change in control, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may (1) provide for the cancellation or termination of any Award in exchange for a cash payment (or delivery of shares of stock, other securities or a combination of stock or other securities equivalent to the cash payment), or (2) provide that the time period in which a Participant may exercise options or SARs shall be extended, but not beyond the original expiration date.

Adjustments. In the event of a corporate event or transaction, including merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, separation, partial or complete liquidation, stock split, stock dividend, reverse stock split, split up, spin-off or other distribution of stock or property, combination of shares, exchange of shares or other similar change in capital structure, the Compensation

66Libbey Inc.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Committee may, in its discretion, adjust the number and kind of shares granted under the Amended 2016 Plan, the number and kind of shares subject to Awards, the exercise or grant price of outstanding stock options or SARs, the annual award limts, and other value determinations applicable to outstanding Awards.

Miscellaneous Provisions. Generally, no Award granted under the Amended 2016 Plan may be sold, pledged, assigned or transferred in any manner other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, unless and until the Award has been exercised, or the shares underlying the Award have been issued, and all restrictions applicable to the shares have lapsed. The Committee may allow Awards other than incentive stock options to be transferred without value subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may prescribe.

We may deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit, in order to satisfy federal, state and local withholding taxes, domestic or foreign, the maximum amount that U.S. generally accepted accounting principles permit us to deduct or withhold while still qualifying the Awards for equity accounting. A Participant may elect irrevocably to satisfy his or her withholding requirement by having us withhold shares otherwise deliverable under the Award. The number of shares to be withheld must have a fair market value equal to the tax required to be withheld.

The Committee may specify in the Award that a Participant will forfeit the Award, or any previously delivered shares, due to termination for cause or for violation of our material policies or any noncompete, confidentially or other restrictive covenants by which the Participant is bound. The issuance of shares pursuant to an Award will be subject to compliance with all laws, rules and regulations of any governmental agency or securities exchange.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The tax consequences of the Amended 2016 Plan under current U.S. federal law are summarized in the following discussion. This discussion is limited to the general tax principles applicable to the Amended 2016 Plan, and is intended for general information only. State and local income taxes, as well as foreign income taxes, are not discussed. Tax laws are complex and subject to change and may vary depending on individual circumstances and from locality to locality. The tax information summarized is not tax advice.

Nonqualified Stock Options. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, an optionee generally will not recognize taxable income at the time a non-qualified stock option is granted under the Amended 2016 Plan. Upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option, the optionee will recognize ordinary income, and we generally will be entitled to a deduction. The amount of income recognized (and the amount deductible by Libbey) generally will be equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the aggregate exercise price paid for the shares, regardless of whether the exercise price is paid in cash or in shares or other property. An optionee’s basis for the stock for purposes of determining his or her gain or loss upon a subsequent disposition of the shares generally will be the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise of the non-qualified stock option, and any subsequent gain or loss generally will be taxable as capital gain or loss.

Incentive Stock Options. An optionee generally will not recognize taxable income either at the time an incentive stock option is granted or when it is exercised. However, the amount by which the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise exceeds the exercise price will be an “item of tax preference” to the optionee for purposes of alternative minimum tax. Generally, upon the sale or other taxable disposition of the shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option, the optionee will recognize taxable income. If shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are held for the longer of two years from the date of grant or one year from the date of exercise, the gain or loss (in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value on the date of sale and the exercise price) upon disposition will be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss, and we will not be entitled to any deduction. If this holding period is not met and the stock is sold for a gain, then the difference between the option price and the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise will be taxed as ordinary income, and any gain over that will be eligible for long- or short-term capital gain treatment. If the holding period is not met and the shares are disposed of for less than the fair market value on the date of exercise, then the amount of ordinary income is limited to the excess, if any, of the amount realized over the exercise price paid. We generally will be entitled to a deduction in the amount of any ordinary income recognized by the optionee.

Stock Appreciation Rights. No taxable income is generally recognized upon the receipt of a SAR. Upon exercise of a SAR, the cash or the fair market value of the shares received generally will be taxable as ordinary income in the year of such exercise. Libbey generally will be entitled to a compensation deduction for the same amount that the recipient recognizes as ordinary income.

Restricted Stock. A Participant to whom restricted stock is issued generally will not recognize taxable income upon the issuance of the restricted stock, and we generally will not then be entitled to a deduction, unless the Participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code. However, when restrictions on shares of restricted stock lapse and the shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the Participant generally will recognize ordinary income, and we generally will be entitled to a deduction for an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the date the restrictions lapse over the purchase price of the shares. If the Participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code, then the Participant generally will recognize ordinary income at the date of issuance equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares at that date over the purchase price for the shares, and we will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount.

Restricted Stock Unit. A Participant will generally not recognize taxable income upon the grant of an RSU. However, when the shares are delivered to the Participant, the value of the shares at that time will be taxable to the Participant as ordinary income. Generally, Libbey will be entitled to a deduction for an amount equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the Participant.

Performance Unit/ Performance Shares. A Participant who has been granted an Award of performance units or performance stock generally will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant, and Libbey will not be entitled to a deduction at that time. When an

2019 Proxy Statement 67

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Award is paid, whether in cash or shares, the Participant generally will recognize ordinary income, and Libbey will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

Plan Benefits

The number of Awards that an employee may receive under the Amended 2016 Plan is in the discretion of the Committee and therefore generally cannot be determined in advance. However, awards made to our non-management directors on the date of our 2019 Annual Meeting of shareholders will be made from the Amended 2016 Plan. Accordingly, the following table sets forth awards to be made to our non-employee directors on May 15, 2019:

NEW PLAN BENEFITS



AMENDED AND RESTATED LIBBEY INC. 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
Name and Position	Dollar Value ($)	Number of Shares (#)⁽¹⁾
Carlos V. Duno, Director	90,000	13,846
Ginger M. Jones, Director	90,000	13,846
Eileen A. Mallesch, Director	90,000	13,846
Deborah G. Miller, Director	90,000	13,846
Carol B. Moerdyk, Director	90,000	13,846
Steve Nave, Director	90,000	13,846
John C. Orr, Director	90,000	13,846
All non-employee directors as a group	630,000	96,922

⁽¹⁾ The number of shares is determined by dividing the dollar value by $6.50, the average closing price of our common stock over the fourth quarter of 2018.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR

approval of the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

68Libbey Inc.

Audit-Related Matters

AUDIT-RELATED MATTERS



PROPOSAL NO. 4 —
RATIFICATION OF AUDITORS
The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent auditors for our 2019 fiscal year. Although ratification by the shareholders is not required by law, the Board of Directors believes that you should be given the opportunity to express your views on the subject. Unless otherwise directed, proxies will be voted for ratification.	þ
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal.	þ

The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent auditors for our 2017 fiscal year. Although ratification by the shareholders is not required by law, the Board of Directors believes that you should be given the opportunity to express your views on the subject. Unless otherwise directed, proxies will be voted for ratification.

~~The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal.~~

~~Who are Libbey’s auditors?~~WHAT FEES DID LIBBEY PAY TO ITS AUDITORS FOR FISCAL 2018 AND 2017?

For ~~our 2016 fiscal year,~~the years ended December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017, Deloitte & Touche LLP served as the ~~Company's independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent auditors for our 2017 fiscal year.~~

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire. The representatives will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

~~What fees did Libbey pay to its auditors for Fiscal 2016 and 2015?~~

~~For the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016, Deloitte & Touche LLP served as the Company's~~Company’s external auditors. Fees for services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2018, and December 31, ~~2015~~2017, are as follows:

Nature of Fees 2016 Fees 2015 Fees
Audit Fees⁽¹⁾
$ 1,116,444
$ 1,112,248
Audit-Related Fees⁽²⁾
112,840
115,200
Tax Fees⁽³⁾
0
33,900
All Other Fees 0
0
Total $ 1,229,284
$ 1,261,348



Nature of Fees	2018 Fees ($)	2017 Fees ($)
Audit Fees⁽¹⁾	1,163,145	1,078,000
Audit-Related Fees⁽²⁾	99,586	125,500
Tax Fees	0	0
All Other Fees	0	0
Total	1,262,731	1,203,500


(1)	Audit Fees include fees associated with the annual audit of our internal controls, the annual audit of financial statements, the reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual report on Form 10-K and statutory audit procedures.


(2)	Audit-related fees include fees for audits of our employee benefit plans. The 2015 fees represent payments for the audits of our employee benefit plans for the year ended December 31, 2014, which were performed by Ernst & Young LLP. The 2016 fees represent payments for the audits of our employee benefit plans for the year ended December 31, 2015, which were performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP.


~~(3)~~	Tax fees are for analysis that was performed in 2015 on new U.S. tangible property regulations and was contracted and started in 2014, prior to the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered accounting firm.

WHAT ARE LIBBEY'S PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES?

All audit-related, tax and other services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of these services by Deloitte & Touche LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its audit functions. The Audit Committee’s policy regarding auditor independence requires pre-approval by the Audit Committee of audit, audit-related and tax services on an annual basis. The policy requires that engagements that the auditors or management anticipates will exceed pre-established thresholds must be separately approved. The policy also provides that the Committee will authorize one of its members to pre-approve certain services. The Committee appointed Ginger Jones, Chair of the Committee, to pre-approve these services.

For our 2018 fiscal year, Deloitte & Touche LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent auditors for our 2019 fiscal year.

2019 Proxy Statement 69

Audit-Related Matters



		~~AUDIT- RELATED MATTERS~~

Report of the Audit Committee

The following Report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by Libbey under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent Libbey specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of our financial statements on behalf of the Board of Directors; the adequacy of our systems of internal controls; our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the qualifications and independence of our independent auditors; and the performance of our independent auditors and of our internal audit function.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has direct responsibility for, among other things:

confirming the independence of our independent auditors;

appointing, compensating and retaining our independent auditors;

reviewing the scope of the audit services to be provided by our independent auditors, including the adequacy of staffing and compensation;

approving non-audit services;

overseeing management’s relationship with our independent auditors;

overseeing management’s implementation and maintenance of effective systems of internal and disclosure controls;

reviewing our internal audit program; and

together with the Board and its other standing committees, overseeing our enterprise risk management program.

The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management and the independent auditors all annual and quarterly financial statements before their issuance. The Audit Committee’s discussions with management and the independent auditors include a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

With respect to the audited financial statements for the ~~year ended~~year-ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, the Audit Committee met both with management and with the independent auditors who are responsible for auditing the financial statements prepared by management and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Audit Committee also met with each of the independent auditors and the internal auditors without management being present. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors and management the results of the independent auditors’ examinations; their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles; the adequacy and effectiveness of our accounting and financial internal controls; the reasonableness of significant judgments; the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements; and such other matters as are required to be communicated to the Audit Committee under Statement on Auditing Standards Standard No. 61, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. The independent auditors provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent ~~auditors'~~auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors their independence.

Taking all of these reviews and discussions into account, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



	~~Ginger M. Jones, Chair~~
	~~Theo Killion~~
	~~Eileen A. Mallesch~~
	~~Deborah G. Miller~~
	~~John C. Orr~~

Ginger M. Jones, Chair

~~STOCK OWNERSHIP~~Eileen A. Mallesch

Deborah G. Miller

John C. Orr

70Libbey Inc.

Questions and Answers About the Meeting

~~STOCK OWNERSHIP~~QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT
THE MEETING

~~Who are~~WHO MAY VOTE?

You may vote if you were a holder of the ~~largest owners~~common stock of Libbey ~~stock?~~Inc. at the close of business on March 20, 2019.

The following table shows information with respect to the persons we know to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock as of December 31, 2016, based solely on filings made by such beneficial owners with the SEC:

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of Class
Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC.⁽¹⁾

99 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02110 2,164,994 9.9%

RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc.⁽²⁾

50 South Sixth Street, Suite 2350
Minneapolis, MN 55402 1,889,001 8.6%

BlackRock, Inc.⁽³⁾

55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055 1,292,374 5.9%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP⁽⁴⁾

Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746 1,228,844 5.6%

Boston Partners⁽⁵⁾

One Beacon Street
Boston, MA 02108 1,195,143 5.5%

The Vanguard Group⁽⁶⁾

100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355 1,103,770 5.1%

~~(1)~~

Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC. ("Frontier"), an investment adviser, indicates that, as of December 31, 2016, Frontier was the beneficial owner of 2,164,994 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to all of such shares, shared dispositive power as to none of such shares, sole voting power as to 758,964 common shares, and shared voting power with respect to no common shares.

~~(2)~~

Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc. (‘‘RBC’’), an investment adviser, indicates that, as of December 31, 2016, RBC was the beneficial owner of 1,889,001 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to none of such shares, shared dispositive power as to all of such shares, sole voting power with respect to no common shares, and shared voting power with respect to 1,650,102 common shares.

~~(3)~~

Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of BlackRock, Inc. ("BlackRock"), a parent holding company, indicates that, as of December 31, 2016, BlackRock was the beneficial owner of 1,292,374 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to all of such shares, shared dispositive power as to none of such shares, sole voting power with respect to 1,241,664 common shares, and shared voting power with respect to no common shares.

~~(4)~~

Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP ("Dimensional"), an investment adviser, indicates that, as of December 31, 2016, Dimensional was the beneficial owner of 1,228,884 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to all of such shares, shared dispositive power as to none of such shares, sole voting power with respect to 1,170,018 common shares, and shared voting power with respect to no common shares.

~~(5)~~

Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of Boston Partners ("Boston"), an investment adviser, indicates that, as of December 31, 2016, Boston was the beneficial owner of 1,195,143 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to all of such shares, shared dispositive power as to none of such shares, sole voting power with respect to 704,280 common shares, and shared voting power with respect to no common shares.

~~(6)~~

Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of The Vanguard Group ("Vanguard"), an investment adviser, indicates that, as of December 31, 2016, Vanguard was the beneficial owner of 1,103,770 common shares, with sole dispositive power as to 1,075,574 of such shares, shared dispositive power as to 28,196 of such shares, sole voting power with respect to 27,994 common shares and shared voting power with respect to 1,700 common shares.



	~~STOCK OWNERSHIP~~

~~How much Libbey stock do our directors and officers own?~~

~~Stock Ownership / Retention Guidelines~~

~~Non-Management Director Retention Guidelines~~. In late 2015, we transitioned our non-management director stock ownership guidelines to stock retention guidelines in order to provide greater parity between long-time non-management directors and our newer non-management directors, to further align our non-management directors' interests with thoseA complete list of shareholders ~~and~~entitled to ~~further promote our commitment to sound corporate governance. Under our Director Retention Guidelines, each non-management director is generally required to retain, until~~vote at the ~~first to occur~~Annual Meeting will be maintained at the Company’s principal executive offices at 300 Madison Avenue, Toledo, Ohio, for a period of his or her death or retirement from the Board, 100% of the shares of Libbey common stock issued to him or her on the date of each annual shareholders meeting and all other shares of Libbey common stock that he or she owned as of November 1, 2015 or otherwise may acquire after November 1, 2015. The Director Retention Guidelines do not apply to cash or stock compensation that was deferred by a non-management director, before November 1, 2015, pursuant to any of our deferred compensation plans covering non-management directors if:

Pursuant to the applicable deferral election in effect immediately before November 1, 2015, the deferred compensation is to be distributed on a date that may precede the first to occur of the non-management director's death or retirement from the Board; and

~~In the case of deferred cash compensation, the cash was deemed invested in "phantom stock" or the Libbey common stock fund pursuant to the applicable deferred compensation plan.~~

~~As of March 20, 2017, all of our existing non-management directors are in compliance with the Director Retention Guidelines.~~

~~Executive Stock Ownership / Retention Guidelines~~. In October 2007, we established guidelines pursuant to which our executive officers also are required to achieve ownership of meaningful amounts of equity in Libbey. We refer to the guidelines, as originally established, as the Original Guidelines.

Under the Original Guidelines, each executive officer was required to own a specified number of shares of Libbey common stock equal to a multiple of his or her base salary in effect on January 1, 2008 or, if later, the date on which the executive officer became subject to the guidelines. Ms. Kovach is the only executive officer who remains subject to the Original Guidelines. As of December 31, 2016, she was in compliance with the Original Guidelines.

In late 2012, we transitioned our executive stock ownership guidelines to stock retention guidelines to provide greater parity between long-time executive officers and our newer executive officers and to further align our executives’ interests with those of shareholders. We refer to the new stock retention guidelines as the Executive Retention Guidelines.

~~Under the Executive Retention Guidelines, each executive is generally required to retain, until his or her separation from service:~~

~~50% of the net after-tax shares underlying each grant of RSUs made after January 1, 2013 that subsequently vests; and~~

~~50% of the net after-tax shares underlying NQSOs granted after January 1, 2013 that the executive subsequently exercises.~~

Ms. Kovach is exempt from the Executive Retention Guidelines until January 1, 2018. Until then, she may sell or otherwise dispose of our stock, but only to the extent of any shares in excess of her ownership guideline under the Original Guidelines.

~~Executives nearing retirement are released from our guidelines on the date the Board is notified of the planned retirement, or one year~~at least ten days before the ~~contemplated retirement date, whichever is later.~~Annual Meeting.

~~As of December 31, 2016, Messrs. Foley and Minarro and Ms. Cerioli were in compliance with the Executive Retention Guidelines.~~

WHAT MAY I VOTE ON, WHAT ARE MY VOTING OPTIONS AND HOW DOES THE BOARD RECOMMEND THAT I VOTE?



~~STOCK OWNERSHIP~~

~~Beneficial Ownership Table~~

The following table shows, as of March 20, 2017, the number of shares of our common stock and percentage of all issued and outstanding shares of our common stock that are beneficially owned by our directors, the named executives and our directors and executive officers as a group. With respect to those named executives were no longer employed by the Company as of March 20, 2017, the information included in this table is accurate to the best of our knowledge. Our address, as set forth on the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, is the address of each director and named executive set forth below. The shares owned by the named executives set forth below include the shares held in their accounts in our 401(k) plan. An asterisk indicates ownership of less than one percent of the outstanding stock.

Name of Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership

Percent
of Class
Sherry Buck^(1)(2)(4)
69,538
*
Anunciata (Nucci) Cerioli⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
18,116
*
Carlos V. Duno⁽³⁾
37,648
*
William A. Foley^(1)(2)(3)
89,376
*
Ginger M. Jones⁽³⁾
10,599
*
Theo Killion⁽³⁾
6,381
*
Susan A. Kovach⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
50,788
*
Eileen A. Mallesch⁽³⁾
0
*
Deborah G. Miller⁽³⁾
25,492
*
Salvador Miñarro Villalobos⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
86,596
*
Carol B. Moerdyk⁽³⁾
38,095
*
John C. Orr⁽³⁾
29,423
*
Stephanie A. Streeter^(1)(2)(4)
109,350
*
James H. White^(1)(2)(4)
10,413
*
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group^(1)(2)(3)(4)
600,344
2.74%


~~(1)~~	Does not include shares of our common stock that have vested but are deferred under our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which we refer to as our EDCP. As of March 20, 2017, each of our named executives, and all executive officers as a group, had the following number of shares of our common stock that are vested but deferred under our EDCP:



~~Named Executive~~		~~Number of Deferred Shares~~
~~S. Buck~~		~~5,355~~
~~A. Cerioli~~		0
~~W. Foley~~		0
~~S. Kovach~~		~~16,670~~
~~S. Miñarro~~		0
~~S. Streeter~~		0
~~J. White~~		0
~~All executive officers as a group~~		~~22,025~~


~~(2)~~	Includes the following number of NQSOs that have been granted to our named executives and all executive officers as a group and that currently are exercisable or will be exercisable on or before May 19, 2017:



~~Named Executive~~		~~Number of Outstanding Stock Options Exercisable Within 60 Days~~
~~S. Buck~~		~~49,958~~
~~A. Cerioli~~		~~11,527~~
~~W. Foley~~		~~31,650~~
~~S. Kovach~~		~~30,014~~
~~S. Miñarro~~		~~72,194~~
~~S. Streeter~~		0
~~J. White~~		0
~~All executive officers as a group~~		~~210,693~~



	~~STOCK OWNERSHIP~~


~~(3)~~	Includes the following number of shares of our common stock that are deferred by non-management directors under our 2009 Director Deferred Compensation Plan, which we refer to as our Director DCP, and that are payable as shares of our common stock:



~~Name of Director~~Proposal			~~Number of~~ ~~Deferred Shares~~
~~C. Duno~~Voting Options		~~24,522~~	Board Recommendation
1	~~W. Foley~~Election of Directors:^(a) Election of Ginger M. Jones and Eileen A. Mallesch to serve as Class II directors		0	For, Withhold (as to any
~~G. Jones~~nominee) or Abstain		0	FOReach of Ms. Jones and Ms. Mallesch
~~T. Killion~~2	Advisory Say-on-Pay: RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executives, as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K		0
~~E. Mallesch~~For, Against or Abstain		0	FOR
~~D. Miller~~3	Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan: Approval of the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan		0
~~C. Moerdyk~~For, Against or Abstain		0	FOR
~~J. Orr~~4	Ratification of Independent Auditor: Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Libbey’s independent auditors for the 2019 fiscal year		0
~~All non-management directors as a group~~For, Against or Abstain		~~24,522~~	FOR

~~Does not include~~

HOW DO I VOTE?

Registered Shareholders

If you are a registered shareholder, you may vote in any of the following ~~number~~ways:



(		Vote by telephone: Call toll-free 1-800-690-6903, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 11:59 p.m., eastern daylight saving time, on May 14, 2019. Make sure you have your proxy card, notice document or email that you received and follow the simple instructions provided.
:		Vote over the internet: Go to www.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 11:59 p.m., eastern daylight saving time, on May 14, 2019. Make sure you have available the proxy card, notice document or email that you received and follow the simple instructions provided.
*		Vote by mail: If you received printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may mark, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope that was provided to you. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as guardian, executor, trustee, custodian, attorney or officer of a corporation), you should indicate your name and title or capacity.
		Vote in person at the annual meeting: Bring the proxy card, notice document or email you received and bring other proof of identification and request a ballot at the meeting.

Shares held jointly by two or more registered shareholders may be voted by any joint owner unless we receive written notice from another joint owner denying the authority of the first joint owner to vote those shares.

2019 Proxy Statement 71

Questions and Answers About the Meeting

Shares Held in Street Name

If you hold your shares in street name — in other words, you hold your shares through a broker or other nominee — you will receive from your broker a notice regarding availability of proxy materials that will tell you how to access our proxy materials and provide voting instructions to your broker over the internet. It also will tell you how to request a paper or e-mail copy of our proxy materials. If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will not be voted on any proposals on which your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote, including Proposals 1 through 3.

Shares Held Through 401(k) Plan

If you participate in one of our 401(k) plans, and if you have investments in the Libbey Inc. stock fund and have an e-mail address provided by Libbey for business purposes, you will receive an e-mail message at your Libbey-provided e-mail address containing instructions that you must follow in order for shares in your account to be voted. If you participate in one of our 401(k) plans, have investments in the Libbey Inc. stock fund and do not have an e-mail address provided by Libbey for business purposes, you will receive instructions from the trustee of the applicable 401(k) plan that you must follow in order for shares in your account to be voted.

MAY I CHANGE MY VOTE?

If you are a shareholder of record, you may, at any time before your shares are voted at the annual meeting, change your vote or revoke your proxy by:

sending us a proxy card dated later than your last vote;

notifying the Secretary of Libbey in writing; or

voting at the meeting.

If you hold your shares in street name through a broker or other nominee, you should contact your broker or nominee to determine how to change your vote or revoke your proxy.

HOW MANY SHARES OF LIBBEY COMMON STOCK ARE OUTSTANDING?

At the close of business on March 20, 2019, there were 22,273,568 shares of ~~phantom~~Libbey common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote.

HOW BIG A VOTE DO THE PROPOSALS NEED IN ORDER TO BE ADOPTED?

Provided that ~~are held~~a quorum is present either in person or by ~~non-management directors pursuant to our deferred compensation plans for outside directors and that are payable in cash:~~proxy at the Annual Meeting, Proposals 1 through 4 must receive the required votes set forth below:



~~Name of Director~~Proposal			~~Number of~~ ~~Phantom Shares~~ Required Vote
~~C. Duno~~1	Election of Ginger M. Jones and Eileen A. Mallesch as Class II directors		0	Since the election of directors is uncontested, each director must receive the vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to such director’s election.
~~W. Foley~~^(a) 2	Advisory Say-on-Pay		~~12,348~~	The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal.
~~G. Jones~~3	Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan		0	The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal.
~~T. Killion~~4	Ratification of Independent Auditors		0
~~E. Mallesch~~		0
~~D. Miller~~		~~2,298~~
~~C. Moerdyk~~		~~19,347~~
~~J. Orr~~		0
~~All non-management directors as~~The affirmative vote of a ~~group~~		~~33,993~~	majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal.

~~(a) Mr. Foley was~~

WHAT CONSTITUTES A QUORUM?

Under our By-laws, the holders of a ~~non-management director~~majority of the total shares issued and outstanding, whether present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum, permitting business to be transacted at the meeting.

72Libbey Inc.

Questions and Answers About the Meeting

HOW WILL VOTES BE COUNTED?

Votes cast in person or by proxy will be tabulated by the inspector of elections appointed for the meeting and will determine whether a quorum is present. Abstentions will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. For purposes of determining whether the shareholders have approved a matter, abstentions are not treated as votes cast “for,” “against” or “withheld,” and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of any of Proposals 1 – 4. Additionally, broker non-votes will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to any of Proposals 1 – 3. The common stock outstanding on the record date held by the trustee under Libbey’s 401(k) plans will be voted by the trustee in accordance with instructions from ~~1994 until he assumed~~participants in those plans. Votes will not be cast with respect to those shares in the ~~role of CEO on January 12, 2016.~~

~~For more information regarding our deferred compensation~~ plans for ~~non-management~~which no instructions are received.

WHAT ARE BROKER NON-VOTES?

If you hold your shares in street name through a broker or other nominee, your broker or nominee may not be permitted to vote your shares with respect to certain matters, including Proposals 1 – 3, unless you give your broker or nominee specific instructions as to how to vote. Non-voted shares on non-routine matters are called broker non-votes. They will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval but will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.

HOW WILL VOTING BE CONDUCTED ON OTHER MATTERS RAISED AT THE MEETING?

The proxy committee will vote on other matters that properly come before the meeting in accordance with the Board’s recommendation or, if no recommendation is given, in the discretion of the proxy committee.

WHEN MUST SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS BE SUBMITTED FOR THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING?

A shareholder desiring to submit a proposal for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting must deliver the proposal so that we receive it no later than November 29, 2019. Any proposal submitted outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act will be considered untimely if submitted after February 12, 2020. A shareholder desiring to nominate one or more directors ~~see~~for election at our 2020 Annual Meeting must deliver the written nomination no earlier than January 16, 2020, and no later than February 17, 2020. All such proposals must be addressed to Susan A. Kovach, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Libbey Inc., 300 Madison Avenue, P.O. Box 10060, Toledo, Ohio 43699-0060.

2019 Proxy Statement 73

~~‘‘Compensation-Related Matters — Non-Management Directors’ Compensation in 2017’’~~ ~~above.~~


~~(4)~~	Based on last known information as of date of separation from service. For Ms. Buck, that date was December 31, 2016. For Ms. Streeter, that date was January 11, 2016. For Mr. White, that date was March 31, 2016.

In addition to outstanding shares of common stock that our named executives beneficially owned as of March 20, 2017 or, for those no longer employed by the Company as of that date, as of their last date of employment, the named executives and all executive officers as a group have received the following grants of RSUs that have not yet vested:

GENERAL INFORMATION



~~Named Executive~~		~~Number of~~ ~~Unvested RSUs~~⁽¹⁾
~~S. Buck~~		0
~~A. Cerioli~~		~~16,715~~
~~W. Foley~~		~~88,670~~
~~S. Kovach~~		~~14,709~~
~~S. Miñarro~~		~~24,990~~
~~S. Streeter~~		0
~~J. White~~		0
~~All executive officers as a group~~		~~166,338~~

~~(1)~~

Of these amounts, a total of 2,855 RSUs with four-year vesting were awarded on February 24, 2014; a total of 4,178 RSUs with four-year vesting were awarded on December 1, 2014; a total of 12,956 RSUs with four-year vesting were awarded on February 16, 2015; a total of 1,674 RSUs with four-year vesting were awarded on May 18, 2015; a total of 1,875 RSUs with four-year vesting were awarded on June 11, 2015; a total of 4,125 RSUs with four-year vesting were awarded on December 11, 2015; a total of 72,457 RSUs with four-year vesting were awarded on February 8,



~~STOCK OWNERSHIP~~

2016; a total of 1,500 RSUs with four-year vesting were awarded on August 18, 2016; and a total of 64,718 RSUs with four-year vesting were awarded on February 6, 2017. One share of our common stock will be issued for each vested RSU. Dividends do not accrue on RSUs until they vest. For further information, see ~~‘‘Compensation-Related Matters — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — In what forms does Libbey deliver pay to its executives, and what purposes do the various forms of pay serve?’’~~ ~~and the~~ ~~Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table~~ ~~above.~~

~~Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance~~

Based solely on our review of filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and written representations that no other reports were required to be filed by the relevant persons, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, all officers, directors and greater-than-10% beneficial owners complied, on a timely basis, with the filing requirements applicable to them pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.



	~~GENERAL INFORMATION~~

~~GENERAL INFORMATION~~

Certain Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various routine legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are a named potentially responsible party with respect to a landfill in West Covina, California, and with respect to the Lower Ley Creek and Upper Ley Creek sub-sites of the Onondaga (New York) Lake Superfund Site. For a detailed discussion of these environmental contingencies, see note 17, Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2018. In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to examination by various countries' tax authorities. These examinations may lead to proposed or assessed adjustments to our taxes. For a detailed discussion on tax contingencies, see note 8,7, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~year ended~~year-ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2018.

Other Business

As of the date of this proxy statement, neither the Board nor management knows of any other business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. However, if other proper matters are presented at the meeting, it is the intention of the proxy committee to take such action as shall be in accordance with their judgment on such matters. All other matters to be voted upon by shareholders will require a majority vote of common stock represented in person or by proxy.

Solicitation Costs

The Company has retained Georgeson ~~Shareholder~~ to ~~solicit~~assist in the ~~submission~~solicitation of ~~proxies authorizing~~proxies. We estimate the ~~voting~~cost of ~~shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations. The Company has agreed to pay a fee of $8,000,~~Georgeson's services will be approximately $10,000, plus expenses for out-of-pocket ~~costs, for Georgeson’s services.~~costs. Certain of the Company’s officers and employees may solicit the submission of proxies authorizing the voting of shares in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations, but no additional remuneration will be paid by the Company for the solicitation of those proxies. Such solicitations may be made by personal interview, telephone or ~~telegram.~~electronic communication. Arrangements ~~have been made with Corporate Investor Communications, Inc. to perform a broker-nominee search. Arrangements also~~ have been made with brokerage firms and others for the forwarding of proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of common stock, and the Company will reimburse them for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith. The Company will pay the cost of preparing and mailing this proxy statement and other costs of the proxy solicitation made by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Reports to Shareholders

We are pleased to take advantage of SEC rules that permit issuers to furnish their proxy materials to shareholders on the internet. Shareholders may request a paper copy of this proxy statement and the ~~2016~~2018 Annual Report by:



Internet	www.proxyvote.com
Telephone	1-800-579-1639
Email	sendmaterial@proxyvote.com

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~year ended~~year-ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, including the consolidated financial statements, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, may be obtained without charge by sending a written request to Libbey Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 300 Madison Avenue, P.O. Box 10060, Toledo, Ohio 43699-0060.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Susan A. Kovach
Secretary

~~SUSAN A. KOVACH,~~

~~Secretary~~Toledo, Ohio
March 28, 2019

~~Toledo, Ohio~~

74Libbey Inc.

Appendix A

APPENDIX A

Calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Cash Earnings

Used For Incentive Compensation Purposes

(dollars in thousands)



	Year-ended December 31, 2018
Adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾
Reported net income (loss) (U.S. GAAP)	$	(7,956	)
Add: Interest expense		21,979
Add: Provision for income taxes		10,253
Add: Depreciation and amortization		44,333
Add: Special item before interest and taxes
Fees associated with strategic initiative		2,341
Reported Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)		70,950
Impact of currency to reflect results at budgeted exchange rates		1,516
Adjusted EBITDA at budgeted exchange rates (non-GAAP)	$	72,466

Increase in Trade Working Capital⁽²⁾
Decrease in accounts receivable - net	$	(6,020	)
Increase in inventories - net		4,217
Decrease in accounts payable		3,510
Increase in Trade Working Capital (non-GAAP)		1,707
Decrease due to currency		2,198
Increase in Trade Working Capital at budgeted exchange rates (non-GAAP)	$	3,905

Adjusted Cash Earnings
Adjusted EBITDA at budgeted exchange rates (non-GAAP)	$	72,466
Increase in Trade Working Capital at budgeted exchange rates (non-GAAP)		(3,905	)
Adjusted Cash Earnings at budgeted exchange rates (non-GAAP)	$	68,561

(1)

We believe that Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is a useful metric for evaluating our financial performance, as it is a measure that we use internally to assess our performance. For certain limitations and a reconciliation from net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA, see the "Non-GAAP Measures" and "Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA" sections included in Part II, Item 6. Selected Financial Data, in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2)

Trade Working Capital, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as net accounts receivable plus net inventories less accounts payable. We believe that Trade Working Capital is important supplemental information for investors in evaluating liquidity in that it provides insight into the availability of net current resources to fund our ongoing operations. Trade Working Capital is a measure used by management in internal evaluations of cash availability and operational performance.

Trade Working Capital is used in conjunction with and in addition to results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Trade Working Capital is neither intended to represent nor be an alternative to any measure of liquidity and operational performance recorded under U.S. GAAP. Trade Working Capital may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as after tax adjusted income from operations (using a 35% tax rate) over ending Trade Working Capital (accounts receivable-net plus inventory-net, less accounts payable) plus net book value of property, plant and equipment. For purposes of the 2016 LTIP (2016-2018 performance period), the calculation of ROIC for the 2016 plan year is included in Appendix A of our proxy statement filed on April 4, 2017, and the calculation of ROIC for the 2017 plan year is included in Appendix A of our proxy statement filed on March 29, 2018.

2019 Proxy Statement A-1

APPENDIX B

Amended and Restated

Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Effective May 10, 2016May 15, 2019

B-1Libbey Inc.

Appendix B

Contents



~~APPENDIX A~~

Article 1. Establishment, Purpose, and Duration	B-3
Article 2. Definitions	B-3
Article 3. Administration	B-6
Article 4. Shares Subject to this Plan and Maximum Awards	B-7
Article 5. Eligibility and Participation	B-8
Article 6. Stock Options	B-8
Article 7. Stock Appreciation Rights	B-9
Article 8. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units	B-10
Article 9. Performance Units/Performance Shares	B-11
Article 10. Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards	B-12
Article 11. Transferability of Awards	B-12
Article 12. Performance Measures	B-12
Article 1312. Non-employee Director Awards	B-13
Article 1413. Dividends and Dividend Equivalents	B-13
Article 1514. Beneficiary Designation	B-14
Article 1615. Rights of Participants	B-14
Article 1716. Change of Control	B-14
Article 1817. Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination	B-15
Article 1918. Withholding	B-15
Article 2019. Successors	B-15
Article 2120. General Provisions	B-15

~~APPENDIX A~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Year ended December 31, 2016
As Reported For LTIP Incentive Calculations
Revenue
Reported net sales $ 793,420
$ 793,420

Adjusted EBITDA
Reported net income $ 10,073
$ 10,073
Add: Interest expense 20,888
20,888
Add: Provision for income taxes 17,711
17,711
Earnings before interest and income taxes (EBIT) 48,672
48,672
Add: Depreciation and amortization 48,486
48,486
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 97,158
97,158
Add: Special items before interest and taxes
Pension settlement 168
168
Product portfolio optimization 5,693
5,693
Work Stoppage 4,162
4,162
Executive terminations 4,460
4,460
Derivatives (1,860 ) (1,860 )
Adjusted EBITDA $ 109,781
$ 109,781

Adjusted EBITDA margin
Adjusted EBITDA $ 109,781
$ 109,781
Net sales $ 793,420
$ 793,420
Adjusted EBITDA margin 13.8 % 13.8 %

Debt net of cash to Adjusted EBITDA ratio
Debt $ 407,840
$ 407,840
Plus: Unamortized discount and finance fees 4,480
4,480
Gross debt 412,320
412,320
Cash 61,011
61,011
Less: Share repurchases below budgeted amount —
8,000
Debt net of Cash $ 351,309
$ 359,309
Adjusted EBITDA $ 109,781
$ 109,781
Debt net of cash to adjusted EBITDA ratio 3.2
3.3

2019 Proxy Statement B-2

Appendix B

Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Article 1. Establishment, Purpose, and Duration

1.1Establishment. Libbey Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), establishesoriginally adopted an incentive compensation plan to be known as the Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”), effective May 10, 2016. The Company hereby amends and restates the 2016 Plan in the form of this Amended and Restated 2016 Libbey Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan as set forth in this document. The 2016 Plan, as so amended and restated, is referred to as the "Plan."

This Plan permits the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Cash-Based Awardsand Other Stock-Based Awards.

This Plan shall become effective upon shareholder approval (the “Effective Date”) and shall remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 hereof.

1.2 Purpose of this Plan. The purpose of this Plan is to enable the Company to obtain and retain the services of Employees and Non-employee Directors considered essential to the long-range success of the Company, to provide a means whereby Employees and Non-employee Directors develop a sense of proprietorship and personal involvement in the development and financial success of the Company, and to encourage them to devote their best efforts to the business of the Company, thereby advancing the interests of the Company and its shareholders.

1.3Duration of this Plan. Unless sooner terminated as provided in this Plan, this Plan shall terminate ten (10) years from the Effective Date. After this Plan is terminated, no Awards may be granted, but Awards previously granted shall remain outstanding in accordance with their applicable terms and conditions and this Plan’s terms and conditions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Incentive Stock Options may be granted more than ten (10) years after the earlier of (a) adoption of this Plan by the Board or (b) the Effective Date.

Article 2. Definitions

Whenever used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word shall be capitalized.



2.1	~~APPENDIX A~~ “Affiliate” means any corporation or other entity (including, but not limited to, a partnership or a limited liability company) that is affiliated with the Company through stock or equity ownership, or otherwise, and is designated as an Affiliate for purposes of this Plan by the Committee. For purposes of granting Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, an entity may not be considered an Affiliate if it results in noncompliance with Code Section 409A.

Year ended December 31, 2016
As Reported For LTIP Incentive Calculations
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
Defined as: After tax adjusted income from operations (using a 30% tax rate) over ending working capital (accounts receivable-net plus inventory-net, less accounts payable) plus net book value of property, plant and equipment
Income from operations $ 45,310
$ 45,310
Add: Adjustments
Product portfolio optimization charge 5,693
5,693
Work stoppage 4,162
4,162
Executive terminations 4,460
3,554
Pension settlement charges 168
—
Mexico tax assessment —
1,085
Adjusted income from operations 59,793
59,804
Add: Impact of currency to reflect results at budgeted exchange rates —
4,574
Adjusted income from operations at budgeted exchange rates 59,793
64,378
Factor to apply for taxes 70 % 70 %
After tax adjusted income from operations at budgeted exchange rates $ 41,855
$ 45,065

Invested capital
Property, plant and equipment, net $ 256,392
$ 256,392
Add: Impact of currency to reflect results at budgeted exchange rates —
4,174
Property, plant and equipment, net at budgeted exchange rates 256,392
260,566
Accounts receivable - net 85,113
85,113
Inventories - net 170,009
170,009
Less: Accounts payable 71,582
71,582
Trade Working Capital 183,540
183,540
Add: Adjustments
Inventory impact of work stoppage at Toledo, Ohio plant —
2,694
Inventory impact of product portfolio optimization —
5,693
Adjusted trade working capital 183,540
191,927
Add: Impact of currency —
4,616
Adjusted trade working capital at budgeted exchange rates 183,540
196,543
Total adjusted invested capital at budgeted exchange rates $ 439,932
$ 457,109

ROIC 9.5 % 9.9 %



~~APPENDIX B~~2.2	“Annual Award Limit” or “Annual Award Limits” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.3.


2.3	“Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under this Plan of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Cash-Based Awardsor Other Stock-Based Awards, in each case subject to the terms of this Plan.

2.4

“Award Agreement” or “Agreement” means either (i) a written agreement entered into by the Company and a Participant setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award granted under this Plan or (ii) a written statement issued by the Company to a Participant describing the terms and provisions of the Award, including any amendment or modification thereof. The Committee may provide for the use of electronic, internet or other non-paper Award Agreements and the use of electronic, internet or other non-paper means for the acceptance of the Award Agreements and actions under them by a Participant.


2.5	“Beneficial Owner” or “Beneficial Ownership” has the meaning ascribed to that term in Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.


2.6	“Board” or “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company.


2.7	“Cash-Based Award” means an Award, denominated in cash, granted to a Participant as described in Article 10.


2.8	“Change in Control” means any of the following events:

(a)

Any Person (as defined below) is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then-outstanding securities. For purposes of this Plan, the term “Person” is used as that term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act; provided, however, that the term shall not include (i) the Company, any trustee or other fiduciary holding

B-3Libbey Inc.

Appendix B

securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company, or (ii) any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the shareholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company, and provided further that this subsection (a) shall not apply to any Person who is the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then-outstanding securities as of the Effective Date of this Plan if and for so long as that Person does not beneficially own, or increase its beneficial ownership to, twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then-outstanding securities;


(b)	During any period of two (2) consecutive years beginning after the Effective Date of this Plan, Continuing Directors (excluding any Directors designated by a Person who has entered into an agreement with the Company to effect a transaction described in Sections 2.8(a), (c) or (d)) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;

(c)

The consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation or other entity, unless, after giving effect to the merger or consolidation, the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to the merger or consolidation continue to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or the surviving entity outstanding immediately after the merger or consolidation; or


(d)	Consummation of a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.


2.9	“Code” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time. For purposes of this Plan, references to sections of the Code shall be deemed to include references to any applicable regulations under the Code and any successor or similar provision.

2.10

“Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or a subcommittee thereof, or any other committee designated by the Board to administer this Plan. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall serve at the discretion of, the Board. If the Committee does not exist or cannot function for any reason, the Board may take any action under the Plan that otherwise would be the responsibility of the Committee.


2.11	“Company” means Libbey Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any successor thereto as provided in Article 2019.

2.12

“Continuing Directors” means individuals who both (a) as of the end of the period in question are Directors of the Company or whose election or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders has been approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors of the Company then in office and (b) either (i) at the beginning of the period in question or (ii) after the beginning but prior to the end of the period in question were Directors of the Company or whose election or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors of the Company in office at the beginning of the period.

2.13

“Covered Employee” means any Employee who is or may become a “Covered Employee,” as defined in Code Section 162(m), and who is designated, either as an individual Employee or class of Employees, by the Committee within the shorter of (i) ninety (90) days after the beginning of the Performance Period or (ii) twenty-five percent (25%) of the Performance Period has elapsed, as a “Covered Employee” under this Plan for the applicable Performance Period.


2.14	2.13 “Director” means any individual who is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.


2.15	2.14 “Dividend Equivalent” means a right to receive the equivalent value (in cash or Shares) of dividends paid on common stock, awarded under Article 1413.


2.16	2.15 “DRO” means a domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the rules under such statute.


2.17	2.16 “Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.


2.18	2.17 “Employee” means any individual designated as an employee of the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries on the payroll records thereof.


2.19	2.18 “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor act thereto.

2.20

2.19 “Fair Market Value” or “FMV” means a price that is based on the opening, closing, actual, high, low or average selling prices of a Share reported on the NYSE, NYSE MKTAmerican or other established stock exchange (or exchanges) on the applicable date, the preceding trading day, the next preceding trading day, the next succeeding trading day or an average of trading days, as determined by the Committee in its discretion. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, Fair Market Value shall be deemed to be equal to the closing price of a Share on the applicable date, or if shares were not traded on the applicable date, then on the preceding trading day. If Shares are not publicly traded at the time a determination of their value is required to be made under this Plan, then the determination of their Fair Market Value shall be made by the Committee in such manner as it deems appropriate, provided that, in the case of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, the determination shall be made in compliance with Code Section 409A. The definition(s) of FMV shall be specified in each

2019 Proxy Statement B-4

Appendix B

Award Agreement and may differ depending on whether FMV is in reference to the grant, exercise, vesting, settlement or payout of an Award.


2.21	2.20 “Full Value Award” means an Award other than in the form of an ISO, NQSO or SAR.


2.22	2.21 “Grant Price” means the price established at the time of grant of an SAR pursuant to Article 7.


2.23	2.22 “Incentive Stock Option” or “ISO” means an Option that is granted under Article 6 to an Employee, that is designated as an Incentive Stock Option and that is intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422 or any successor provision.


2.24	2.23 “Insider” means an individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer or Director of the Company, or the Beneficial Owner of more than ten percent (10%) of any class of the Company’s equity securities that are registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, as determined by the Board in accordance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

2.25

2.24 “Nominating and Governance Committee” means the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board or a subcommittee thereof, or any other committee designated by the Board to administer the pay of Non-employee Directors pursuant to this Plan. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall serve at the discretion of, the Board. If the Nominating and Governance Committee does not exist or cannot function for any reason, the Board may take any action under the Plan that otherwise would be the responsibility of the Nominating and Governance Committee.


2.26	2.25 “Non-employee Director” means a Director who is not an Employee.


2.27	2.26 “Non-employee Director Award” means any NQSO, SAR or Full Value Award granted, whether singly, in combination, or in tandem, to a Non-employee Director.


2.28	2.27 “Nonqualified Stock Option” or “NQSO” means an Option that is not intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422 or that otherwise does not meet those requirements.


2.29	2.28 “NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange.


2.30	2.29 “Option” means an option granted to a Participant to purchase the Company’s Shares, including an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option, as described in Article 6.


2.31	2.30 “Option Price” means the price at which a Participant may purchase a Share pursuant to an Option.


2.32	2.31 “Other Stock-Based Award” means an equity-based or equity-related Award that is not otherwise described by the terms of this Plan and that is granted pursuant to Article 10.


2.33	2.32 “Participant” means any eligible individual, as determined in accordance with Article 5, to whom an Award is granted.

2.34

“Performance-Based Compensation” means compensation under an Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for certain performance-based compensation paid to Covered Employees. However, nothing in this Plan shall be construed to mean that an Award that does not satisfy the requirements for performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) does not constitute performance-based compensation for other purposes, including Code Section 409A.


2.35	“Performance Measures” means the measures, as described in Article 12, on which the performance goals are based. Performance Measures must be approved by the Company’s shareholders pursuant to this Plan in order to qualify Awards as Performance-Based Compensation.


2.36	2.33 “Performance Period” means the period of time during which the performance goals must be met in order to determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to an Award.


2.37	2.34 “Performance Share” means an Award that is granted pursuant to Article 9, is subject to the terms of this Plan and is denominated in Shares, the value of which at the time it is payable is determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance criteria have been achieved.


2.38	2.35 “Performance Unit” means an Award that is granted pursuant to Article 9, is subject to the terms of this Plan and is denominated in units, the value of which at the time it is payable is determined as a function of the extent to which corresponding performance criteria have been achieved.


2.39	2.36 “Period of Restriction” means the period during which Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture based on the passage of time, the achievement of performance goals or the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, in its discretion, as provided in Article 8.


2.40	2.37 “Plan” means the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.


2.41	2.38 “Plan Year” means the calendar year.

B-5Libbey Inc.

Appendix B


2.42	2.39 “Replaced Award” means an Award that is granted under this Plan and as to which vesting will be accelerated upon a Change in Control unless the Participant is provided with a Replacement Award.


2.43	2.40 “Replacement Award” means an Award that meets the requirements of Section 17.216.2 and is provided to the Participant to replace a Replaced Award.


2.44	2.41 “Restricted Stock” means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 8.


2.45	2.42 “Restricted Stock Unit” means an Award that is granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 8 but as to which no Shares actually are awarded to the Participant on the date of grant.


2.46	2.43 “Share” means a share of common stock of the Company, $.01par value per share.


2.47	“Special Items” means unanticipated or unusual transactions or events that were not foreseen or were foreseen but not included in the Company’s annual operating plan because the occurrence of the event was substantially uncertain at the time the annual operating plan was submitted to the Board.


2.48	2.44 “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means an Award, designated as a SAR, pursuant to the terms of Article 7.


2.49	2.45 “Subsidiary” means any corporation or other entity, whether domestic or foreign, in which the Company directly or indirectly owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock.

2.50

2.46 “Substitute Award” means an Award that, in connection with a corporate transaction such as a merger, combination, consolidation or acquisition of property or stock, is granted under this Plan upon the assumption by the Company of, or in substitution by the Company for, an outstanding equity award previously granted by another company or entity to the corporate transaction; provided, however, that in no event shall the term “Substitute Award” be construed to refer to an Award made in connection with the cancellation and repricing of an Option or SAR.

2.51

2.47 “Termination of Employment” means the time when the employee-employer relationship between a Participant and the Company or any Subsidiary is terminated for any reason, with or without cause. Termination of Employment includes, but is not limited to, termination by resignation, discharge, death, disability or retirement, but excludes, at the discretion of the Committee, (a) termination where there is a simultaneous reemployment or continuing employment of a Participant by the Company or any Subsidiary, (b) termination that results in temporary severance of the employee-employer relationship, and (c) termination where there is simultaneous establishment of a consulting relationship by the Company or a Subsidiary with a former Employee. The Committee, in its absolute discretion, shall determine the effect of all matters and questions relating to Termination of Employment, including, without limitation, the question of whether a Termination of Employment resulted from a discharge for good cause, and all questions of whether a particular leave of absence constitutes a Termination of Employment; provided, however, that, with respect to Incentive Stock Options, unless otherwise determined by the Committee in its discretion, a leave of absence, change in status from an Employee to an independent contractor, or other change in the employee-employer relationship shall constitute a Termination of Employment if and to the extent that the leave of absence, change in status or other change interrupts employment for the purposes of Section 422(a)(2) of the Code and the then applicable regulations and revenue rulings under that Section of the Code.

Article 3.Administration

3.1General. The Committee shall be responsible for administering this Plan, subject to this Article 3 and the other provisions of this Plan. The Committee may employ attorneys, consultants, accountants, agents and other individuals, any of whom may be an Employee, and the Committee, the Company and its officers and Directors shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions, or valuations of any such individuals. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee shall be final and binding upon the Participants, the Company, and all other interested individuals.

3.2Authority of the Committee. The Committee shall have full and exclusive discretionary power to interpret the terms and the intent of this Plan and any Award Agreement or other agreement or document ancillary to or in connection with this Plan, to determine eligibility of Employees for Awards and to adopt such rules, regulations, forms, instruments and guidelines for administering this Plan as the Committee may deem necessary or proper. That authority shall include, but not be limited to: selecting which Employees are Award recipients; establishing all Award terms and conditions, including the terms and conditions set forth in Award Agreements; accelerating the vesting of Awards; granting Awards as an alternative to or as the form of payment for grants or rights earned or due under compensation plans or arrangements of the Company; construing any ambiguous provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement; and, subject to Article 1817, adopting modifications and amendments to this Plan or any Award Agreement, including without limitation, any that are necessary to comply with the laws of the countries and other jurisdictions in which the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries operate.

3.3 Delegation.The Committee may delegate to one or more of its members or to one or more officers of the Company, and/or its Subsidiaries and Affiliates, or to one or more agents or advisors, such administrative duties or powers as the Committee may deem advisable, and the Committee or any individuals to whom it has delegated duties or powers may employ one or more individuals to render advice with respect to any responsibility the Committee or those individuals may have under this Plan. The Committee may, by resolution, authorize one or more officers of the Company to do one or both of the following on the same basis as can the Committee:

2019 Proxy Statement B-6

Appendix B

(a) designate Employees to be recipients of Awards; and (b) determine the size of and vesting terms for any such Awards; provided, however, that (i) in the case of Awards to be granted to Employees who are considered Insiders, the Committee shall not delegate these responsibilities to any officer; (ii) the resolution providing the authorization sets forth the total number of Awards the officer(s) may grant; and (iii) the officer(s) shall report periodically to the Committee regarding the nature and scope of the Awards granted pursuant to the delegated authority.

Article 4. Shares Subject to this Plan and Maximum Awards

4.1 Number of Shares Available for Awards.


(a)	There is hereby reserved for issuance under the Plan an aggregate of one million two hundred thousand (1,200,000)one million nine hundred thirty-four thousand ninety-three (1,934,093) Shares of Libbey Inc. common stock.


(b)	The maximum number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to ISOs under this Plan shall be one million two hundred thousand (1,200,000)one million nine hundred thirty-four thousand ninety-three (1,934,093) Shares.


(c)	The maximum number of Shares that may be granted to Non-employee Directors collectively in any Plan Year shall be 150,000200,000 Shares, and no Non-employee Director may receive Awards subject to more than 20,000 Shares in any Plan Year.

(d)

Except with respect to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the shares authorized for issuance under this Plan, and subject to Section 3.3 above, any Full Value Awards that vest on the basis of the Participant’s continued employment with or service to the Company shall not provide for vesting that is any more rapid than annual pro rata vesting over a three- (3) year period, with the first vesting date occurring no earlier thanprior to the first anniversary of the date on which such Awards are approved, and any Full Value Awards that vest upon the attainment of performance goals shall provide for a performance period of at least twelve (12) months. Subject to Section 3.3 above, Awards of SARs and/or Options that vest on the basis of the Participant’s continued employment with or service to the Company shall not provide for vesting prior to the first anniversary of the date on which such Awards are approved.

4.2Share Counting. Awards that are required to be paid in cash pursuant to their terms will not reduce the share reserve. To the extent that an Award granted under thethis Plan is canceled, expired, forfeited, surrendered, settled by delivery of fewer shares than the number underlying the Award, settled in cash or otherwise terminated without delivery of the shares, the shares of common stock retained by or returned to the Company will (a) not be deemed to have been delivered under the Plan, (b) be available for future Awards under the Plan, and (c) increase the share reserve by one share for each share that is retained by or returned to the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, shares that are (i) withheld from an Award or separately surrendered by the Participant in payment of the exercise or purchase price or in payment of taxes relating to such an Award or (ii) not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding Option or SAR shall be deemed to constitute delivered shares, will not be available for future Awards under the Plan and shall continue to be counted as outstanding for purposes of determining whether award limits have been attained. If an Award is settled in cash, the number of shares of common stock on which the Award is based shall not count toward any individual share limit, but shall count against the Annual Award Limit for Cash-Based Awards. Awards assumed or substituted for in a merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock or reorganization will not reduce the share reserve. The Shares available for issuance under this Plan may be authorized and unissued Shares or treasury Shares.

4.3Annual Award Limits. Unless and until the Committee determines that an Award to a Covered Employee shall not be designed to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, theThe following limits (each an “Annual Award Limit” and, collectively, “Annual Award Limits”) shall apply to grants of Awards under this Plan:


(a)	Options: The maximum aggregate number of Shares subject to Options granted in any one Plan Year to any one Participant shall be five hundred thousand (500,000).


(b)	SARs: The maximum number of Shares subject to Stock Appreciation Rights granted in any one Plan Year to any one Participant shall be five hundred thousand (500,000).


(c)	Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units: The maximum aggregate grant with respect to Awards of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units in any one Plan Year to any one Participant shall be five hundred thousand (500,000) Shares.


(d)	Performance Units or Performance Shares: The maximum aggregate Award of Performance Units or Performance Shares that a Participant may receive in any one Plan Year shall be five hundred thousand (500,000) Shares, or equal to the value of five hundred thousand (500,000) Shares determined as of the date of payout.


(e)	Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards: The maximum aggregate amount awarded or credited with respect to Cash-Based or Other Stock-Based Awards to any one Participant in any one Plan Year may not exceed the value of five million dollars ($5,000,000) or five hundred thousand (500,000) Shares determined as of the date of payout.

4.4Adjustments in Authorized Shares. In the event of any corporate event or transaction (including, but not limited to, a change in the Shares or the capitalization of the Company), such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, separation, partial or complete liquidation, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split up, spin-off, or other distribution of stock or property

B-7Libbey Inc.

Appendix B

of the Company, combination of Shares, exchange of Shares, dividend in kind, or other like change in capital structure, number of outstanding Shares or distribution (other than normal cash dividends) to shareholders of the Company, or any similar corporate event or transaction, the Committee, in its sole discretion, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of Participants’ rights under this Plan, shall substitute or adjust, as applicable, the number and kind of Shares that may be issued under this Plan or under particular forms of Awards, the number and kind of Shares subject to outstanding Awards, the Option Price or Grant Price applicable to outstanding Awards, the Annual Award Limits, and other value determinations applicable to outstanding Awards.

The Committee, in its sole discretion, also may make appropriate adjustments in the terms of any Awards under this Plan to reflect or relate to the changes or distributions and to modify any other terms of outstanding Awards, including modifications of performance goals and changes in the length of Performance Periods. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, the Committee may not take any action described in this Section 4.4 if the action would result in a violation of the requirements of Code Section 409A. The determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and binding on Participants under this Plan.

Subject to the provisions of Article 1817 and notwithstanding anything else in this Plan to the contrary, the Board or the Committee may authorize the issuance of Awards under this Plan in connection with the assumption of, or substitution for, outstanding benefits previously granted to individuals who become Employees of Libbey Inc. or any Subsidiary as a result of any merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, or reorganization, upon such terms and conditions as the Committee may deem appropriate, subject to compliance with the rules under Code Sections 409A, 422, and 424, as and where applicable. Any Substitute Awards granted under the Plan shall not count against the share limitations set forth in Section 4.3 hereof, to the extent permitted by Section 711 of the NYSE MKTAmerican Company Guide or the comparable corporate governance standards of any other stock exchange on which the Company’s Shares may trade.

Article 5. Eligibility and Participation

5.1Eligibility. Individuals eligible to participate in this Plan include all Employees and Non-employee Directors.

5.2 Actual Participation. Subject to the provisions of this Plan, the Committee from time to time may select from all eligible individuals those individuals to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine, in its sole discretion, the nature of, any and all terms permissible by law with respect to, and the amount of each Award.

Article 6. Stock Options

6.1Grant of Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, Options may be granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, provided that ISOs may be granted only to eligible Employees of the Company or of any parent or Subsidiary (as permitted under Code Sections 422 and 424). However, an Employee who is employed by an Affiliate and/or Subsidiary may be granted Options only to the extent the Affiliate and/or Subsidiary is part of: (i) the Company’s controlled group of corporations or (ii) a trade or business under common control, as of the date of grant, as determined within the meaning of Code Section 414(b) or 414(c) and substituting for this purpose ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of the Affiliate and/or Subsidiary to determine the members of the controlled group of corporations and the entities under common control.

6.2Award Agreement. Each Option grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Option Price, the maximum duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, the conditions upon which an Option shall become vested and exercisable, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine and as are not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan. The Award Agreement also shall specify whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or a NQSO.

6.3 Option Price. The Option Price for each grant of an Option under this Plan shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and shall be specified in the Award Agreement; provided, however, the Option Price must be at least equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the FMV of the Shares as determined on the date of grant.

Notwithstanding this Section 6.3 to the contrary, in the case of an Option that is a Substitute Award, the price per share of the Shares subject to the Option may be less than the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant; provided, however, that X shall not exceed Y, where X is the amount, if any, by which the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date the Substitute Award is granted) of the Shares subject to the Substitute Award exceeds the aggregate option price thereof, and Y is the amount, if any, by which the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined by the Committee as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Awards) of the Shares of the predecessor entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for the Company exceeds the aggregate option price of such Shares.

6.4Term of Options. Each Option granted to a Participant shall expire at such time as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant; provided, however, no Option shall be exercisable later than the tenth (10^th) anniversary date of its grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee has the authority to grant to Participants who are not residents of the United States Nonqualified Stock Options that have a term greater than ten (10) years.

6.5Exercise of Options. Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve. The terms and restrictions applicable to Options need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant.

6.6 Payment. Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercised by the delivery to the Company or an agent designated by the Company of a notice of exercise in a form specified or accepted by the Committee, or by complying with any alternative procedures

2019 Proxy Statement B-8

Appendix B

authorized by the Committee. The notice of exercise shall set forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised and be accompanied by full payment for the Shares.

Payment of the Option Price shall be a condition to the issuance of the Shares as to which an Option shall be exercised. The Option Price of any Option shall be payable to the Company in full either: (a) in cash or its equivalent; (b) by tendering (either by actual delivery or attestation) previously acquired Shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the Option Price; (c) by a cashless (broker-assisted) exercise; (d) by a combination of (a), (b) and/or (c); or (e) any other method approved or accepted by the Committee, in its sole discretion.

Subject to any governing rules or regulations, as soon as practicable after receipt of written notification of exercise and full payment (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding), the Company shall deliver to the Participant evidence of book entry Shares or, upon the Participant’s request, Share certificates in an appropriate amount based upon the number of Shares purchased under the Option(s).

Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all payments under all of the methods indicated above shall be paid in United States dollars.

6.7Restrictions on Share Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option granted under this Article 6 as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, minimum holding period requirements or restrictions under applicable federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which the Shares are then listed and/or traded, or under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to the Shares.

6.8 Termination of Employment.Each Participant’s Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the Option following Termination of Employment or termination of services to the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. These provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Options issued pursuant to this Article 6, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

6.9 Notification of Disqualifying Disposition. If any Participant shall make any disposition of Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of an ISO under the circumstances described in Code Section 421(b) (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), the Participant shall notify the Company of such disposition within ten (10) days thereof.

6.10No Other Feature of Deferral. No Option granted pursuant to this Plan shall provide for any feature for the deferral of compensation other than the deferral of recognition of income until the exercise of the Option.

Article 7. Stock Appreciation Rights

7.1 Grant of SARs. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, SARs may be granted to Participants at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee. However, an Employee who is employed by an Affiliate and/or Subsidiary may be granted SARs only to the extent the Affiliate and/or Subsidiary is: (i) part of the Company’s controlled group of corporations or (ii) a trade or business under common control, as of the date of grant, as determined within the meaning of Code Section 414(b) or 414(c) and substituting for this purpose ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of the Affiliate and/or Subsidiary to determine the members of the controlled group of corporations and the entities under common control.

Subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the number of SARs granted to each Participant and, consistent with the provisions of this Plan, in determining the terms and conditions pertaining to the SARs.

The Grant Price for each grant of a SAR shall be determined by the Committee and shall be specified in the Award Agreement; provided, however, the Grant Price on the date of grant must be at least equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the FMV of the Shares as determined on the date of grant.

Notwithstanding this Section 7.1 to the contrary, in the case of a SAR that is a Substitute Award, the Grant Price of the Shares subject to the SAR may be less than the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant; provided, however, that the X shall not exceed Y, where X is the amount, if any, by which the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date on which the Substitute Award is granted) of the Shares subject to the Substitute Award exceeds the aggregate Grant Price with respect to the Shares subject to the Substitute Award and Y is the amount, if any, by which the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined by the Committee as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Awards), of the Shares of the predecessor entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for the Company exceeds the aggregate Grant Price of the Shares.

7.2SAR Agreement. Each SAR Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Grant Price, the term of the SAR and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine.

7.3Term of SAR. The term of a SAR granted under this Plan shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and, except as determined otherwise by the Committee and specified in the SAR Award Agreement, no SAR shall be exercisable later than the tenth (10^th) anniversary date of its grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee has the authority to grant to Participants who are not residents of the United States SARs that have a term greater than ten (10) years.

7.4 Exercise of SARs. SARs may be exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes.

B-9Libbey Inc.

Appendix B

~~APPENDIX B~~7.5 Settlement of SARs. Upon the exercise of a SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount equal to the product of the excess of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the Grant Price and the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised.

~~(dollars~~At the discretion of the Committee, the payment upon SAR exercise may be in ~~thousands)~~cash, Shares or any combination of cash and Shares, or in any other manner approved by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee’s determination regarding the form of SAR payout shall be set forth in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the SAR.

7.6Termination of Employment. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the SAR following Termination of Employment with, or provision of services to, the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. These provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with Participants, need not be uniform among all SARs issued pursuant to this Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

7.7Other Restrictions. The Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares received upon exercise of a SAR granted pursuant to this Plan as it may deem advisable or desirable. These restrictions may include, but shall not be limited to, a requirement that the Participant hold the Shares received upon exercise of a SAR for a specified period of time.

7.8No Other Feature of Deferral. No SAR granted pursuant to this Plan shall provide for any feature for the deferral of compensation other than the deferral of recognition of income until the exercise of the SAR.

Article 8. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

8.1 Grant of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units to Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine.

8.2 Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Each grant of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Period(s) of Restriction, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock or the number of Restricted Stock Units granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine.

8.3Other Restrictions. The Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to this Plan as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, a requirement that Participants pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted Stock or each Restricted Stock Unit, restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals, time-based restrictions on vesting following the attainment of the performance goals, time-based restrictions, restrictions under applicable laws or under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which the Shares are listed or traded, or holding requirements or sale restrictions placed on the Shares by the Company upon vesting of the Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.

To the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, the Company may retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Company’s possession until such time as all conditions and/or restrictions applicable to the Shares have been satisfied or have lapsed.

Except as otherwise provided in this Article 8, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock Award shall become freely transferable by the Participant after all conditions and restrictions applicable to the Shares have been satisfied or have lapsed (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding obligations), and Restricted Stock Units shall be paid in cash, Shares or a combination of cash and Shares as the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine.

8.4Certificate Legend. In addition to any legends placed on certificates pursuant to Section 8.3, each certificate representing Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this Plan may bear a legend such as the following or as otherwise determined by the Committee in its sole discretion:

The sale or transfer of Shares of stock represented by this certificate, whether voluntary, involuntary or by operation of law, is subject to certain restrictions on transfer as set forth in the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 20062016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and in the associated Award Agreement. A copy of this Plan and the Award Agreement may be obtained from Libbey Inc.

8.5Voting Rights. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in a Participant’s Award Agreement, to the extent permitted or required by law, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this Plan may be granted the right to exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares during the Period of Restriction. A Participant shall have no voting rights with respect to any Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to this Plan.

8.6Termination of Employment. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to retain Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units following Termination of Employment with, or provision of services to, the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. These provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units issued pursuant to this Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

8.7 Section 83(b) Election. The Committee may provide in an Award Agreement that the Award of Restricted Stock is conditioned upon the Participant making or refraining from making an election with respect to the Award under Code Section 83(b). If

2019 Proxy Statement B-10

Year ended December 31, 2016
As Reported For SMIP Incentive Calculations
Revenue
Reported net sales $ 793,420
$ 793,420
Add: Sales impact of work stoppage at Toledo, Ohio plant —
7,245
Adjusted net sales 793,420
800,665
Add: Impact of currency to reflect results at budgeted exchange rates —
6,263
Adjusted net sales at budgeted exchange rates $ 793,420
$ 806,928

Adjusted EBITDA
Reported net income $ 10,073
$ 10,073
Add: Interest expense 20,888
20,888
Add: Provision for income taxes 17,711
17,711
Earnings before interest and income taxes (EBIT) 48,672
48,672
Add: Depreciation and amortization 48,486
48,486
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 97,158
97,158
Add: Special items before interest and taxes
Pension settlement 168
—
Product portfolio optimization 5,693
5,693
Work Stoppage 4,162
4,162
Executive terminations 4,460
3,554
Derivatives (1,860 ) (1,860 )
2010 Mexican tax assessment —
1,085
Adjusted EBITDA 109,781
109,792
Add: Impact of currency to reflect results at budgeted exchange rates —
4,609
Adjusted EBITDA at budgeted exchange rates 109,781
114,401

Change in Trade Working Capital
Change in accounts receivable - net $ 9,266
$ 9,266
Change in inventories - net 8,018
8,018
Change in accounts payable 22
22
Change in trade working capital 17,306
17,306
Add: Adjustments
Inventory impact of work stoppage at Toledo, Ohio plant —
(2,694 )
Inventory impact of product portfolio optimization —
(5,693 )
Adjusted change in trade working capital 17,306
8,919
Add: Impact of currency —
4,616
Adjusted change in trade working capital at budgeted exchange rates $ 17,306
$ 4,303

Adjusted Cash Earnings
Adjusted EBITDA at budgeted exchange rates $ 109,781
$ 114,401
Adjusted change in trade working capital at budgeted exchange rates 17,306
4,303
Adjusted cash earnings at budgeted exchange rates $ 127,087
$ 118,704

Appendix B

a Participant makes an election pursuant to Code Section 83(b) concerning a Restricted Stock Award, the Participant shall be required to file promptly a copy of the election with the Company.

Article 9. Performance Units/Performance Shares

9.1 Grant of Performance Units/Performance Shares. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Performance Units and/or Performance Shares to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine.

9.2 Value of Performance Units/Performance Shares. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial value that is established by the Committee at the time of grant. Each Performance Share shall have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant. The Committee shall set performance goals in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the value and/or number of Performance Units/Performance Shares that will be paid out to the Participant.

9.3Earning of Performance Units/Performance Shares. Subject to the terms of this Plan, after the applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Units/Performance Shares shall be entitled to receive payout on the value and number of Performance Units/Performance Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance goals have been achieved.

9.4 Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Units/Performance Shares. Payment of earned Performance Units/Performance Shares shall be as determined by the Committee and as evidenced in the Award Agreement. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance Units/Performance Shares in the form of cash or in Shares (or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the earned Performance Units/Performance Shares at the close of the applicable Performance Period, or as soon as practicable after the end of the Performance Period. Any Shares may be granted subject to any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee. The determination of the Committee with respect to the form of payout of the Awards shall be set forth in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the Award.

9.5 Termination of Employment. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to retain Performance Units and/or Performance Shares following Termination of Employment with, or provision of services to, the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. These provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Awards of Performance Units or Performance Shares issued pursuant to this Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

Article 10. Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards

10.1Grant of Cash-Based Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Cash-Based Awards to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee may determine.

10.2Other Stock-Based Awards. The Committee may grant other types of equity-based or equity-related Awards not otherwise described by the terms of this Plan (including the grant or promise to deliver or offer for sale of unrestricted Shares) in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine. Other Stock-Based Awards may involve the transfer of actual Shares to Participants, or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of Shares, and may include, without limitation, Awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions other than the United States.

10.3Value of Cash-Based and Other Stock-Based Awards. Each Cash-Based Award shall specify a payment amount or payment range as determined by the Committee. Each Other Stock-Based Award shall be expressed in terms of Shares or units based on Shares, as determined by the Committee. The Committee may establish performance goals in its discretion. If the Committee exercises its discretion to establish performance goals, the number and/or value of Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards that will be paid out to the Participant will depend on the extent to which the performance goals are met.

10.4Payment of Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards. Payment, if any, with respect to a Cash-Based Award or an Other Stock-Based Award shall be made, in accordance with the terms of the Award, in cash or Shares as the Committee determines.

10.5Termination of Employment. The Committee shall determine the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to receive Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards following Termination of Employment with, or provision of services to, the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. These provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, may be included in an agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Awards of Cash-Based Awards orOther Stock-Based Awards issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

Article 11. Transferability of Awards

11.1Transferability.Except as provided in Section 11.2 below, during a Participant’s lifetime, his or her Awards shall be exercisable only by the Participant. Awards shall not be transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or, subject to the consent of the Committee, pursuant to a DRO; no Awards shall be subject, in whole or in part, to attachment, execution or levy of any kind; and any purported transfer in violation of this Section 11.1 shall be null and void. The Committee may establish such procedures as it deems appropriate for a Participant to designate a beneficiary to whom any amounts payable or Shares deliverable in the event of, or following, the Participant’s death may be provided.

11.2Committee Action. The Committee may, in its discretion, determine that notwithstanding Section 11.1, any or all Awards (other than ISOs) shall be transferable to and exercisable by such transferees, and subject to such terms and conditions, as the

B-11Libbey Inc.

Appendix B

Committee may deem appropriate; provided, however, no Award may be transferred for value (as defined in the General Instructions to Form S-8).

Article 12. Performance Measures

12.1Performance Measures. The performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of an Award to a Covered Employee that is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall be limited to the following Performance Measures:


(a)	Net earnings or net income (before or after taxes);


(b)	Earnings per share;


(c)	Net sales or revenue growth;


(d)	Net operating profit;


(e)	Return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales or revenue);


(f)	Cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow, free cash flow, cash flow return on equity and cash flow return on investment);


(g)	Earnings before or after taxes, interest, depreciation and/or amortization;


(h)	Gross or operating margins;


(i)	Productivity ratios;


(j)	Share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return);


(k)	Expense targets;


(l)	Cost reductions or savings;


(m)	Performance against operating budget goals;


(n)	Margins;


(o)	Operating efficiency;


(p)	Funds from operations;


(q)	Market share;


(r)	Customer satisfaction;


(s)	Working capital targets; and


(t)	Economic value added or EVA^® (net operating profit after tax minus the sum of capital multiplied by the cost of capital).

Any Performance Measure(s) may be used to measure the performance of the Company, Subsidiary and/or Affiliate as a whole or any business unit of the Company, Subsidiary and/or Affiliate, or any combination thereof, as the Committee may deem appropriate, or any of the above Performance Measures as compared to the performance of a group of comparator companies, or published or special index that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, or the Company may select Performance Measure (j) above as compared to various stock market indices. The Committee also has the authority to provide for accelerated vesting of any Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the Performance Measures specified in this Article 12.

12.2Evaluation of Performance. The Committee may provide in any such Award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any of the following events that occurs during a Performance Period: (a) asset write-downs, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (c) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (d) any reorganization and restructuring programs, (e) acquisitions or divestitures, (g) foreign exchange gains and losses and/ or foreign currency translation adjustments; and (h) other Special Items. To the extent the inclusions or exclusions affect Awards to Covered Employees, they shall be prescribed in a form that meets the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for deductibility.

12.3Adjustment of Performance-Based Compensation. Awards that are intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation may not be adjusted upward. The Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust the Awards downward, either on a formula or discretionary basis or any combination, as the Committee determines.

12.4Committee Discretion. If applicable tax and/or securities laws change to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing Performance Measures without obtaining shareholder approval of the changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make the changes without obtaining shareholder approval provided the exercise of such discretion does not violate Code Section 409A. In addition, if the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Awards that shall not qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the Committee may make the grants without satisfying the requirements of Code Section 162(m) and base vesting on Performance Measures other than those set forth in Section 12.1.

2019 Proxy Statement B-12

Appendix B

Article 1312. Non-employee Director Awards

Non-employee Directors may be granted Awards pursuant to this Plan only in accordance with this Article 1312. Awards granted to Non-employee Directors pursuant to this Plan shall not be subject to management’s discretion. From time to time, the Nominating and Governance Committee shall set the amount(s) and type(s) of Awards that shall be granted to all Non-employee Directors on a periodic basis pursuant to the Plan, as well as any additional amount(s), if any, to be awarded, also on a periodic basis, based on each of the following: (a) the number of committees of the Board on which a Non-employee Director serves, (b) service of a Non-employee Director as the chair of a committee of the Board, (c) service of a Non-employee Director as Chairman of the Board, or (d) the first selection or appointment of an individual to the Board as a Non-employee Director. Subject to the limits set forth in Section 4.1(c) and the foregoing, the Nominating and Governance Committee shall grant these Awards to Non-employee Directors and any Non-employee Chairman of the Board, and grant new Non-employee Director Awards, as it shall from time to time determine. The terms and conditions of any grant to any Non-employee Director shall be set forth in an Award Agreement.

Article 1413. Dividend Equivalents

Any Participant selected by the Committee may be granted Dividend Equivalents on Shares that are subject to any Award, to be credited as of dividend payment dates, during the period between the date the Award is granted and the date the Award is exercised, vests or expires, as determined by the Committee. However,:(a) no Dividend Equivalents may be granted on any Award of Options or SARs,;(b) dividends or Dividend Equivalents with respect to any shares underlying any Award that is subject to vesting conditions or restrictions shall be deferred and held in escrow or deemed reinvested in additional Shares until all vesting conditions or restrictions relating to the Award (or portion of the Award to which the dividend or Dividend Equivalent relates) have been satisfied and shall be forfeited if and to the extent the vesting conditions or restrictions are not satisfied; and (c) Dividend Equivalents that are granted on any Performance Units and/or Performance Shares shall be deferred and held in escrow or deemed reinvested in additional Performance Units and/or Performance Shares until the achievement of the applicable Performance Measures and the shares underlying such additional Performance Units and/or Performance Shares will be paid only to the extent the shares to which the Dividend Equivalents relate are actually earned.

Article 1514. Beneficiary Designation

Each Participant under this Plan may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under this Plan is to be paid in case of his death before he receives any or all of the benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Committee, and shall be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the Participant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such beneficiary designation, benefits remaining unpaid or rights remaining unexercised at the Participant’s death shall be paid to or exercised by the Participant’s executor, administrator or legal representative.

Article 1615. Rights of Participants

1615.1Employment. Nothing in this Plan or an Award Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries to terminate any Participant’s employment or service on the Board or to the Companyat any time or for any reason not prohibited by law, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue his employment or service as a Director for any specified period of time.

Neither an Award nor any benefits arising under this Plan shall constitute an employment contract with the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries. Accordingly, subject to Articles 3 and 1817, this Plan and the benefits under it may be terminated at any time in the sole and exclusive discretion of the Committee without giving rise to any liability on the part of the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries.

1615.2Participation. No individual shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award.

1615.3Rights as a Shareholder. Except as otherwise provided in this Plan, a Participant shall have none of the rights of a shareholder with respect to Shares covered by any Award until the Participant becomes the record holder of the Shares.

Article 1716. Change in Control

1716.1 Change of Control of the Company. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, the provisions of this Article 1716 shall apply in the event of a Change of Control.

Except to the extent that a Replacement Award is provided to the Participant to replace an outstanding Award upon a Change of Control:


(a)	all then-outstanding Options and SARs shall become fully vested and exercisable immediately;


(b)	all other Awards that are not then vested and as to which vesting depends upon only the satisfaction of a service obligation by a Participant to the Company, Subsidiary or Affiliate shall vest in full and be free of restrictions related to the vesting of the Awards; and


(c)	All then-outstanding Performance Units, Performance Shares, Other Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock Based Awards that vest upon the attainment of Performance Measuresgoals shall be prorated as of the date of the Change

B-13Libbey Inc.

Appendix B

in Control and deemed earned if and to the extent the applicable Performance Measuresgoals actually are achieved as of the date of the Change in Control, provided that, if the extent to which the applicable Performance Measuresgoals actually are achieved as of the date of the Change in Control cannot reasonably be determined by the Committee, then such Awards shall be prorated as of the date of the Change in Control and deemed earned as if target performance had been achieved as of that date.

Except to the extent that a Replacement Award is provided to the Participant, the Committee may, in its sole discretion: (i) determine that any or all outstanding Awards granted under the Plan, whether or not exercisable, will be canceled and terminated and that in connection with the cancellation and termination the holder of the Award may receive for each Share of Common Stock subject to the Awards a cash payment (or the delivery of shares of stock, other securities or a combination of cash, stock and securities equivalent to the cash payment) equal to the difference, if any, between the consideration received by shareholders of the Company in respect of a Share of Common Stock in connection with the transaction and the product of the purchase price, if any, per share under the Award and the number of Shares of Common Stock subject to the Award; provided, however, that if the product is zero or less, or to the extent that the Award is not then exercisable, the Awards will be canceled and terminated without payment therefor; or (ii) provide that the period to exercise Options or SARs granted under the Plan shall be extended (but not beyond the expiration of the Option or SAR).

1716.2Replacement Awards. An Award shall meet the conditions of this Section 1716.2 (and hence qualify as a Replacement Award) if: (i) it has a value at least equal to the value of the Replaced Award as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion; (ii) it relates to publicly traded equity securities of the Company or its successor pursuant to the Change in Control or another entity that is affiliated with the Company or its successor following the Change in Control; and (iii) its other terms and conditions are not less favorable to the Participant than the terms and conditions of the Replaced Award (including the provisions that would apply in the event of a subsequent Change of Control). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Replacement Award may take the form of a continuation of the Replaced Award if the requirements of the preceding sentence are satisfied. The determination as to whether the conditions of this Section 1716.2 are satisfied shall be made by the Committee, as constituted immediately before the Change of Control, in its sole discretion.

1716.3Termination of Employment. Upon a Termination of Employment or, in the case of Directors, a termination of service as a Director, of a Participant occurring in connection with or during the period of two (2) years after the Change in Control, other than for Cause, (i) all Replacement Awards held by the Participant shall become fully vested and (if applicable) exercisable and free of restrictions, and (ii) all Options and SARs held by the Participant immediately before the termination of employment or termination of service as a Director that the Participant held as of the date of the Change in Control or that constitute Replacement Awards shall remain exercisable for not less than one (1) year following the termination or until the expiration of the stated term of the Option or SAR, whichever period is shorter; provided that, if the applicable Award Agreement provides for a longer period of exercisability, that provision shall control.

Article 1817. Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination

1817.1Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination. Subject to Section 18.3, the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify, suspend or terminate this Plan and any Award Agreement in whole or in part; provided, however, that, without the prior approval of the Company’s shareholders and except as provided in Section 4.4, Options or SARs issued under this Plan will not be repriced, replaced or regranted through cancellation and substitution of another Award, or by lowering the Option Price of a previously granted Option or the Grant Price of a previously granted SAR, or by exchange for cash, and no amendment of this Plan shall be made without shareholder approval if shareholder approval is required by law, regulation or stock exchange rule.

1817.2Awards Previously Granted. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary (other than Section 1817.3), no termination, amendment, suspension or modification of this Plan or an Award Agreement shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted under this Plan, without the written consent of the Participant holding the Award.

1817.3Amendment to Conform to Law. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, the Board of Directors may amend the Plan or an Award Agreement, to take effect retroactively or otherwise, as deemed necessary or advisable for the purpose of conforming the Plan or an Award Agreement to any present or future law relating to plans of this or similar nature (including, but not limited to, Code Section 409A), and to the administrative regulations and rulings promulgated under the present or future law.

Article 1918. Withholding

1918.1Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, in order to satisfy federal, state and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of this Plan, the maximum amount that U.S. generally accepted accounting principles permit the Company to deduct or withhold, while still qualifying the Awards for equity accounting.

1918.2Share Withholding. With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units, or upon the achievement of performance goals related to Performance Shares, or any other taxable event arising as a result of an Award granted pursuant to this Plan, Participants may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the maximum tax rate that could be imposed on the transaction and that U.S. generally accepted accounting principles permit the Company to apply while still qualifying the applicable Awards for equity

2019 Proxy Statement B-14

Appendix B

accounting. All such elections shall be irrevocable, made in writing and signed by the Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

Article 2019. Successors

All obligations of the Company under this Plan with respect to Awards granted pursuant to this Plan shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of the successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

Article 2120. General Provisions

2120.1Forfeiture Events; Recoupment.

(a)

The Committee may specify in an Award Agreement that the Participant’s rights, payments and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award. These events may include, but shall not be limited to, termination of employment for cause, termination of the Participant’s provision of services to the Company, Affiliate and/or Subsidiary, violation of material Company, Affiliate and/or Subsidiary policies, breach of noncompetition, confidentiality or other restrictive covenants that may apply to the Participant, or other conduct by the Participant that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries.

(b)

Notwithstanding any provision in this Plan or any Award agreement to the contrary, Awards will be subject, to the extent applicable, to: (i) the terms and conditions of the Company’s recoupment policy (as previously adopted, and as may be amended and restated from time to time); and (b) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as amended (the “Dodd Frank Act”), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, and rules, regulations and binding, published guidance thereunder, and any similar legislation that may be enacted subsequent to the date hereof (including any rules, regulations and binding, published guidance thereunder). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Company may, in its sole discretion, implement any recoupment policies or make any changes to the Company’s existing recoupment policies as the Company deems necessary or advisable in order to company with applicable law or regulatory guidance (including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Act).

2120.2Legend. The certificates for Shares may include any legend that the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer of the Shares.

2120.3Gender and Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used in this Plan also shall include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular, and the singular shall include the plural.

2120.4Severability.In the event any provision of this Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of this Plan, and this Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.

2120.5Requirements of Law.The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under this Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.

2120.6Delivery of Title.The Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver evidence of title for Shares issued under this Plan prior to:


(a)	Obtaining any approvals from governmental agencies that the Company determines are necessary or advisable; and


(b)	Completion of any registration or other qualification of the Shares under any applicable national or foreign law or ruling of any governmental body that the Company determines to be necessary or advisable.

2120.7Inability to Obtain Authority.The inability of the Company to obtain from any regulatory body having jurisdiction such authority as the Company’s counsel deems to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares under this Plan, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell the Shares as to which requisite authority shall not have been obtained.

2120.8Investment Representations.The Committee may require any individual receiving Shares pursuant to an Award under this Plan to represent and warrant in writing that the individual is acquiring the Shares for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute the Shares.

2120.9Employees Based Outside of the United States. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in other countries in which the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries operate or in which Employees or Directors of the Company, its Affiliates and/or its Subsidiaries are located, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to:


(a)	Determine which Affiliates and Subsidiaries shall be covered by this Plan;


(b)	Determine which Employees and/or Directors outside the United States are eligible to participate in this Plan;

B-15Libbey Inc.

Appendix B


(c)	Modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to Employees and/or Directors outside the United States to comply with applicable foreign laws;


(d)	Establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to the extent the actions may be necessary or advisable. Any sub-plans and modifications to Plan terms and procedures established under this Section 2120.9 by the Committee shall be attached to this Plan document as appendices; and


(e)	Take any action, before or after an Award is made, that it deems advisable to obtain approval or comply with any necessary local government regulatory exemptions or approvals.

Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may not take any actions under this Section 2120.9, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate applicable law.

2120.10Uncertificated Shares. To the extent that this Plan provides for issuance of certificates to reflect the transfer of Shares, the transfer of the Shares may be effected on a noncertificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange.

2120.11Unfunded Plan.Participants shall have no right, title or interest in or to any investments that the Company and/or its Subsidiaries and/or its Affiliates may make to aid it in meeting its obligations under this Plan. Nothing contained in this Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, shall create or be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant, beneficiary, legal representative or any other individual. To the extent that any individual acquires a right to receive payments from the Company, its Subsidiaries and/or its Affiliates under this Plan, the right shall be no greater than the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate, as the case may be. All payments to be made under this Plan shall be paid from the general funds of the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate, as the case may be, and no special or separate fund shall be established and no segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of the amounts except as expressly set forth in this Plan.

2120.12No Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to this Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, Awards or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of fractional Shares or whether fractional Shares or any rights to fractional Shares shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.

2120.13Retirement and Welfare Plans. Neither Awards made under this Plan nor Shares or cash paid pursuant to Awards may be included as “compensation” for purposes of computing the benefits payable to any Participant under the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s or Affiliate’s retirement plans (both qualified and non-qualified) or welfare benefit plans unless the other plan expressly provides that the compensation shall be taken into account in computing a Participant’s benefit.

2120.14Deferred Compensation.It is intended that any Award made under this Plan that results in the deferral of compensation (as defined under Code Section 409A) complies with the requirements of Code Section 409A.

2120.15Nonexclusivity of this Plan. The adoption of this Plan shall not be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board or Committee to adopt the other compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable for any Participant.

2120.16No Constraint on Corporate Action. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to: (i) limit, impair or otherwise affect the Company’s or a Subsidiary’s or an Affiliate’s right or power to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations or changes of its capital or business structure, or to merge or consolidate, or dissolve, liquidate, sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets; or (ii) limit the right or power of the Company or a Subsidiary or an Affiliate to take any action that the entity deems to be necessary or appropriate.

2120.17Governing Law. The Plan and each Award Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of this Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, recipients of an Award under this Plan are deemed to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the federal or state courts of Delaware, to resolve any and all issues that may arise out of or relate to this Plan or any related Award Agreement.

2120.18Indemnification.Subject to requirements of Delaware law, each individual who is or shall have been a member of the Board, or a Committee appointed by the Board, or an officer of the Company to whom authority was delegated in accordance with Article 3, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from any loss, cost, liability or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under this Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement thereof, with the Company’s approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his/her own behalf, unless the loss, cost, liability or expense is a result of his/her own willful misconduct or except as expressly provided by statute.

The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which the individuals may be entitled under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

2120.19No Guarantee of Favorable Tax Treatment. Although the Company intends to administer the Plan so that Awards will be exempt from, or will comply with, the requirements of Code Section 409A, the Company does not warrant that any Award under the Plan will qualify for favorable tax treatment under Code Section 409A or any other provision of federal, state, local or foreign law. The Company shall not be liable to any Participant for any tax the Participant might owe as a result of the grant, holding, vesting, exercise or payment of any Award under the Plan.

2019 Proxy Statement B-16



			VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of ~~information up until~~information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ~~Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.~~ET on May 14, 2019 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 12, 2019 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. Electronic Delivery of Future PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting ~~instructions up until~~instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ~~Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.~~ET on May 14, 2019 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 12, 2019 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
	LIBBEY INC. P.O. BOX 10060 TOLEDO, OH 43699-0060



TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:		KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
		DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

For

All

Withhold

All

For All

Except

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following Class ~~III~~II Directors:

Election of Directors

Nominees

~~William~~Ginger M. Jones 02 Eileen A. ~~Foley 02 Deborah G. Miller 03 Steve Nave~~

~~NOTE:~~ ~~The Directors up for election are Class III directors. At the meeting shareholders will transact such other business as properly may come before the meeting.~~

~~The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:~~

~~For~~

~~Against~~

~~Abstain~~

~~Approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the 2016 compensation of the Company’s named executives.~~

~~The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal:~~

~~1 year~~

~~2 years~~

~~3 years~~

~~Abstain~~

~~Recommend, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.~~

Mallesch

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR ~~the following proposal:~~proposals 2, 3 and 4.

For

Against

Abstain

Approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the 2018 compensation of the Company’s named executives.

Approve the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Libbey’s independent auditors for the ~~2017~~2019 fiscal year.

NOTE: The Directors up for election are Class II directors. At the meeting shareholders will transact such other business as properly may come before the meeting.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report and Notice & Proxy Statement are available at www.proxyvote.com.


	LIBBEY INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders May ~~17, 2017~~15, 2019 2:00 PM This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) ~~Veronica (Ronni) L. Smith~~James C. Burmeister and Susan A. Kovach, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock of LIBBEY INC. that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of shareholders to be held at 02:00 PM, EDT on May ~~17, 2017,~~15, 2019, at the Libbey Corporate Showroom, 335 N. St. Clair Street, Toledo, Ohio, 43604, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.
	Continued and to be signed on reverse side



	o	Preliminary Proxy Statement

	o	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

	x	Definitive Proxy Statement

	o	Definitive Additional Materials

	o	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12



x	No fee required.

o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

	(5)	Total fee paid:

o	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

	(1)	Amount previously paid:

	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

	(3)	Filing Party:

	(4)	Date Filed:



			Board Recommendation
1	Elect two directors, both for a term of three years;		FORMs. Jones and Ms. Mallesch		WHEN May 15, 2019 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time

				~~NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS~~
2	Vote, on an advisory basis, to approve executive compensation;		FOR

				~~Libbey Corporate Showroom~~	~~Wednesday, May 17, 2017~~
	~~335 North St. Clair Street~~	~~2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time~~
	~~Toledo, Ohio 43604~~
		WHERE Libbey Corporate Showroom 335 North St. Clair Street Toledo, Ohio 43604
3	Vote to approve the Amended & Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan;			FOR
					~~Record Date:~~ ~~Close~~

4	Vote to ratify the appointment of ~~business on March 20, 2017~~Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for the 2019 fiscal year; and			FOR
					RECORD DATE Close of business on March 20, 2019



~~Meeting Date:~~	~~Wednesday, May 17, 2017, at 2 p.m., local time~~

~~Location:~~	~~Libbey Corporate Showroom~~ ~~335 North St. Clair Street~~ ~~Toledo, Ohio 43604~~

~~Record Date:~~	~~Close of business on March 20, 2017~~Company Overview and Business Highlights



Filed by the Registrant	x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant	o



NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS	i	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES		43
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS	i	Summary Compensation Table		43
		Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table		45
A MESSAGE FROM THE LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR	2	Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table		47
A MESSAGE FROM THE LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR	2	Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2018 Table		48
		Pension Benefits in Fiscal 2018 Table		49
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY	3	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table		50
	3	Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Table		51
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	10			51
PROPOSAL NO. 1	10	CEO PAY RATIO		55
LIBBEY BOARD OF DIRECTORS	10
How does our Board select nominees for our Board?	10	STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION		56
Who are our Director Nominees?	12	Who are the largest owners of Libbey stock?		56
Who are our Continuing Directors?	13	How much Libbey stock do our directors and officers own?		57
How does our Board determine which directors are considered independent?	16	How much Libbey stock do our directors and officers own?
	16	Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance		59
How does our Board think about Board refreshment and succession planning?	16	Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
	16
How do shareholders nominate candidates for the Board?	16	EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION		60
THE BOARD'S ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES	17	PROPOSAL NO. 3		60
What are the Board's key responsibilities?	17
How do shareholders and other interested parties communicate with the Board?	17	AUDIT-RELATED MATTERS		69
	17	PROPOSAL NO. 4		69
BOARD STRUCTURE	17	What fees did Libbey pay to its auditors for fiscal 2018 and 2017?		69
How is our Board leadership structured?	17
What are the roles of the Board's committees?	18	What are Libbey's pre-approval policies and procedures?		69
How often did our Board meet during fiscal 2018?	18	Report of the Audit Committee		70
BOARD PROCESSES	19
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	19	QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING		71
Does Libbey have corporate governance guidelines?	19	QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING
Are Libbey's directors required to attend Libbey's Annual Meeting of Shareholders?	19	Who may vote?		71
	19	What may I vote on, what are my voting options and how does the Board recommend that I vote?		71
NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION	20
		How do I vote?		71
LIBBEY EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	22	May I change my vote?		72
		How many shares of Libbey common stock are outstanding?		72
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	23	How many shares of Libbey common stock are outstanding?
PROPOSAL NO. 2	23	How big a vote do the proposals need in order to be adopted?		72
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS	24
Executive Summary	24	What constitutes a quorum?		72
Executive Compensation Philosophy	27	How will votes be counted?		73
What are the elements of Libbey's executive compensation program?	28	What are broker non-votes?		73
	28	How will voting be conducted on other matters raised at the meeting?		73
What pay did Libbey's executives receive for 2018?	29
How does Libbey determine the forms and amounts of executive pay?	36	When must shareholder proposals be submitted for the 2020 Annual Meeting?		73
	36
What are Libbey's equity grant practices?	38
Policies and practices related to Libbey's executive compensation program	38	GENERAL INFORMATION		74
	38
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control	39	APPENDIX A	A-1
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control	39
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT	42	APPENDIX B	B-1



A MESSAGE FROM THE LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR	~~PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY~~
Dear Fellow Shareholders, 2018 marked Libbey’s 200^th anniversary. Celebrating such a historic milestone provides an opportunity to reflect on the past and look to the future. We value our shareholders, customers, and employees whose dedication and support during the past two centuries have helped us to become the world’s leading global glass tableware manufacturer. In turning to the next 200 years, we are inspired to accelerate Libbey’s evolution and deliver improved performance and value to our stakeholders. On March 25, 2019, Michael P. Bauer became Libbey’s new Chief Executive Officer, succeeding Bill Foley, who retired from the CEO role effective March 24, 2019. As part of Libbey's succession planning process, which has been underway for some time, we undertook an extensive search and our Board believes that Mike is the ideal candidate to succeed Bill. Mike’s considerable knowledge of manufacturing, marketing, supply chain and finance will complement our business and help us continue to drive profitable growth, operational excellence and organizational excellence. We are confident that Mike, working together with our strong management team, will build upon the momentum created under Bill’s leadership. Bill has overseen a critical period in Libbey's commercial transformation over the past several years, including the creation of our highly successful and expanding e-commerce platform, reinvigoration of a culture of product innovation that is driving new product choices for our customers and significant contributions to net sales, and technology investments that are critical to improving our operational performance. Bill has guided Libbey through a particularly challenging competitive environment, helping to maintain and grow our leading industry position. We sincerely appreciate his hard work and commitment. We are also grateful to continue to have his insights and contributions as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Board believes that the mix of institutional knowledge and fresh perspectives among our leadership team, combined with the significant progress made toward executing our strategic priorities, makes Libbey poised to deliver future growth and stability. We thank you for your continued support. Sincerely, John C. Orr Lead Independent Director



~~Proposal~~PROFITABLE GROWTH	~~Voting Options~~OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE	ORGANIZATIONAL EXCELLENCE
Improving marketing capabilities in new product development and innovation to drive profitable growth	Improving operating processes, systems and technology	Building winning teams that foster high performance and live our core values


•	Our adjusted EBITDA (calculated as shown in Appendix A) for 2018 was $71.0 million, compared to $70.6 million in 2017.



GINGER M. JONES, 54		EILEEN A. MALLESCH, 63
	Retired, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of ~~Directors:~~Cooper Tire & Rubber Company ~~Election of William A. Foley, Deborah G. Miller and Steve Nave to serve as Class III directors~~Director Since 2013 Independent	~~For, Withhold (as to any nominee) or Abstain~~	Professional Board Member Director Since 2016 Independent
Qualifications • Experience as chief financial officer of a public company with over $2 billion in revenues • Significant executive leadership experience in financial strategy and experience in public audit functions, resulting in her qualification as an audit committee financial expert • Experience in global supply chain Libbey Committees • Audit Chair • Compensation Other Current Public Company Boards • Tronox Limited (NYSE: TROX)		~~FOR~~ ~~each of~~Qualifications ~~Mr. Foley, Ms. Miller~~• Significant financial and ~~Mr. Nave~~enterprise risk management expertise • Public company board and corporate governance experience • Experience with mergers, acquisitions and divestitures • International business experience • Foodservice industry knowledge Libbey Committees • Audit • Compensation Other Current Public Company Boards • Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ: FITB) • State Auto Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: STFC) • Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BHF)



DIRECTOR NOMINEES
ü	ü	ü	ü
ARE INDEPENDENT	HAVE SIGNIFICANT EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE	HAVE OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE	HAVE FINANCIAL STRATEGY EXPERTISE



Name and Age	Independent	Director Since	Libbey Committees	Other Current Public Company Boards
Michael P. Bauer, 54	No	2019		None
CEO, Libbey Inc.
~~No.~~William A. Foley, 71	No	1994		Myers Industries, Inc.
Executive Chairman, Libbey Inc.
Deborah G. Miller, 69	Yes	2003	A	Sentinel Group Funds, Inc.
CEO, Enterprise Catalyst Group			N&G
Carol A. Moerdyk, 68	Yes	1998	C	American Woodmark Corporation
SVP, International, OfficeMax Incorporated (retired)			N&G	American Woodmark Corporation
Steve Nave, 49	Yes	2017	C	None
President, CEO and a director, Bluestem Group Inc. (retired)			N&G*
John C. Orr, 68	Yes	2008	A	None
President, CEO and a director, Myers Industries, Inc. (retired)			N&G



PROPOSAL NO. 2 ~~— Advisory Say-on-Pay:~~
ADVISORY SAY-ON-PAY
We are providing shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote with respect to the following resolution: RESOLVED, that the ~~stockholders~~shareholders of the Company approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executives, as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation ~~S-K~~S-K.	~~For, Against or Abstain~~	~~FOR~~
		þ
~~No. 3 — Frequency of Future Say-on-Pay Votes:~~The Board recommends a vote FOR this Proposal ~~Recommend, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the frequency - every 3 years, 2 years or 1 year - with which shareholders of the Company should have future advisory say-on-pay votes~~	~~3 years, 2 years, 1 year or Abstain~~	~~1 YEAR~~

~~No. 4 — Ratification of Independent Auditor:~~ ~~Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Libbey’s independent auditors for the 2017 fiscal year~~	~~For, Against or Abstain~~	~~FOR~~


◦	~~Seven are independent as defined in the NYSE MKT Company Guide~~



BOARD SNAPSHOT



INDEPENDENT	TENURE OF LESS THAN 7 YEARS	WOMEN
6^/8	4^/8	4^/8


◦	~~Four are women~~


◦	~~Two are minorities~~



CEO		Element	Key Characteristics	NEOs
	20%			42%
	20%	BASE SALARY		42%

		Base Salary	Fixed component; reviewed annually



	50%
	50%	INCENTIVE-BASED PAY (Performance-Based; At Risk)

		Annual cash incentive award under our SMIP	At-risk variable pay opportunity for short-term performance; based 65% on financial metrics (40% adjusted cash earnings, 15% e-commerce revenue, 10% new product revenue) and 35% on strategic objectives; no guaranteed minimum payout; maximum payout of 200% of target
		Annual cash incentive award under our SMIP		40%

		Long-term performance cash incentive awards under our LTIP	Formula-driven, at-risk cash award that comprises 50% of LTIP opportunity; based on adjusted EBITDA; no guaranteed minimum payout; maximum payout of 200% of target
	30%



		TIME-BASED PAY (At Risk)
		TIME-BASED PAY (At Risk)		18%
				18%
		Restricted stock units (RSUs) granted under our LTIP	Intended to comprise 50% of LTIP opportunity; vest ratably over four years; no dividends or voting rights with respect to unvested RSUs
		Restricted stock units (RSUs) granted under our LTIP


◦	~~We launched two new foodservice stemware collections, Neo and Contour, using our state-of-the-art ClearFire~~^® ~~glass composition;~~


◦	~~2016 net sales of $793.4 million reflected a decrease of 3.5% from prior year, primarily due to foreign currency fluctuation.~~



Company / Index	Base Period Dec 2011	Indexed Returns Years Ending
Company / Index	Base Period Dec 2011	Dec 2012	Dec 2013	Dec 2014	Dec 2015	Dec 2016
Libbey Inc.	100	151.88	164.84	246.78	169.64	158.93
Russell 2000 Index	100	116.35	161.52	169.43	161.95	196.45
Peer Group	100	118.33	173.49	156.65	155.96	203.80



~~Peer Group~~
~~Actuant Corporation~~	~~Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.~~	~~Lifetime Brands, Inc.~~
~~Barnes Group Inc.~~	~~Flexsteel Industries, Inc.~~	~~Lindsay Corporation~~
~~Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.~~	~~Graco, Inc.~~	~~Myers Industries, Inc.~~
~~Callaway Golf Company~~	~~Helen of Troy Limited~~	~~Oxford Industries, Inc.~~
~~Chart Industries, Inc.~~	~~Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corp.~~	~~Trex Company, Inc.~~
~~Coherent, Inc.~~	~~iRobot Corporation~~	~~TriMas Corporation~~
~~ESCO Technologies Inc.~~	~~La-Z-Boy Incorporated~~


◦NO CEO SALARY INCREASE	~~We fell short~~	INCENTIVE PAYMENTS BELOW TARGET	REDUCED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE VALUE	DECLINE IN RSU VALUE
Mr. Foley's annualized salary has never been above $825,000, the initial rate established at his time of hire in January 2016		LTIP payouts were only 19.7% of target; SMIP payouts were 90.3% to 99.4% of target ~~with respect~~⁽¹⁾	To conserve shares, the Committee changed the method used to calculate the number of RSUs awarded in 2018, thereby reducing the economic value of RSUs awarded in 2018 by 21% to 26% compared to the ~~financial performance measures under our 2016 Senior Management Incentive Plan ("SMIP") and our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP")~~


◦	~~We distributed $12.1 million of free cash flow through share repurchases and dividends;~~


◦	~~We reduced trade working capital (defined as net inventory plus net accounts receivable less accounts payable) by $17.3 million.~~


◦	~~2016 SMIP target opportunity equal to 100% of actual base earnings;~~


◦	~~2016 LTIP target opportunity equal to 300% of annual base salary; and~~


◦	~~Prorated target opportunities under performance cash component of the 2014 LTIP and 2015 LTIP equal to $326,700 and $653,400, respectively.~~


◦	~~Severance equal to 2x base salary + 2x annual incentive target;~~


◦	~~Prorated annual incentive under the 2016 SMIP, based on forecasted Company performance;~~


◦	~~Prorated performance cash incentives under the 2014 LTIP, 2015 LTIP and 2016 LTIP, based on forecasted Company performance;~~


◦	~~Outplacement services for 24 months, not to exceed $75,000 in total; and~~


◦	~~Continuation of health and life insurance benefits for 18 months.~~



~~PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY~~previous method		RSUs granted in 2018 have declined in value since grant date



CEO Target Pay Opportunity vs. Realizable Pay
Target Pay includes: • annualized base salary at the rate in effect as of January 1, 2018; • 2018 SMIP target opportunity as estimated at the time of grant; • performance cash target opportunity under the 2016 LTIP (for the 2016-2018 performance cycle); • the grant date fair value of RSUs granted in 2018 pursuant to our 2018 LTIP; and • the value of "All Other Compensation" as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.	~~PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY~~	Realizable Pay includes: • actual base salary; • actual payout under the 2018 SMIP; • actual performance cash payout under the 2016 LTIP (for the 2016-2018 performance cycle); • the market value of RSUs granted in 2018 pursuant to our 2018 LTIP; and • the value of "All Other Compensation" as reported in the Summary Compensation Table. The market value was determined by multiplying the number of RSUs by $3.88, the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day of 2018.



~~What We Do~~ üWHAT WE DO		~~What We Don't Do~~ ûWHAT WE DON’T DO
ü	We tie pay to performance by ensuring that a significant portion of executive pay is performance-based ~~and~~or at-risk. We set clear financial and strategic goals for corporate performance, and we differentiate based on individual performance against objectives determined early in the year.		x	~~We do not regularly provide tax gross-ups except on relocation assistance.~~
			x	~~We do not maintain compensation programs that we believe create undue risks for our business.~~
ü	Periodically, we review market data relative to our peer group of companies, and we utilize tally sheets to ensure compensation opportunities are consistent with the Compensation ~~Committee's~~Committee’s intent.		x	~~We do not provide significant additional benefits to executive officers that differ from those provided to all other U.S. employees.~~
			x	~~We do not permit repricing of stock options or SARs, nor do we permit buyouts of underwater stock options or SARs.~~
ü	We mitigate undue risk by emphasizing long-term incentives and using caps on potential payouts under both our annual and long-term incentive plans, clawback provisions in our Omnibus Incentive ~~Plan,~~Plans, reasonable retention strategies, performance targets and appropriate Board and management processes to identify and manage risk.		x
ü We have modest post-employment and change in control arrangements that apply to our executives and are competitive with market practices. ü We utilize “double-trigger” vesting of equity awards and non-equity incentives after a change in control. ü We provide only limited perquisites that we believe have a sound benefit to our business. ü We have stock retention requirements to enhance alignment of our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. ü Our Compensation Committee retains an external, independent compensation consultant and other external advisors as needed.			x	û We do not maintain compensation programs that we believe create undue risks for our business. û We do not provide significant additional benefits to executive officers that differ from those provided to all other U.S. employees. û We do not permit repricing of stock options or SARs, nor do we permit buyouts of underwater stock options or SARs. ûWe do not permit hedging, pledging or engaging in transactions involving derivatives of our stock.
			x	Effective with Mr. Foley's hire on January 12, 2016, we do not have an employment agreement or change in control agreement with our CEO, nor is our CEO covered by our Executive Severance Compensation Policy.
ü	~~We have modest post-employment and change in control arrangements that apply to our executive officers, with severance multiples of less than or equal to 2x.~~		x
ü	~~We utilize "double-trigger" vesting of equity awards and non-equity incentives after a change in control.~~
ü			x	ûWe do not have employment agreements with our ~~non-CEO~~ executive officers.
ü	~~We provide only minimal perquisites that we believe have a sound benefit to our business.~~		x
ü	~~We have stock ownership / retention requirements to enhance alignment of our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders.~~
ü	ûOur ~~Compensation Committee retains an external, independent compensation consultant~~severance and ~~other external advisors as needed.~~			change in control benefits do not include tax "gross-ups."



~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~PROPOSAL NO. 3
AMENDED AND RESTATED LIBBEY INC. 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
Approval of the Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.	þ
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this Proposal.

NO CEO SALARY INCREASE

INCENTIVE PAYMENTS BELOW TARGET

REDUCED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE VALUE

DECLINE IN RSU VALUE

Mr. Foley's annualized salary has never been above $825,000, the initial rate established at his time of hire in January 2016

LTIP payouts were only 19.7% of target; SMIP payouts were 90.3% to 99.4% of target⁽¹⁾

To conserve shares, the Committee changed the method used to calculate the number of RSUs awarded in 2018, thereby reducing the economic value of RSUs awarded in 2018 by 21% to 26% compared to the previous method

RSUs granted in 2018 have declined in value since grant date